Another piece of misleading and rubbish reporting on climate change at The Australian, with Graham Lloyd (and whoever came up with a snide headline "Data on global warming 'adjusted'" spending about 80% of an article about Watts and Muller on Watts' draft "paper", without mentioning that Watts himself (and "co-author" McIntyre) have acknowledged at least one serious problem with it.
This is just dishonest reporting with an agenda. Lloyd refers to the online controversy about the matter, but simply chooses not to tell us that as between Watts and Muller it is definitely, without doubt, Watts who is in the most embarrassing position.
More detailed criticism of Watts' work is up at Skeptical Science.
"Another piece of misleading and rubbish reporting on climate change at The Australian"
ReplyDeleteis a tautology