Sunday, August 02, 2020

Adam whips himself into a frenzy


Update:   And in an article we can be safely assume Adam would not read, or at least, let influence him, Science magazine notes the vexed issue of lingering effects of infection:
“Everybody talks about a binary situation, you either get it mild and recover quickly, or you get really sick and wind up in the ICU,” says Akrami, who falls into neither category. Thousands echo her story in online COVID-19 support groups. Outpatient clinics for survivors are springing up, and some are already overburdened. Akrami has been waiting more than 4 weeks to be seen at one of them, despite a referral from her general practitioner.

The list of lingering maladies from COVID-19 is longer and more varied than most doctors could have imagined. Ongoing problems include fatigue, a racing heartbeat, shortness of breath, achy joints, foggy thinking, a persistent loss of sense of smell, and damage to the heart, lungs, kidneys, and brain.

The likelihood of a patient developing persistent symptoms is hard to pin down because different studies track different outcomes and follow survivors for different lengths of time. One group in Italy found that 87% of a patient cohort hospitalized for acute COVID-19 was still struggling 2 months later. Data from the COVID Symptom Study, which uses an app into which millions of people in the United States, United Kingdom, and Sweden have tapped their symptoms, suggest 10% to 15% of people—including some “mild” cases—don’t quickly recover. But with the crisis just months old, no one knows how far into the future symptoms will endure, and whether COVID-19 will prompt the onset of chronic diseases....

For Götz Martin Richter, a radiologist at the Klinikum Stuttgart in Germany, what’s especially striking is that just as the illness’ acute symptoms vary unpredictably, so, too, do those that linger. Richter thinks of two patients he has treated: a middle-aged man who experienced mild pneumonia from COVID-19, and an elderly woman already suffering from chronic leukemia and arterial disease, who almost died from the virus and had to be resuscitated. Three months later, the man with the mild case “falls asleep all day long and cannot work,” Richter says. The woman has minimal lung damage and feels fine.
 In one respect, the article reports something that's not as bad as it could be:  it seems that COVID 19 causes less lung lesions than SARS did.  Seems like the range of other effects outweigh that, though.

5 comments:

GMB said...

Well its a terrorist attack. And you have to hand it to the oligarchy. They have us snookered. If we don't have proper preparation and treatment, we have to do what they wanted, lose all our freedoms, or else we will have infection breakouts.

So pivoting towards preparation and treatment isn't just some minor suggestion on my part. We are going to have to do this or we will lose all our rights. And you Steve, have not sent for your high dose vitamin D or your zinc ionpohores. Have you Steve. Bloody bloody bloody. Get with the program. We have a country to save.

GMB said...

The snookering really is amazing. Consider that the Democrats have a brain damaged candidate that cannot lose unless he campaigns. On the other side (really the same side) is a candidate that can only win if he campaigns. He's good at campaigning. But he can't campaign because of Covid.

And thats valid. Because its crowds that spread the virus more effectively than any other vector. BDS protests, Trump rallies and cruise ships can all be reasonably expected to spread the virus with great effectiveness.

So you have to appreciate the work of the terrorists. They really do have us snookered, and knowing this we must work to get our freedom back. Get your necessary vitamins from overseas Steve. You are letting down the nation.

GMB said...

Sars-1 was a lot more lethal than Sars-2 but it didn't spread all that well. But the terrorists managed to outlaw everything we learned about treating Sars-1. So suggesting that this isn't a terrorist attack is fundamentally delusional.

Not Trampis said...

THe counterfactual to a formal lockdown is an informal lockdown as in Sweden.

Herd Immunity will never work as people are not stupid. They do not want to get the virus

GMB said...

I think good treatment and preparation combined with comfortable masks in the right places will promote her immunity. Because you will still get your small dosage with the masks on. So if you are high in vitamin D, and you have your HCQ (or lesser alternatives) at home that small dose will help you get immunity. My ladies husband and two sons haven't been touched by this. They are slim fellows who get sun on their body all the time. Its very likely they have built up resistance. I think masks are PART OF herd immunity precisely because they aren't perfect. Go for comfort. Not for perfection.