This whole Jordan Peterson thing - it's one of those odd situations where I have the feeling that I should be more sympathetic to his philosophical approach to life, having shared some of his general Jungian interest in what mythology, religion and philosophy has been trying to get at over millennia, but I just can't muster the enthusiasm, and suspect there is less to him than meets the eye.
You can read here (out from behind The Australian's paywall) what fan girl Caroline Overington says about his talk this week in Melbourne. (Yes, a rare occasion where that blog's threads serve a useful purpose.) There are certainly signs of crank eccentricity in there regarding diet, which I hadn't heard about before. As for his long term bouts with depression - it raises some concern about his judgement, although if it is well managed, I know it shouldn't.
He certainly got lucky with that ridiculous BBC interviewer. It seems to have doubled or tripled his fame overnight. A good profile of his sometimes rather murky or semi contradictory beliefs is in this recent New Yorker review of his "rules for life" book, although it doesn't add that much to a previous profile of him I had read, which I can't find again at the moment.
Perhaps I would feel less cynical about it were it not for the disproportionate enthusiasm disgruntled conservatives and Right wing culture warrior types have for him. It seems to me that they are looking for a hero, and not finding one in the current somewhat charred reputation of the major Churches (which are either too dogmatic or too "social justice" for them, and caught in their own slow moving crisis of understanding the modern world), they have latched onto Peterson as a de facto leader. I don't really want to use the meme in response, but I have to: "Sad!"
No comments:
Post a Comment