Now at the risk of readers thinking I'm obsessing about Tomorrowland (which has now dropped down to 59% approval, making it a Rottentomato "miss") or George Clooney, I have been meaning to observe for a quite a while that the Rottentomatoes site has gone increasingly wonky over the last year or two.
First, the number of times the "key quote" seems quite contrary to whether the movie has been scored positive or negative seems to have increased, a lot.
Secondly, the number of well known movie reviewers who appear there has been heading down, down, down. In their place are some folk who come from backwater sites most people have never heard of.
Thirdly, when you use the app version, you get a different bunch of reviews from the web version (I think.) Or at least, last I looked, Australian reviewers got priority.
I had forgotten about the Metacritic site, but it still seems to feature prominent critics only, and takes the immensely sensible approach of calling a mixed review "mixed" instead of trying to count it only as a "hit" or "miss". Someone still gives reviews a number, and I guess if I read the site more carefully I might have a problem with some of those ratings, but still it seems a lot more sensible system than what Rottentomatoes has become.
And Metacritic still has Tomorrowland at 62. So there...