Thursday, August 01, 2019

Quantum Darwinism discussed

Peter Woit (of the Not Even Wrong blog) says this: 

Quantum Darwinism, an Idea to Explain Objective Reality, Passes First Tests 

is a good article, so it probably is.

Haven't the time to read it all right now, though. 

3 comments:

  1. Complete horseshit. Fake news.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Darwin in a box. Go on, open it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. These fake scientists suck up all the good stuff and pervert it. I had my own idea of the evolution of matter. Whereas the universe is so incredibly old its origins cannot be traced, still there are some reasonable speculations that could be had about the evolution of matter. Flux evolves to aether which leads to matter. But the type of aether that winds up winning out will be that which drains the randomised energy from flux to itself. Since the universe is like a great over-unity device creating pristine energy all the time. And where aether helps make more aether. If its an aether that doesn't help in the creation of new aether it will lose out to aether that can do this.

    Same goes for matter. Matter has to be reproductive to some extent or it will lose out to matter that is. So new matter is created inside large bodies. Pluto maybe the minimum size, but Pluto is clearly producing new stuff. Also we see that small matter wants to amalgamate with a large body. But two large bodies want to stay apart and orbit, in radical defiance of our heritage gravity formulae. But a moments reflection would suggest that it had to be that way for any meaningful reality to get going.

    Maybe a trillion to the power of a trillion years ago we had some sort of proto-matter that crashed and annihilated itself all the time. Eventually this matter is going to lose out to matter that has the characteristics described.

    ReplyDelete