This latest one, on his reaction to Interstellar, seems designed to annoy:
Saw Interstellar on Sun – unapologetic celebration of exploration & progress, vs the ‘caretaker’ spirit of the new Green religion.
"New Green religion" - the line beloved of climate change denying, Andrew Bolt readers and Catallaxy?? Bah, humbug.
I note that one of the more improbable things that Phil Plait (I think) found about the movie was that NASA survives as some secret underground organisation capable of mounting interstellar exploration while the world crumbles around it in environmental catastrophe.
I would have thought that the long term interest in having a global economy strong enough to fund humanity eventually moving off planet actually points to serious action now to limit the potential effects of global warming by urgently reducing CO2. This would help reduce the chance of environmental catastrophe that, unlike in Hollywood, I would not be surprised may prove dire enough economically to delay human expansion indefinitely.
But of course, I haven't seen the movie....
Update: family friendly animation wins at the box office. (And Nolan's movie opens worse than Inception.)