I watched bits and pieces of (one of the) interviews that got MY into trouble, and there's no doubt from it that, despite protestations made now (designed to try to save his lucrative book deal, presumably), he expressed no great moral concern about pederasty with consent, given the way he was talking about his enthusiastic participation in it as a 14 year old, and his reluctance to criticise the man (a priest, even) he claims it was with. His statement today that he was the victim of the priest is just completely at odds with how he conducted himself in the interview, where he was happy to paint himself as the knowing instigator of enjoyable sexual encounters as a precocious young (gay) teenager. He explained this as part of his then rebelliousness, but expressed no shame or regret.
He may genuinely despise paedophiles, for all I know, and he's hardly the first* gay man** to make the distinction between paedophilia and pederasty, and grant some sympathy to the latter. But I would bet he's the first openly gay man making money on the American wingnut media circuit to muse along those lines and not realise it was going to go over like a lead balloon.
I said before his writing seemed like that of an intellectual lightweight; the abrupt (possible?) ending of his career this way helps confirm he's a bit short on the smarts.
So, no great loss to society that he's lost his book deal, and (I would hope) a job at Breitbart.
About time he got a real job, preferably one completely out of the public eye. It's not good for his soul.***
* As Gerard Henderson likes to go on and on about, pederasts were seeking understanding, if not sympathy, via public appearances back in the 1970's in the media, including - gasp! - the ABC
** I was tempted to say "public intellectual", but that would be extremely generous, if not sarcastic
*** Which, evidently, he believes in, given that he claims at heart to still be a Catholic
Update: I see from a Spectator piece on this that Jason Soon linked to, this comment about the people on the Right who are still supporting Milo despite his pederasty comments:
Those people – and I think they’re a tiny minority – are either childishly innocent or hopelessly stupid. There’s no kinder way to say it. Either way, their opinion doesn’t matter.Can you guess which choice I go for? [Lots of support for MY still in the Catallaxy threads.]