That is, once you know the intrinsically damaging nature of boxing as a sport, how can you intellectually consider it as a endeavour worthy of support?
Chronic traumatic brain injury (CTBI) associated with boxing occurs in approximately 20% of professional boxers.
The repeated head blows sustained by fighters during their battles link to slower cognitive processing speeds and smaller volumes of certain brain parts.Not sure that I would ban it if I were Benevolent Ruler of the World. Perhaps pay for an advertising campaign designed to shame people out of supporting the sport, though. Or put money into developing exoskeleton boxing. (I have my doubts that people are ever going to get sufficient thrill out of watching boxing robots, like in that silly Real Steel movie. Maybe if they build in blood bags ready to be splattered?) But what if there's a human in a suit designed to prevent a head taking a full blow? But why am I worried about satisfying the desire for biffo anyway? It's all something to do with testosterone and evolutionary biology I suppose, and I feel I need to accept that in some fashion or other.
OK, here's a compromise: professional boxing allowed, but it's mandated by law that it has to end with a bonobo style, bonding-despite-the-fight-we-just-had, same-sex love in between the competitors before they leave the ring.
There, the problem of professional boxing solved. (I'm sure Jason Soon will be impressed.)