It seems like Andrew Bolt's climate denier reading is very limited. He's relying on a Christopher Booker column which in turn is relying on Steven Goddard analysis of temperature adjustments.
I would say it's pretty clear that Bolt does not know that Steven Goddard made so many mistakes and refused to acknowledge them that Anthony Watts will not run any of his material at Watts Up With That. Furthermore, a recent specific series of Goddard posts on the US temperature record was taken apart as being plainly in error at Lucia's Blackboard. (In fact, it was there that Watts dropped by to confirm he would have nothing of Goddard's on his blog, and this has been the case for a year or two now.)
Bolt also quotes from Jennifer Marohasy - the Australia scientist whose credibility seems to have dwindled away, more due to her work on the Murray Darling, as far as I can tell.
Here's a hint Andrew: if a pretend scientist has made so many wrong claims that even Anthony Watts stops using his material, he is not to be trusted on anything.
Do try to keep up to date on the current state of denialism, won't you?
1 comment:
Good takedown in the Guardian.
Post a Comment