Suggestions for lines for Peta to be saying welcome.
I think it's Twitter worthy as it is, though.
Update: that was a hint to someone, anyone, with a Twitter account to post it to auspol. :-)
BTW, I haven't seen the movie yet. Next weekend.
Update 2: I have previously been critical of politicians who call a broken promise a lie. (And yes, I don't give credit to Labor when they do that to Abbott either.)
But just on the radio this morning, I heard Abbott repeat what is a clear lie from 2011 when giving his press conference with (his only) international buddy on climate change, Stephen Harper:
“We should do what we reasonably can to limit emissions and avoid man-made climate change but we shouldn’t clobber the economy, and that’s why I’ve always been against a carbon tax and an emissions trading scheme, because it harms our economy without necessarily helping the environment.”This is a lie. As Bernard Keane noted in 2011, Abbott tried to "un-lie" (my word, not Bernard's) the same claim he made back then by a later qualification:
Oddly, despite the media attention, most missed Mr Abbott’s particularly risible remark. It wasn’t merely that Abbott claimed he had never supported a carbon tax or an ETS — a claim so demonstrably untrue even The Australian mentioned it. He belatedly qualified that by adding the caveat “as leader” hours later, the worst recovery since Basil Fawlty, learning his American guest enjoyed the works of Harold Robbins, pretended to be lambasting someone else. “Oh Harold Robbins. I was talking about… Harold Robinson.”Years later, and he's back with the same claim, with no qualification.
For all of the gigantic (and undeserved) kerfuffle from the public about Gillard (allegedly) breaking a promise when her general sympathy to the idea of carbon pricing was well known, Tony Abbott with his "say anything" approach to climate change and a host of other issues is truly the one who has earned the "liar" title.
yes a price on carbon is not the same as a tax. Pretty easy to understand and all Gillard did was similar to that proposed by Rudd negotiated with the Libs or Howard proposed. It was never thought to be a tax then even with a fixed price.
ReplyDeleteImpact on the economy was negligible as forecast by Treasury but not by Sinclair Davidson who was badly wrong again!