There’s a pretty good essay in the NYT about how whether it is right to give up on free will as a result of the experiments which show that an outsider who can read a brain state correctly can know a person’s decision before the person knows it.
Kant gets invoked to argue that free will is still there, and that the free will conundrum basically arises from not realising the limits of reason. (I think that’s a fair summary, anyway.)
All very interesting.
No comments:
Post a Comment