Something to worry about? Well, yes:Phytoplankton activity fluctuates widely according to season and location, making long-term monitoring of trends difficult. An earlier study2, based on satellite observations of ocean colour, suggested a link between climate variability and ocean productivity, but this was limited to observations from 1997 to 2006. Boris Worm, a marine biologist at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada, and his team have now combined satellite-derived observations of phytoplankton with historical shipboard measurements stretching back to the pioneering days of oceanography.
The research reveals an unsettling centennial downwards trend, superimposed on shorter-term variability. The scientists found that the average global phytoplankton concentration in the upper ocean currently declines by around 1% per year. Since 1950 alone, algal biomass decreased by around 40%, probably in response to ocean warming — and the decline has gathered pace in recent years.
"Clearly, 40% is a huge number," says Paul Falkowski, an oceanographer at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey. "This implies that the entire ocean system is out of steady state, slowing down.
"This is severely disquieting," adds Victor Smetacek, a marine biologist at the Alfred Wegener Institute of Polar and Marine Research in Bremerhaven, Germany. "One must really digest the very magnitude of this decline and its possible implications."The culprit is believed to be ocean warming:
In most regions tested, the phytoplankton decline seems to be the result of a 0.5–1.0 °C warming of the upper ocean over the past century. The warming leads to enhanced vertical 'stratification' of ocean layers, thus limiting the supply of nutrients from deeper waters to the surface.No one is pointing the finger at ocean acidification yet, and (from memory) experiments with bubbling CO2 through phytoplankton have had mixed results. But there was this story recently that increased acidification may affect the availability of iron, which phytoplankton need to grow well. (There is more detail on that study at my earlier post.) So, I wonder if acidification over the last century is part of the explanation.But ocean warming does not explain reduced productivity in regions, including the Arctic Ocean, where algal growth is mainly constrained by sunlight. So scientists must try to find out what other drivers, such as changes in wind and ocean circulation, might force the decline, says Falkowski.
(a) according to HadISST (Hadley centre) SST has increased by 0.5 degrees in the last 100 years.
ReplyDeleteAnd that kills off nearly half the plankton?
(b) No one noticed that nearly half the bottom layer of the ocean food pyramid has disappeared? Do you realise that means, among other things, there will be about half as many sharks around?
Robert,
ReplyDeleteto make a complex phenomena simple: acids and iron result in iron oxide (rust).
I think the iron gets oxidized before the plants can eat it ... the same happens with the Carbonate ion, CO3-². The carbonate ion necessary to form the hard part of coral, snails, barnacles, … is consumed by CO2 before the animals can eat it. At the other hand the algea symbiont (a plant) on coral reef suffers from temperature stress ... It is a paradox because plants need CO2 and like hot.