It's hard keeping a blogroll current, isn't it? Links change and hide in other locations (if not disappearing forever); I keep on wondering for how long I can possibly keep the few formerly respectable, now so utterly partisan and driven insane by the Obama Presidency that they're rarely worth a look, right wing sites still on the list. (Well, Hot Air I'll keep, but the "columnists" at PJ Media just haven't been worth reading for years.)
I've also got to try to remember any blogs/sites that I have been meaning to add but not got around to yet. NPR was probably the most recent one. The Barfblog is surely the world's best and most active blog on food poisoning, and deserves a place.
As I think I have lamented before, there are actually few good, active sites or blogs on things I've always been interested in - the paranormal and even UFOs. (By the way, my shower thought of the other night - is it possible that the now highly debris cluttered region of low earth orbit be part of the reason we don't see many alien visitors in the last couple of decades? I thought there was one or two pretty well testified sightings from the 60's or 70's of what looked like satellites that suddenly took paths that could not possibly be followed by Earth launched ones, but I haven't heard of anything like that for a long time. Perhaps because it has become too dangerous for them to hang around there.)
Somewhere on twitter I noticed recently a list of science fiction authors who tweet/blog. Not that I really read any of them lately, but one or two might be worthwhile. Jerry Pournelle is increasingly frail, and he's a bit of a climate change skeptic, further confirming the rule that denialism is a club for old, white men, and silly (usually rich) but slightly younger libertarians.
Speaking of aging climate change denialists, it was funny to read that Mark Steyn is asking the court to hurry up with his defamation case because his expert witnesses are mostly old and at risk of dying before they can give evidence at this trial. (He noted that one had died already - I'm betting it was Bob Carter.) As far as I can make out, Steyn has taken the too-cute-by-half technique of doubling down on over-the-top criticism of Mann and climate science generally since this action started, all as a way of being able to argue at trial "come on, look how I exaggerate and carry on all the time - no one can really take it seriously, and nor should Michael Mann." It's a pretty shameful thing to do, and it's no wonder no lawyer is involved.
Anyway, blogroll clean up later tonight. Or tomorrow.