Some more observations

*    I learned this morning that the Saudis tried to kick start a home grown international film industry by making a film with Western actors and production crew,  and it has failed dismally at the US box office.   It was actually filmed years ago, and finally got a small distributor to  buy it, to no benefit:

Starring Anthony Mackie ("Captain America: Brave New World") and directed by Rupert Wyatt ("Rise of the Planet of the Apes"), "Desert Warrior" opened in North American theaters last weekend, though hardly anyone noticed. It made just $487,848 on just over 1,000 screens, making for an abysmal $483 per-screen average. That gives it one of the worst box office openings of all time, but it gets so much worse.

This movie, which most people reading this probably haven't even heard of, carries a monster $150 million production budget. It's also been caught in post-production hell for several years. As "Michael" ruled the box office on its opening weekend, this historical epic quietly bombed its way into the history books.

Read More: https://www.slashfilm.com/2160537/anthony-mackie-desert-warrior-one-of-biggest-box-office-flops-ever/ 

Saudi Arabia is still a country I find it hard to have any sympathy for.  I mean, everything it is spending money on to try to diversify just seems so wasteful.  (See stupid Neom.)   If they were to do something genuinely good for the world - say, embark on becoming the world's largest supplier of cheap solar panels, made from the ridiculous amount of sand that comprises their entire country - I might change my mind.

*    I've watched some Youtube content lately on books and reading, and one thing that has kept coming up to an odd degree is the number of people in comments who say that The Count of Monte Cristo is just the best thing they have ever read.   I didn't realise it was so beloved, and is apparently so readable.   I am almost inclined to give it a try.

*    I feel I always have to preference approval of a Jon Stewart video by pointing out I don't always like every take he has.  But his lengthy and often exasperated look at the aborted White House Correspondents dinner last weekend was, I thought, all very funny: 

A statue for Friday

I've said before I like big statues:  they're inherently awesome.   

Here's a Buddhist one I don't recall seeing before, of Guanyin and it's in Nanshan, Hainan, China:

 

I got this off Wikipedia, and am supposed to give attribution to this, so here we go:   By Fanghong - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3355308

The statue part is considerably bigger than the Statue of Liberty:

The statue ranks among the tallest in the world: 78 meters in height without including its pedestal, and 108 meters if the pedestal is included. (For comparison, the American Statue of Liberty is 93 meters tall when its pedestal is included, and 46 meters without.)^[3] 

The Wikipedia entry talks about state interest in the place, though (in a way I am not entirely sure I should trust):

The temple and statue are owned and operated by two front groups of the Shanghai State Security Bureau, a branch of the Ministry of State Security, as a way to exert ideological control and influence over the southeast Asian Buddhist community and counter the influence of Indian Buddhism.^{[4]: 171–185} The temple promotes Chinese government-approved religious practices known as "South China Sea Buddhism."^{[4]: 171–185} The temple's religious messaging has been managed by the Chinese Communist Party's United Front Work Department since 2018.^{[4]: 171–185}

 The official website does gush a bit:

The relation between Nanshan (the South Mountain) and Guan Yin bodhisattva (Buddha) is predestined and historically extended so long. It is said that among the Guanyin Bodhisattva’s 12 wishes, the second was to live in the South China Sea. Hence，Guanyin is also called South Sea Guanshiyin. Nanshan, located at the coast of South China Sea, resembles a huge legendary turtle, for which it was called Aoshan and deemed as Guanyin’s riding animal in ancient times. In Qiongzhou, the legend has passed for long that Guanyin has ever made the tour to the South China Sea in her effort to save the miserable masses. Everyone in this area praises her for her benevolence. According to the legend, the two islands Dongmao and Ximao were formed of some clay carelessly dropped by Guanyin when she flew with it on her tour of salvation. 

 Anyway, I wouldn't mind visiting Hainan.  Now I have more reason to... 

The same problem

And another thing (or three)....

*  I mentioned recently how the X "For You" feed had gone all weird, with "inspirational" personal stories and such like.  I forgot to mention, but it's hard to avoid - there has also been a big spike in sex related posts in that feed.  Not porn, but people posting on sex topics.  (A bit like the way the Slate website has for years run dubious sex life true experience stories.  "My husband's secret kink is too much of a surprise" type stuff.)    I wish it would stop...

*  Avocados in Australia seem to have become permanently cheap.   This is a good thing, except for the farmers who over-planted, I guess....

*  Back to X - could Naomi Wolf possibly get any nuttier?   And see some of the comments in the thread, too:  

 

An example of Trump adjacent grifting

There's a story at the Washington Post which I will gift link:  A Trump-branded nuclear power project thrilled investors. Then came the crash. 

Some highlights:

When the start-up Fermi America announced plans to build the Donald J. Trump Advanced Energy and Intelligence Campus near Amarillo, Texas, last year, investors clamored for a chance to cash in on the artificial intelligence boom sweeping through the U.S. economy. 

Wow, talk about your red flags, right in that name!   Putting the words "Donald Trump" in that close a proximity to "Advanced...Intelligence"?   

Next red flag:

Fermi’s co-founders include Rick Perry, energy secretary during President Donald Trump’s first term, and his son Griffin. The company said construction of the world’s largest data center would begin at the site by the end of 2025. It aimed to break ground on four nuclear plants bearing Trump’s name, it said in a news release last month, “on July 4th — with the President.” Investors valued the company at more than $13 billion after its initial public offering in October, making the stakes owned by Griffin Perry and the family of chief executive Toby Neugebauer each worth billions. 

Remember I've noted before how Rick Perry is a convert to the medical use of psychedelics (or at least, ibogaine)?    That whole movement has suspiciously grifty aspects to it.

Third red flag:  that Toby Neugebauer guy:

Neugebauer, who owns a 17,000-square-foot Dallas mansion modeled after the White House, and is the son of former congressman Randy Neugebauer (R-Texas), still sits on Fermi’s board...

And get this:

Neugebauer previously founded an “anti-woke” bank called GloriFi that offered credit cards made out of bullet casings. It went bankrupt months after opening in 2022. In bankruptcy litigation, Neugebauer was accused by GloriFi’s court-appointed trustee of spinning a “fairytale” to deflect blame for the bank’s demise and “complete disregard and disdain for corporate governance.” Neugebauer has denied the allegations in court and said misconduct by others caused the bank to fail. The case is ongoing. 

Anyhoo:

...stock traders have been fleeing Fermi since and dumped more shares last week after Neugebauer was forced out by the board. Construction appears to have stalled in Texas, and Fermi, which said in federal filings that it has never generated any revenue, has been unable to secure a tech company tenant for its planned data center. Griffin Perry and other company executives have cashed out tens of millions of dollars in Fermi stock in recent weeks, according to regulatory disclosures. Shareholder lawsuits accuse the company of overhyping its prospects for success, and its stock price ended Monday 81 percent below its public debut. 

Anyone who invested in that and lost money - it's hard to have sympathy...

 

The case for what might be called "self/no self agnosticism" in Buddhism

So, I was listening to another podcast episode from Tricycle on the weekend, and it featured an American who has long been a Buddhist monk in what is called the Thai Forest Tradition (first time I've heard of that.)   His name is Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu, and I see from his Wiki page that he's 76 - way older than he sounded on the podcast, I reckon.

Anyway, the podcast episode had the title "Did the Buddha Really Teach That There is No Self?" - which is pretty intriguing, especially coming from a Buddhist monk.

It turns out, now that I have had time to Google him, that this monk has been arguing his take on this for a long time - an article here, from 1996, contains the key argument he was making in the podcast.  It's not very long, but given the inevitability of link rot, let's copy most of it here anyway:

...if you look at the Pali canon — the earliest extant record of the Buddha's teachings — you won't find them addressed at all. In fact, the one place where the Buddha was asked point-blank whether or not there was a self, he refused to answer. When later asked why, he said that to hold either that there is a self or that there is no self is to fall into extreme forms of wrong view that make the path of Buddhist practice impossible. Thus the question should be put aside.  

The Buddha divided all questions into four classes: those that deserve a categorical (straight yes or no) answer; those that deserve an analytical answer, defining and qualifying the terms of the question; those that deserve a counter-question, putting the ball back in the questioner's court; and those that deserve to be put aside. The last class of question consists of those that don't lead to the end of suffering and stress. The first duty of a teacher, when asked a question, is to figure out which class the question belongs to, and then to respond in the appropriate way. You don't, for example, say yes or no to a question that should be put aside. If you are the person asking the question and you get an answer, you should then determine how far the answer should be interpreted. The Buddha said that there are two types of people who misrepresent him: those who draw inferences from statements that shouldn't have inferences drawn from them, and those who don't draw inferences from those that should.

These are the basic ground rules for interpreting the Buddha's teachings, but if we look at the way most writers treat the anatta doctrine, we find these ground rules ignored. Some writers try to qualify the no-self interpretation by saying that the Buddha denied the existence of an eternal self or a separate self, but this is to give an analytical answer to a question that the Buddha showed should be put aside. Others try to draw inferences from the few statements in the discourse that seem to imply that there is no self, but it seems safe to assume that if one forces those statements to give an answer to a question that should be put aside, one is drawing inferences where they shouldn't be drawn.

So, instead of answering "no" to the question of whether or not there is a self — interconnected or separate, eternal or not — the Buddha felt that the question was misguided to begin with. Why? No matter how you define the line between "self" and "other," the notion of self involves an element of self-identification and clinging, and thus suffering and stress. This holds as much for an interconnected self, which recognizes no "other," as it does for a separate self. If one identifies with all of nature, one is pained by every felled tree. It also holds for an entirely "other" universe, in which the sense of alienation and futility would become so debilitating as to make the quest for happiness — one's own or that of others — impossible. For these reasons, the Buddha advised paying no attention to such questions as "Do I exist?" or "Don't I exist?" for however you answer them, they lead to suffering and stress.

To avoid the suffering implicit in questions of "self" and "other," he offered an alternative way of dividing up experience: the four Noble Truths of stress, its cause, its cessation, and the path to its cessation. Rather than viewing these truths as pertaining to self or other, he said, one should recognize them simply for what they are, in and of themselves, as they are directly experienced, and then perform the duty appropriate to each.

I take it from the podcast that there are certainly other Buddhist figures who disagree with this take, which (as I said in the title to the post) I think could be called an argument that Buddha's true position was akin to agnosticism on the self question, not "no self".

In the podcast he did make some pragmatic comments that went a bit further than that short article (there was talk of the idea of responsibility that is somewhat tied to "self" being a "skilful" thing to - how to put this? - maybe not "believe", but at least not dismiss.)  

  

Of course a chronic narcissist would interpret it this way...

From the Washington Post:

“I’ve studied assassinations, and I must tell you, the most impactful people, the people that do the most ... they’re the ones that they go after,” Trump told reporters at the White House soon after a shooting suspect was apprehended. “And I hate to say I’m honored by that, but I’ve done a lot.”
Trump mentioned Abraham Lincoln, but not Ronald Reagan, who was injured in a shooting outside the same hotel in 1981.

His MAGA cult members should understand, then: their leader kinda gets a kick out of the attention a shooting attempt brings, so why complain about the number of Americans just trying to keep him happy that way?

China AI gets positive review

There's an article in the New York Times that has a positive take on China advancing into open source AI.  

The only thing I find a bit confusing about this is that I associate "open source" with "free", but you still have to pay open source AI if you're more than a light user, because, obviously, it costs to run it.   So, how does the "free to modify" aspect of open source AI models even work?  What is it that they modify, and where does the modification reside, so to speak.  

I'll have to ask an AI to explain!  

Anyway, some extracts from the NYT:

On Friday, DeepSeek released a preview of V4, its long-awaited follow-up model, which it intends to open source. The new model excels at writing computer code, an increasingly important skill for leading A.I. systems. It significantly outperformed every other open-source system at generating code, according to tests from Vals AI, a company that tracks the performance of A.I. technologies.

DeepSeek released its new model just days after Moonshot AI, another Chinese start-up, introduced its latest open-source model, Kimi 2.6. While these systems trail the coding capabilities of the leading U.S. models from Anthropic and OpenAI, the gap is narrowing.....

The competition to build the best-performing A.I. systems has transformed into a geopolitical power struggle. While Silicon Valley leaders at Anthropic and OpenAI warn that their technology would be dangerous in the hands of autocratic countries, China has invested billions to become an A.I. superpower, viewing the technology as a critical engine of economic growth.

DeepSeek’s open-source models are central to this strategy. While many Western companies guard their most valuable models, China has embraced open source and almost all of its top-performing systems are widely available.....

From Lagos to Kuala Lumpur, developers on tight budgets are turning to Chinese open-source models because they are cheaper to run and therefore easier to experiment with. Last May, Malaysia’s deputy minister of communications said the country’s sovereign A.I. infrastructure would be built on DeepSeek’s technology.

Chinese open-source models accounted for roughly one-third of global A.I. usage last year, according to a study by OpenRouter, an A.I. model marketplace. DeepSeek was the most widely used, followed by models from Alibaba, the Chinese internet company.

The article does mention Kimi, which is the Chinese AI I have spent most time trying.  I think it is not bad for certain things, and I even paid to use it for a month or two, but I don't think I will continue.

For what it is worth, this is what I am currently finding:

*   best AI service for research that will always provide the links for its responses and conclusions:                 still Perplexity.   (I am somewhat tempted to subscribe to it, but I saw a video that its policies were             voraciously unfair - along the lines of "anything you upload can be used by us" I think.  So, I don't             know.)

 * best service for drafting a document or clause for an agreement, or for summarising a lengthy                    document: Claude.   Essentially, it is the best one for English expression, I find.  It is also perhaps the         best for creative writing suggestions.  It's research can be quite good too.   

 *  best AI for technical questions (like, how do you address a computer or software issue):  Kimi.   

 *  worst AI for reliable research answers:  the Google/Gemini? AI that gives answers to a Google search.      It's answers can be remarkably and confidently wrong.  It really puts me off relying on Gemini as a            standalone AI.

I haven't used Chat GPT much lately.   It was the best for silly stuff - like if you wanted an AI to read your tarot cards, or converse while taking the role of a historical figure.  But for real use - not very confident in it. 

 

 

Odd things at X

Speaking of social media, as I was in the last post, I mainly look at X to see what the mad Right (and the appalling Elon Musk) is telling itself,  and I do visit daily.   The number of sensible people still using it seems to be diminishing even further.  (I should up my presence on Bluesky, which I still consider unfairly maligned.)    

But I have noticed in the last few weeks how the "for you" feed in X seems to have had a big increase in what I might call "story posts" - people (apparently) talking about what their husband/wife/child did the other day, and stuff like life lessons that came out of it.  A lot of them are non political - and most have no interest to me at all.  And many feel of dubious authenticity, too.

It seems that the algorithm is trying to "humanise" the place, or something?  But it just feels bland and of no interest.  

I wonder if anyone else has noticed?  Let me check.  Google's AI tells me it is not my imagination:

Yes, many users have observed a significant increase in personal, non-political "story posts" about family and life in the X (formerly Twitter) "For You" feed, a shift aligned with major algorithmic updates in early 2026. 

This change is not coincidental; it is part of a deliberate move to make X more engaging and less politically charged, resembling a "text-based TikTok". Here is why you are seeing more of these posts: 

• New "Grok-Powered" Algorithm: In January 2026, X replaced its legacy system with an AI-driven, Transformer model (Phoenix update) that reads posts and matches them to user interests, actively prioritizing content that generates conversation and "real" interaction.
• Prioritizing Personal Connection: The algorithm now favors authentic, personal stories (often referred to as "storytelling" or personality content) over just news or politics, aiming for higher dwell time and "relatable" content.
• Reduced Political Focus: The 2026 algorithm update, influenced by a new product strategy, seeks to foster a more "welcoming" space, often filtering out or reducing the velocity of polarizing content in favor of higher-quality, personal engagements.
• "Story" Post Structure: The platform is actively pushing conversational, story-like structures that encourage replies and shares, which the new AI deems "higher quality". 

 Can't we just have old Twitter back?? 

Random entertainment stuff

*   Ooh!  A couple of years ago I posted about enjoying following Scott Bradlee's Postmodern Jukebox on Youtube, and even said that I could imagine going to one of his live touring concerts would be a good night out.

Now I get to find out for real!  I look at my Facebook feed more often than I used to now, because it has in a sense replaced the "local news feed" (or specialist news) aspect that Twitter used to (kind of) provide.  (Truth be told, most of my feed is about either Singapore, Malaysia, China, or to a lesser extent, Brisbane.)   Anyway, it was via a Facebook ad that I found they are touring Australia mid 2026, and will be at Brisbane City Hall (an appropriate venue for their updated retro style) on July 8.  Tickets already secured.   Happy, happy.

*   On another musical theme, there is a surprisingly interesting Youtube out about C Pop (China pop) and why it is the way it is.   Explains how the different dialects affect song writing, the changing media influence on what is big in pop (such as Hong Kong movie themes being very big in the past, but that industry has died), and how the biggest Chinese pop star is well known for dealing with tricky issues with the use of language in songs by "mumble-rapping" in such a way that no one can understand the lyrics without looking them up!   All rather interesting; and my interest in the world of Chinese pop all started by really liking a few Malaysian Chinese songs.   This one especially.   (Singaporean pop, as far as I can tell, is much more into the downer ballard style than the happy pop that seems bigger in Malaysia.)

*  I don't think I talk enough about how likeable and um, worthy?, admirable? The Pitt is. And today I stumbled across this amusing, but I think affectionate, parody which I am sure most fans will like:

 

Local homeless history

I didn't realise that the housing situation in Brisbane at the end of WW2 was as dire as this article at The Conversation indicates, with lots of people living in shanty towns.  (The only area that would probably qualify as such in my lifetime was Cribb Island - where I think not that many people owned the rather ramshackle houses they lived in. The area has long since been covered by the grounds of Brisbane Airport, but I did go to primary school with at least a couple of Cribb Island kids.)  

Here are some extracts:

The housing shortage in Brisbane alone was calculated at 13,500 houses in 1945 – a time when the city’s population was 380,000 people. New house construction was “not keeping pace with the needs of a growing population”. By 1949, an estimated 30,000 to 40,000 people were considered homeless.

During World War II, Brisbane was a major United States military base. After the war, pressure mounted to convert abandoned sites, such as the US Army camp at Barrambin (Victoria Park), into temporary housing for families.

At first, the state government refused, stating that facilities designed for men would need upgrades if they were to be used by women and children. Undeterred, families started squatting in these disused facilities across the city.

My research identified a total of 11 informal settlements across Brisbane in this postwar period, including eight housing camps in former military facilities, and three on public parkland.

Living conditions were poor. Residents relied on kerosene stoves and there was no running water.

In 1947, dozens of children were hospitalised with gastroenteritis – and 14 died.

Faced with rising public pressure, including a campaign led by the Courier Mail, authorities recognised the futility of threatening eviction and began taking a position of tolerance.

The Queensland Housing Commission requisitioned military camps. Brisbane City Council and the Queensland government supplied drinking water, toilets and tents to families camping in the bush on the city’s fringe.

Oh, and here is more about Cribb Island, from one of the linked articles above:  

Cribb Island was initially known as “the poor man's seaside resort” (So you know your Brisbane, 1929). Connected to the mainland side of Moreton Bay through land reclamation works which were often submerged during high tide, Cribb Island was located 15 km from Brisbane's city centre but remained an isolated community (Jolliffe, 1980). At its peak Cribb Island had a Methodist church (1918), state school (1919), a post office (1920), Catholic church (1936), Catholic school (1952), police station, medical clinic, cinema, general store (1930s) and a bus service. Most dwellings were considered substandard and referred to as “humpies”. Following a Brisbane City Council order to demolish 100 dwellings at Cribb Island in 1929, locals protested claiming Cribb Island was “a health resort on the seashore” where the ordinance did not apply, and that “Many parts of Brisbane were wretched slums, compared with their little township which they kept spotless” (Cribb Island - Council Evictions, 1929).  

Well, I would never have guessed it had a cinema once!   And I doubt the Catholic School was still going into the 1960's - otherwise the few classmates I had from there would presumably not have needed to come.

Anyway, all rather interesting... 

 

 

Highly dubious treatment endorsed by President we can only wish would rise to the level of "highly dubious"

Joe Rogan will probably start gushing over Trump again because he got him to sign a (possibly fairly meaningless?) directive to get his former drug taking, brain worm attacked, Health Secretary to look into getting ibogaine approved as an elixir for mental health:

President Trump signed an executive order on Saturday calling for the acceleration of research on certain psychedelic drugs as treatments for depression and other conditions. Podcaster Joe Rogan stood with him as he signed the order—and Trump indicated that Rogan was a major inspiration behind the push to fast-track legalizing ibogaine, which is used outside the United States to treat post-traumatic stress disorder.

Rogan has championed ibogaine for years. A year ago, on his podcast, he said “Ibogaine, in particular, has helped a lot of people. It gives you, like, a review of your life, apparently.” Two weeks ago, he interviewed the CEO of Americans for Ibogaine, who also stood by as Trump signed his order to ease access to the drug. 

I posted a few months about the bizarre way the American Right has rushed to endorse it, despite its obviously seriously dangerous side effect of stopping (some) hearts:

Because ibogaine lengthens the time between heartbeats, a user who gets the wrong dosage, is taking other drugs, or whose heart rate is not being monitored during treatment, can go into cardiac arrest. Even under the most scrupulous of circumstances, ibogaine therapy is a long and grueling inward journey that Ms. Sinema described as “the opposite of a pleasant experience.”  

It has other possible dangers too:

Ibogaine’s most significant barrier to clinical adoption is its safety profile. The drug is known to prolong the QT interval on electrocardiograms, increasing the risk of fatal arrhythmias such as torsades de pointes [18], [19]. Sudden cardiac deaths have been reported in individuals undergoing ibogaine therapy, particularly those with underlying cardiovascular disease, electrolyte imbalances, or concurrent substance use [20], [21]. Ibogaine also exhibits neurotoxicity at high doses in preclinical models, particularly in cerebellar Purkinje cells, and has been associated with adverse neurological events in humans, including ataxia, tremors, and psychosis [22], [23].

 

The drug’s complex pharmacokinetics—marked by a long half-life and active metabolites—further complicate dosing. Inadequate medical supervision, polypharmacy, and pre-existing health conditions can increase toxicity risk. A review of ibogaine-related fatalities emphasized the need for pre-treatment cardiac screening, inpatient monitoring, and electrolyte management to reduce adverse outcomes [16].

And are the results really worth the risk?

Two double-blind, placebo-controlled trials—one in opioid-dependent individuals and another in cocaine users—reported modest reductions in dependence symptoms, although both were underpowered and inconclusive due to small sample sizes and methodological limitations [12]. 

I wonder how you do a double blinded placebo test for a drug that, if you have the real one, makes you feel deathly sick and tripping?   I mean, I guess you could mimic the nausea by a vomit inducing drug in the placebo, but surely you can't replicate the hallucinogenic aspect unless you use another hallucinogen.

A retrospective survey of 88 individuals treated with ibogaine in Mexico found that 54 % remained abstinent from opioids for six months or more, and 30 % reported complete long-term abstinence [14]. A qualitative study involving 73 individuals documented long-lasting psychological benefits such as enhanced emotional regulation, increased meaning in life, and greater authenticity, suggesting ibogaine’s potential role in improving psychological well-being beyond substance use cessation [15]. 

 Increased authenticity?   

Now the problem is that there are no doubt some people with serious problems who legitimately gain an insight this way that they can't imagine gaining in any other, so it feels wrong to dismiss its potential totally -  but when you're talking about a drug with serious potential side effects, this seems right up there with the "worst" of them.    (The articles all suggest that the way forward may be to work on analogues to the drug that don't have the heart stopping side effect - but it sure sounds as if that will be a slow process.)

But it's clear that, as with all of the revival in interest in psychedelics, there are vested interests promising way too much way too early.  And making money has a lot to do with it. Back to the Mother Earth article:

 Billionaire tech investor Peter Thiel has spent the better part of the past decade investing heavily in psychedelic pharmaceutical companies. He’s a major backer of Compass Pathways, a British company seeking to commercialize psilocybin, the psychoactive ingredient in magic mushrooms, in particular for therapeutic use. He’s also invested in AtaiBeckley, a German company working on hallucinogens. On Thursday, the stocks of both companies spiked on news that Trump would likely be giving his stamp of approval to ibogaine this weekend.   

I guess I can't say that it's always a safe bet to bet again whatever Trump endorses healthwise, given that he was a proponent of COVID vaccines until he decided that anti-vaxxers are more his type of people (that is, dumb and prone to conspiracy beliefs.)  But really, Trump hardly gives off a sense of, um, common sense when he makes jokes like this:

At the White House Saturday, Trump didn’t talk much about the money behind all this. Instead, he asked if he could get some ibogaine.

“Can I have some, please?” he said. “I’ll do whatever it takes…I don’t have time to be depressed. If you stay busy enough, maybe that’s what works too, that’s what I do.”  

  

Rice and meat - a recipe note

I haven't tried a new recipe for a while, and I liked the look of a Middle Eastern dish called chicken or beef kabsa.  As one site says:

Beef Kabsa is a traditional Saudi dish that consists of beef cooked with tomato sauce & different aromatic spices, and then combining it with long-grain rice cooked in a flavorful broth. It is considered a national dish of Saudi Arabia, that is served during family gatherings and important occasions. 

I'm not sure how different it is from biryani.  Certainly, they are very similar dishes.

Most, but not all, Youtube videos showed one ingredient as being dried whole lemons or limes, which are not always that easy to find.  But Google pointed in the right direction - to a shop dealing mainly with Iranian food at Acacia Ridge. (I felt sorry for them for the likelihood of having relatives still there living under great uncertainty.)   It also had an Afghan restaurant, and a butcher that sold lamb and beef cut in lots of different ways, and at good price too.  It pays to shop "ethnic".

Anyway, I just followed a combination of Youtube channel videos as to how to make it.  (I avoided the one which had subtitles saying "add 1.5 kg of baby meat".)

Here's how it goes, more or less:

1.     Fry a diced onion in plenty of oil, along with a cinnamon stick, two or three dried lemons/limes, half a dozen cloves and half a dozen cardamom pods.  (There seems to be no precision to how much of these initial spices are added.)

2.    At some point, add diced garlic - again seems up to you how much - and the chopped meat to get it seared a bit.

3.    I would probably add salt at this point too (or even have salted the meat for a while before frying), although some recipes just had it added to the broth.

4.    Add a couple of table spoons of tomato paste to fry it a bit, and the other powdered spices.  It seems cumin, coriander, and pepper are essential.  Most recipes add something else - either paprika or kashmiri chilli powder (which is not very hot) - and also some tumeric.   As to how much to add - I really guessed, from watching videos, but it seems to me reading their notes now I may have overdone it a bit.  I did a level tablespoon of cumin, coriander and paprika, about a couple of teaspoons of pepper, and a bit less than a teaspoon of tumeric.  However, it seems that for a kg of meat (the amount I cooked), many recipes in the notes said only a  teaspoon of the main spices (the cumin, coriander and paprika).  I think that's too little.  

5.    Fry it for a while, then add two or three chopped tomatoes, and let them boil down.

6.    Add a chopped capsicum, cover the meat with hot water from the kettle, and let it cook for about an hour.

7.    Meanwhile, soak two cups of washed basmati rice for 30 minutes or so.  

8.    Here's where more variations occur:  some recipes just have the drained, soaked rice thrown in the pot, perhaps even with a little bit more hot water, and initially cook it at high heat to reduce the liquid a bit, then on low heat (covered) for about 20 to 30 minutes to steam the rice.  Other recipes have the meat removed from the pot, the broth strained of solids and returned to the pot with the meat, and then the rice added.   I did something in between - strained it to see how much liquid I had, but then returned some of the solids, including the cinnamon stick and cardamom.    I might just leave it all in next time.

9.   A lot of recipes also add a few hot chillis on top at this stage (after adding the rice).  I had some not so hot green ones, and yes, they look good and added more flavour.  (For chilli heat, I had diced a couple of dried red chillis when I added the tomatoes. I forgot that.)

Anyway - despite my concerns about liquid to rice ratio, it seems basmati is more forgiving than paella rice (which I always find hard to cook to a suitable "not wet" texture.) 

So yeah, it came out pretty well....   

  

So many things I don't know much about

Two examples:

I learned this morning from watching a Youtube video (by someone I don't recall watching before) a succinct history of the development of lighthouses.  It included the point that the very heavy rotating light mechanism worked by floating it in a pool of mercury.  And that the resulting mercury fumes have been speculated as contributing to at least some cases of lighthouse keeper madness.   (A pity that I didn't learn this from The Lighthouse!)

Here is the video.  (The torch he has looks very cool - if slightly dangerous - too.)   

  

 

The second example - from a review of yet another book about Rasputin: 

Beevor’s narrative goes on to show that in fact, the downfall of Emperor Nicholas II and Empress Alexandra was overdetermined. Their reign was a parade of disasters, from the fatal stampede after Nicholas’s coronation that killed more than a thousand people to Nicholas’s decision to continue playing dominoes as the revolution began in February 1917. Beevor quotes one cleareyed contemporary who observed that “the problem was not Rasputin, but the regime that made Rasputin’s influence possible.” 

I've never read much about Russian history, and feel that a lot of people know about the fall of the Romanovs because of the inherent drama and ambiguity of the role of Rasputin.  But I feel I should have heard about the fatal coronation stampede before... 

More cannabis takes from American MSM

This article at the Washington Post is of interest: The surprising ways cannabis may affect the ageing brain.

I thought it read as relatively balanced, and showed that there are still some very significant gaps in understanding.  It also reconfirmed the thing that seems universally agreed - use at a young age (like, teenagers) is very problematic.  

The comments is full of aggressive complaints about the article, however.   As I have noted many times before, health-cautionary articles on it use frequently get attacked this way in the US.