I've noticed that old JC, at the blog run by arch Catholic crank dover"Iđź’—Russia"beach (New Catallaxy), has been fanboy-ing Vivek Ramaswamy as Presidential candidate.
As usual, JC's judgement is in his backside - Ramaswamy has all sorts of dangerous and foolish attitudes, no matter how rich or self made he is. Let me count the ways:
* has a fence straddling nonsense position on Jan 6 - claiming Trump did wrong, but coming up with this pathetic excuse making for rioters attacking Congress: it was "censorship" that caused all the problem. See this convoluted explanation, for example:
Ramaswamy said that he believes it is “unproductive for our country to blame Trump for January 6, because it exonerates everyone else from introspection on what actually led to the frustrations of Americans that boiled over that day,” referencing the COVID-19 lockdowns, vaccine mandates and the 2020 election as a base for having to “sort all of this out.”
“If you tell people they cannot scream that is when they tear things down,” Ramaswamy said. “And I think that's exactly what happened on January 6.”
However, in his book "Nation of Victims: Identity Politics, the Death of Merit, and the Path Back," Ramaswamy criticized Trump's refusal to accept to the election results.
"It was a dark day for democracy," Ramaswamy wrote. "The loser of the last election refused to concede the race, claimed the election was stolen, raised hundreds of millions of dollars from loyal supporters, and is considering running for executive office again. I'm referring, of course, to Donald Trump."
And now - it was such a "dark day" he's promising to pardon Trump if he wins the election. (Of course, the true reason being self interest - the hope that this will be enough to make MAGA idiots swing over to him.) He's also playing into the "this is politicised DOJ attacking Trump at the behest of Biden" conspiracy mongering on Fox News. Funny, but even former Trump AG and suck up Barr doesn't agree:
“As a legal matter, I don’t see a problem with the indictment,” he added. “I think that it’s not an abuse. The Department of Justice is not acting to weaponize the department by proceeding against the president for a conspiracy to subvert the electoral process.”
* His views on climate change:
In an interview, Ramaswamy said he’s “not a climate denier,” but sees the world’s warming as “not entirely bad.” He says the goal of limiting carbon emissions is “flawed” and that “people should be proud to live a high-carbon lifestyle.” He said “we have a far better chance” of growing out of the problem “than trying to engineer the climate itself.”
He also sees climate activism as one of three “secular religions” that “has America in a chokehold.” He said “the climate religion has about as much to do with the climate as the Spanish Inquisition had to do with Christ, which is to say nothing at all. It is about power, dominion, control, punishment.”
More than other GOP presidential contenders, Ramaswamy targets his criticism on Wall Street sustainability policies. He’s written letters to corporations such a Chevron, criticizing the company’s support for a carbon tax and its calculation of “Scope 3” emissions — those generated when consumers use a product, such as buying gasoline to drive a car.
On Twitter he said:
40 years ago they told us an ice age was imminent. Now they tell us that the climate warming is an existential threat to humanity. Which is it? Neither. It’s really about dominion, control and punishing the west.
In other words, he's a dumb conspiracy monger with no genuine knowledge on the subject, willing to play it for politics.
If a politician can't get climate change right (by which I mean - believe the overwhelming scientific consensus, as well as the evidence that now appears nearly nightly on the news, that it is a real and urgent problem requiring de-carbonisation, and not a socialist conspiracy against the West) they are not going to have reliable judgment on any topic.
* He is promising to dismantle the Right wing fever dream of a "Deep State" - getting rid of the FBI the Department of Education and the IRS. (Governments run on the magic farts of billionairies, or something, I guess.)
As this article says, he's trying to beat Trump by embracing Trumpism, with nonsense stuff like this:
He has also supported raising the voting age to 25 -- a pledge that would require amending the Constitution -- with exceptions for those who serve in the military, for first responders and for those who pass the civics test used to grant citizenship.
Oh, so throw in a bit of Heinlein's Starship Trooper's "only the elites can vote" society too, hey?
* Just today, I see that he is not even above playing footsie with 9/11 conspiracists:
Vivek Ramaswamy cast doubt on the veracity of the government’s explanation of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, saying he didn’t believe the findings of the 9/11 Commission.
In an interview Tuesday night on the conservative Blaze TV, host Alex Stein asked the Republican presidential candidate if he believes 9/11 was an “inside job” or “exactly like the government tells us.”
“I don’t believe the government has told us the truth,” Ramaswamy said. “I’m driven by evidence and data. What I’ve seen in the last several years is we have to be skeptical of what the government does tell us.
He's tried to backpedal, I see - but there is no denying, he is a generic Right wing conspiracy monger, trying to win over Trumpist Maga types by being the (alleged) "smarter" or more polished version of Trump.
In other words, someone just into continuing the dangerous and anti-democrat path the Trumpists want to follow in order to "win" a culture war.
No evidence has ever arisen for this fraud. First you must have an honest CO2 record. Then an honest temperature record. Then you compare the one with the other using a process of human reason.
ReplyDeleteWe know this is fraud since this process has never once been attempted by the liars.