I mean - Blair and Bolt hate it, and their nonsense climate change denialism would indicate that it's probably therefore a worthwhile plan; but Bernard Keane and John Quiggin seem to think it entrenches a pretty carbon emissions friendly scheme that should be opposed - and seeing big emissions companies like BlueScope are supporting it, that makes me suspect the K & Q view is right.
So maybe it is a bad plan for the opposite reasons that Blair and Bolt maintain. Although, I thought this morning on Radio National that Keane seemed less uptight about it than he does no Twitter - calling it a plan which doesn't achieve much. And then I have to work out what Bill Shorten and Labor really think about it - is their support just for cynical "clear this issue off the decks so it's not a liability for us at the election" reasons, or do they think there is scope to fiddle with the details to achieve a good outcome.
It is all very unclear...
Anyway, Blair makes the big rallying call:
This is idiotic. Australians are already paying insane power bills in a nation rich with coal and other electricity-generating resources. Signing into law a 26 per cent cut on 2005 emissions levels by 2030 would only be achievable by erasing more than a quarter of our economy.Yeah, sure. Back to Abbott, is it? Surely even they have their reservations about that.
Shrieking about “the future of the planet” and complaining that “the people that are opposing me within the party do not believe in climate change at all”, Turnbull was turfed by enormous numbers of Liberal voters who contacted their local Liberal branches and representatives.
An identical situation now demands an identical response.
Who, in the scintillating firmament of climate change denying Coalition politicians do they think has any credibility and popular appeal? Tell me, dimwits.
As I showed yesterday the environment is responsible for 16% of the total rise in electricity prices so these two dolts are dolts.
ReplyDeleteFancy both of them being so ignorant about this subject???