A short history of the "we didn't go to the Moon" conspiracy
This article at The Guardian isn't bad, and reminded me that Fox News - that unique source of the dumbing down of America - revived it with a "documentary" in 2001.
Stand proud, Rupert Murdoch, and all who support him.
Bird will be along any hour now to clear it all up for us...
Speaking more broadly of the moon, I cannot recall for sure, but I think it might have been in Omni magazine, where someone did some calculations about how long we could get by with using the moon as an artificial sun if our real sun wasn't around. I think it assumed fusion power, and lots and lots of bright light-bulb-ish things on the surface, so that it would be about as bright and warm as the Sun. The figures stacked up pretty good, I think - in the millions of years, perhaps?
No-one can say we haven't been to the moon. Because its easy to go to the moon. After all our ancestors went to Mars. They had full-blown FARMS on Mars .... Did-you-know-that?
We can prove 100% that we didn't go to the moon under Apollo. Because we have the data. And we can prove that our ancestors had full-blown farms on Mars. Again we have the data. But since going to the Moon is easy, just not on a firecracker, we are completely unable to refute the idea that we may have recently gone to the moon.
Now you economists particularly, I want you all to think deeply about a cost-effective way to set up a farm on Mars. That way when I show you the farms on Mars it will confirm your great genius in anticipating what they look like.
Rabbi Sinclair. Speak up. Lets have some ideas about cost-effective farms on Mars. What do you need to have a farm on Mars, and what do you need such that this farm will pay its way?
Or if you are clueless, and you want to know these things, like you were on economics, then turn over a new leaf and start asking intelligent questions for a change.
1. Obviously the farm needs to be constructed from local materials, and such materials as can lead to construction without an extended structure of production (Boehm-Bawerk).
2. Clearly this farm, made from local materials needs to be transparent, in order to catch the light from the sun. Though Mars is twice the distance from earth there are no clouds and actually the DAYTIME SKY IS BLACK (did-you-know-that?) So there is plenty of light from the sun for this undertaking.
3. You need a transparent material capable of being manufactured with a short structure of production.
4. You need this farm to be wide enough to move a tight flock of animals in both directions.
5. You need to have a lot more air-pressure on the INSIDE of the farm then on the outside. So though the farm will be transparent there will be visible signs that the farm is being reinforced in order to maintain internal air pressure.
6. From all I have given you above you should be able to draw what a farm on Mars looks like before I show you the actual photographs.
These farms are only two car lanes wide. They are made of glass with metal reinforcement. They are in a state of disrepair, but their basic structure is clear, and its a variation of the tubing in the factories. The tubing in factories, when the air pressure needs to be different on the outside than on the inside. You know what that means because you have your hosing on your girls vacuum cleaner.
On the north and south poles of Mars .... and most particularly on the South Pole of Mars ... the CO2 accumulates as a solid ... as CO2 ice. But it sublimates to gas. Once from the North and once from the South. This causes total planetary dust clouds on Mars. The South pole event is much more powerful than the North Pole series of dust clouds.
The point is with two dust clouds a year, anything interesting that is millions of years old would be untraceable. The farms our ancestors ran on Mars are as clear as a bell. So this wasn't millions of years ago. It was only THOUSANDS of years ago. And not many thousands of years ago either.
So in conclusion the evidence says its EASY to travel to the moon and back, since our ancestors travelled to Mars and back and quite recently. They did it often. They had an outpost out there. But we cannot conclude from this that Apollo was legitimate because the DATA (ie the photos and the television footage) says otherwise.
Now if you want to be like me and be able to dig deep into the unknown ... try and go with ..... FUCKING EVIDENCE. But if you want to be like Steve and having to change your sheets at random intervals, after wetting the bed over airborne plant food ... Just keep on taking your primitive attitude to evidence seriously.
Jason, the capacity of a society to mitigate gravity ought to follow hard on the heels of mastering electricity. The pre quatarnery extinction high-tech society didn’t have the Jews enforcing fake science for the oligarchy. That opens up a lot of possibilities.
Most of our science propaganda is to do with the mystification of gravity. You can see that is the main goal if you reverse engineer it all. So we have to put up with space bending, black holes, worm-holes, dark matter and dark energy and the goal is mostly to bullshit us that mitigating gravity would be difficult. In fact its easy. It has to be easy or they wouldn't go to so much trouble.
Another reason we know its easy is that Townsend Brown managed it when he was a child. Back then because of better (but not perfect) money, taxation and banking, small business tended to be tooled up. Townsend Browns Dads farm workshop had electrical equipment and spinning lathes and things. And he discovered that gravity could be altered before he became a teen.
“Despite the extraordinary volume of evidence (including 382kg of moon rock collected across six missions; corroboration from Russia, Japan and China; and images from the Nasa Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter showing the tracks made by the ….”
More Jew science. Godwin has zero evidence we went to the Moon under Apollo. The rocks had amongst them petrified wood. That proves they weren’t from the moon. It doesn’t prove they were from the moon unless you think trees grow there. FAIL. Jew science confirmed. Neither the Russians, the Japanese or the Chinese have corroborated this charade. A Russian a Jap and a Chinaman walk into a bar …… which Russian, which Jap, which Chinaman? Any ethnic Joe on the street will do if you want to find evidence for tribal bullshit. Fail. Jew science confirmed. And the image also proves that they didn’t go because if they did the NRO would have better photos than that. Fail. Jew science confirmed.
The first time I heard this conspiracy story was in the movie "Sneakers" - early 1990s.
ReplyDeletesee? you're hooked. now you're actually writing Birdbait
ReplyDeleteHard to avoid "Birdbait" when I know that about 80% of what I post about he disputes in his distinctively autodidactic way...
ReplyDeleteApparently the latest conspiracy theory is that the moon doesn't exist at all. It's a hologram or something.
ReplyDeleteSort of an expensive night light for the planet?
ReplyDeleteBird will be along any hour now to clear it all up for us...
ReplyDeleteSpeaking more broadly of the moon, I cannot recall for sure, but I think it might have been in Omni magazine, where someone did some calculations about how long we could get by with using the moon as an artificial sun if our real sun wasn't around. I think it assumed fusion power, and lots and lots of bright light-bulb-ish things on the surface, so that it would be about as bright and warm as the Sun. The figures stacked up pretty good, I think - in the millions of years, perhaps?
No-one can say we haven't been to the moon. Because its easy to go to the moon. After all our ancestors went to Mars. They had full-blown FARMS on Mars .... Did-you-know-that?
ReplyDeleteWe can prove 100% that we didn't go to the moon under Apollo. Because we have the data. And we can prove that our ancestors had full-blown farms on Mars. Again we have the data. But since going to the Moon is easy, just not on a firecracker, we are completely unable to refute the idea that we may have recently gone to the moon.
Now you economists particularly, I want you all to think deeply about a cost-effective way to set up a farm on Mars. That way when I show you the farms on Mars it will confirm your great genius in anticipating what they look like.
Rabbi Sinclair. Speak up. Lets have some ideas about cost-effective farms on Mars. What do you need to have a farm on Mars, and what do you need such that this farm will pay its way?
ReplyDeleteOr if you are clueless, and you want to know these things, like you were on economics, then turn over a new leaf and start asking intelligent questions for a change.
Let me start you slowpokes off.
ReplyDelete1. Obviously the farm needs to be constructed from local materials, and such materials as can lead to construction without an extended structure of production (Boehm-Bawerk).
2. Clearly this farm, made from local materials needs to be transparent, in order to catch the light from the sun. Though Mars is twice the distance from earth there are no clouds and actually the DAYTIME SKY IS BLACK (did-you-know-that?) So there is plenty of light from the sun for this undertaking.
3. You need a transparent material capable of being manufactured with a short structure of production.
4. You need this farm to be wide enough to move a tight flock of animals in both directions.
5. You need to have a lot more air-pressure on the INSIDE of the farm then on the outside. So though the farm will be transparent there will be visible signs that the farm is being reinforced in order to maintain internal air pressure.
6. From all I have given you above you should be able to draw what a farm on Mars looks like before I show you the actual photographs.
These farms are only two car lanes wide. They are made of glass with metal reinforcement. They are in a state of disrepair, but their basic structure is clear, and its a variation of the tubing in the factories. The tubing in factories, when the air pressure needs to be different on the outside than on the inside. You know what that means because you have your hosing on your girls vacuum cleaner.
ReplyDeleteOn the north and south poles of Mars .... and most particularly on the South Pole of Mars ... the CO2 accumulates as a solid ... as CO2 ice. But it sublimates to gas. Once from the North and once from the South. This causes total planetary dust clouds on Mars. The South pole event is much more powerful than the North Pole series of dust clouds.
ReplyDeleteThe point is with two dust clouds a year, anything interesting that is millions of years old would be untraceable. The farms our ancestors ran on Mars are as clear as a bell. So this wasn't millions of years ago. It was only THOUSANDS of years ago. And not many thousands of years ago either.
So in conclusion the evidence says its EASY to travel to the moon and back, since our ancestors travelled to Mars and back and quite recently. They did it often. They had an outpost out there. But we cannot conclude from this that Apollo was legitimate because the DATA (ie the photos and the television footage) says otherwise.
ReplyDeleteLook how controlled you corporate eunuchs are? There aint but one of you emasculated she-males out there with enough moxie to ask for the photographs.
ReplyDeleteThese farms were food support for open cut mining on Mars. Mars was a miners outpost like Kalgoorlie.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.keithlaney.net/MiningMars.html
I swear you are all fucking Philistines and girly-men. I hope you are appropriately shamed. Here are the photos.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.supertorchritual.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Mars-glass-tunnels.jpg
Now if you want to be like me and be able to dig deep into the unknown ... try and go with ..... FUCKING EVIDENCE. But if you want to be like Steve and having to change your sheets at random intervals, after wetting the bed over airborne plant food ... Just keep on taking your primitive attitude to evidence seriously.
Graeme
ReplyDeletepray tell how did our ancestors go to Mars?
"Jew" infringement.
ReplyDeleteGraeme, just so you know - I count your ridiculous use of "Jew science" to carry enough anti-Semitism to be deleted.
ReplyDeleteJason, the capacity of a society to mitigate gravity ought to follow hard on the heels of mastering electricity. The pre quatarnery extinction high-tech society didn’t have the Jews enforcing fake science for the oligarchy. That opens up a lot of possibilities.
ReplyDeleteMost of our science propaganda is to do with the mystification of gravity. You can see that is the main goal if you reverse engineer it all. So we have to put up with space bending, black holes, worm-holes, dark matter and dark energy and the goal is mostly to bullshit us that mitigating gravity would be difficult. In fact its easy. It has to be easy or they wouldn't go to so much trouble.
Another reason we know its easy is that Townsend Brown managed it when he was a child. Back then because of better (but not perfect) money, taxation and banking, small business tended to be tooled up. Townsend Browns Dads farm workshop had electrical equipment and spinning lathes and things. And he discovered that gravity could be altered before he became a teen.
“Despite the extraordinary volume of evidence (including 382kg of moon rock collected across six missions; corroboration from Russia, Japan and China; and images from the Nasa Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter showing the tracks made by the ….”
ReplyDeleteMore Jew science. Godwin has zero evidence we went to the Moon under Apollo. The rocks had amongst them petrified wood. That proves they weren’t from the moon. It doesn’t prove they were from the moon unless you think trees grow there. FAIL. Jew science confirmed. Neither the Russians, the Japanese or the Chinese have corroborated this charade. A Russian a Jap and a Chinaman walk into a bar …… which Russian, which Jap, which Chinaman? Any ethnic Joe on the street will do if you want to find evidence for tribal bullshit. Fail. Jew science confirmed. And the image also proves that they didn’t go because if they did the NRO would have better photos than that. Fail. Jew science confirmed.