But here is what one site has quoted:
HOUSTON -- Peter Thiel, the technology investor and advisor to President Donald Trump, questioned the global push toward restricting carbon emissions as "group think" while speaking Tuesday at an international energy conference here.I suppose I should be cautious and note that perhaps he is not being entirely serious with that last line.
"I'm not sure I'm an extreme skeptic of climate change, but I have my doubts about the extreme ways that people try to push it through," he said. "Even if climate change is quite as bad as people think it is, if we group think we're more likely to misdiagnose the problem. Maybe it's methane emissions, and the real problem is eating steak."
But he supports Trump, so why should I give him any benefit of the doubt? No, I'm going with the Greek yoghurt theory - he's rich and thick.
"Not an extreme skeptic" = fence sitting lukewarmer, happy to watch temperatures rise with no carbon pricing because "taxes - I hate taxes", and then say "well, they were right 30 years ago - too late to do anything about CO2 now. Here, I've got this great geoengineering idea I can sell you. Please pay in bitcoin to my floating island in Tahiti. See ya."
Update: other reports don't repeat the "steak" comment, which is odd. From Axios:
"I don't know whether I am an extreme skeptic on climate change, but I have my doubts about the extreme way that people try to push it through, and I would say that I would be much more convinced of climate change, of the need to do something, if I thought there was a more open debate in which both sides were given a full hearing."And other sites point out that he has provided funding for some clean energy ideas (some sounding very improbable.)
But no, he is simply not to be trusted on climate change. Or anything much, in my books...