Sunday, November 29, 2015

Matt Ridley is wrong

If wishes were horses | …and Then There's Physics

Ridley's got another short "what's the problem?  AGW won't get dangerous for another century" article which will only convince the ignorant, like Adam Creighton, but he got to run it in Scientific American.

The explanation of why he is a wrong-headed dissembler is given at the link above.

I've never enjoyed Scientific American much, but really, publishing failed banker and coal miner Ridley on climate change?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...


Your old friend CL is reporting at Catallaxy that Jum Hansen, gerbil warming grandpa, is worried gerbil warming could threaten us with giant boulders. It's called the gerbil warming boulder theory.

What do you think?

By the way, Tiny Dancer said to say high.