I watched Inception with my son last night, the first time I have viewed it since seeing it at the cinema in 2010. I enjoyed rewatching it more than I expected, then decided to go back to read what I had said about it first time around.
Boy, I feel I was a bit harsh, in retrospect. The film still looks great - really great, actually; and I found myself enjoying its level of complexity and generally "cool" vibe. I felt more admiration for DiCaprio's acting this time around, too. In my earlier review, was I reacting a bit too much against some very high praise it received? Possibly - I see it got 86% on Rottentomatoes - it's good but not that good.
Furthermore, I still think it is indisputable that the final level of dream "inception" - the meant-to-be climatic snowy fortress sequence - was a really major mistake. The movie just starts looking like a complete James Bond rip off, and despite the (I still say rather poorly directed or edited) action happening around the mountains, it actually loses narrative momentum within a few minutes of them popping up in that location.
A good, basically clever, movie, but one that could have been great, with some modifications.
Does this mean I would like Interstellar if I watch it again in 6 years time?
PS: my son - now 17 - liked it a lot; but then again, he knew it was by Christopher Nolan, and he knows he can annoy me by overpraising his work. Especially Interstellar.