Thursday, February 09, 2017

More on that NOAA fight

I see that Science has a good, dispassionate, look at the Bates/Karl dispute.  

It confirms there is nothing harmful to climate science to it.


not trampis said...

I did say previously it was much ado about nothing.

Steve said...

I didn't disagree. I was just more dismayed about how denialists were latching onto it with no regard for looking beyond the David Rose report.

not trampis said...

look no further than Rafe Champion. Did not have a clue and of course did not offer a retraction when the evidence was clearly showing what he said was quite clearly wrong.

I see Nick stokes was banned from Watt's fake news blog for actually saying what occurred.

We cal that being Davidsoned!