First off: I think Gore Verbinski is pretty underrated as a director and visual stylist. I'm a strong defender of all three initial instalments of Pirates of the Caribbean, even as the pace lagged in number 3: they all show real directorial and visual flare. I then enjoyed Rango, his eccentric animated Western, as well as The Lone Ranger - not a perfect film by any means, but again, always watchable, great to look at, and amusing enough to keep me watching. [I've never seen his version of The Ring, as it happens: perhaps soon.]
This is by way of explaining why I was interested to see his last movie - A Cure for Wellness. I caught up with it on Saturday via Google Play.
I knew that it had received mixed reviews - 47% on Metacritic - so I was expecting flaws. And while I knew (before double checking) that it had been been a box office flop - I didn't realise it was a spectacular commercial failure - $8 million in the US, and only $26 million worldwide!
But it turns out to be one of those movies in which lowered expectations are well exceeded.
Best reason to watch it - looks absolutely fantastic, with great directorial flair. Honestly, it's worth watching for that alone.
As for the story - I think it's best described as modern Gothic, and a pretty weird one at that. In many respects, it reminded me of The Shining: it's often ambiguous as to whether we are seeing reality or full or partial hallucination. As such, it could in theory make for a lot of interesting on-line analysis (like Kubrick's move), except for the fact that no one saw it! Also like Kubrick, the characters are not overly sympathetic or deeply drawn, but it doesn't matter much in this case. And it does have a touch of redemption at the end.
I thought it was also interesting how unsympathetically Europeans are generally portrayed: the village outside of the Alpine sanatorium looks like a dump full of punks with no jobs, and as for the German speaking workers back in the spa - none of them are to be trusted. I see that Verbinski was born in the US but had Polish grandparents. He is also credited as co-story writer for this film. I wonder if he intended that it have a "never trust a German" subtext, even though set in Switzerland?
It is obviously not going to be everyone's taste: there are two scenes in particular that are somewhat over the top (one a torture scene that was short but so intense I had to look away. That's not so common for me, although that's perhaps because I don't watch awful torture themed movies - like the Saw series - anyway.) There is too much ambiguity in terms of where reality ends and hallucination begins. And really, do movies with plots involving incest ever do all that well? (OK, excepting Chinatown - which, incidentally, I consider over-praised.)
But overall, I would strongly recommend that folk with a taste for dreamlike Gothic horror, and who want to see a stunningly good looking film made by a director who really knows what to do with a camera, go watch it.
Finally, here's an article that talks about where they filmed it - part of it was in a military hospital where Hitler was once treated! Interesting.
Update: I suppose I should have checked Reddit, but there is a fair bit of discussion there trying to get to the bottom of the story. I would love to know whether there is a deliberate hidden explanation waiting to be found in it, or whether Gore deliberately kept things so ambiguous so as to make that a talking point. (Same could be speculated about Kubrick and The Shining, too.)
No comments:
Post a Comment