I see that the Catallaxy blog is hosting in comments what is surely defamation about a politician. Not just over the top criticism, as is routine there, but a quite specific, and (I would reckon) perfectly actionable claim.
Why does Sinclair Davidson let himself continually run the risk of such action? Or am I missing something about blog owners not being liable for defamation in comments if they don't notice it?
Update: comment has been edited, and defamatory part removed.
I think the Professor should be paying me a spotters fee every time I save him money!
1 comment:
It’s usually the plagiarist who makes defamatory comments .
Post a Comment