Friday, January 10, 2014

Cold weather

I suppose I should put a link or two here about how the cold American winter is not that cold for the country, polar vortex or not.

I thought this post at Wonkblog dealt with the whole climate change denying mocking response of the Right very well.  Except that, of course, most of them are too stupid to read it.

Truly, the Right is currently intellectually bankrupt, but when will this finally pass?   We really have to wait for the next global heatwave (to get past 1998 on Roy Spencer's chart) before they'll reconsider?  (Funnily enough, Spencer's figure for the month of December 2013 does not even show it as a particularly cool month, globally.  Yet Roy himself has joined in the "ha ha!" mood, showing what an ideologically driven tosser he is.  Judith Curry did the same on her blog about the ship stuck in ice in Antarctica - quoting serious papers discussing why Antarctic sea ice is lately increasing, none of which doubt AGW - but then going "ha ha, isn't it hilarious how this is a PR disaster for AGW.")

They are not to be taken seriously.

10 comments:

  1. Anonymous8:30 am


    "most of them are too stupid to read it."

    "Truly, the Right is currently intellectually bankrupt"

    "showing what an ideologically driven tosser he is."

    "They are not to be taken seriously."

    Much like this post?

    Its getting so much easier to mock warmists, every year, so much easier. Please tell us about the models, tell us about the 97% consenus, because as we all know, science is not about the determination of whether a theory is true or false, but how many people agree with a particular point of view.

    Do tell us about the hot spot, that still cannot be found, do tell us about the 16 year pause in warming, tell us about the last 10 years which are cooler.

    You farkin idiot. Hows ya Julia cup going?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well I had a article on all that.

    Fact is model's have under predicted. A bit like Treasury on the ETS and the CPI.

    As I recall that was ANOTHER Catallaxy prediction that was badly wrong.
    funny about that!

    Steve these morons think a bit of cold weather means no AGW. It doesn't.It never did.
    If only these people could read.

    ReplyDelete
  3. good article by Brad Plumer which I added to Around the Traps, in the Climate section thanking you of course

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous4:24 pm

    Fact is models have over predicted nottrampis, do read independent sources on this, simply put, you are a liar.

    What is a catallaxy?

    I did not even mention any recent cold anywhere, funny that "these people" are not the only ones that cant read.

    nottrampis, you are another fuckin idiot just like the silly confused cunt whose blog this is.

    Do you have a Julie mug as well? How cute.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Fact is you fouth mouth creature is that you do not know what the facts are.

    Very typical of the ignorami in fact.

    Read Steve's link or my article and become enlightened but then you obviously cannot read!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous5:32 pm

    I don't read the recommendations of liars and frauds you farkin cats pole.

    Now go and whine about farkin boat bastards or whatever else that passes for reality in your cunt of a life.

    Farkin fraud.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This article shows how the models have under-predicted.

    Well you can't read so do not bother.

    I find it highly ironic the people who like to call liar all the time are liars themselves!

    so easy to dispense with ignorant people

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous6:22 pm

    You fraud, the article shows you what you need to believe, go look at the over predictions you farkin halfwit. You know neutral sources, actual science that does not pick sides but is only interested in facts.

    You disgust me, you raise a gale without ever leaving port.

    You are a farkin fraud.

    ReplyDelete
  9. typical ignorant denialist.


    It does not matter what evidence you produce they simply do not understand it.

    reminds of old style communists. Evidence doesn't matter only idealogy

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous8:36 am

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete