Monday, November 24, 2014

Henry's rubbery figure?

Henry Ergas lines up for duty for some Obama /clean energy bashing in today's Australian, but what caught my eye was this line:
But it works a treat with the billionaires Obama courts, who helped the Democrats outspend the Republicans by some 35 per cent in last month’s elections.
Really?  When I Google the question (with, for example:  "did Republicans outspend Democrats in midterm elections" - because, I guess, most people would assume Republicans did)  I can't see any article that talks about a 35% outspend by Democrats.  In fact, nearly every article quotes the Centre for Responsive Politic's estimates that Republicans slightly outspent Democrats.   Even the Washington Times, a paper with (I think) even less credibility for objectivity than the Australian, if that's possible.

Even Googling using the 35% figure, I can't find any reference quickly.

It's clear that "dark money" donations in the US are hard to track, but even so, I just can't see anyone estimating that 35% Democrat outspend figure.

So it would good to know where Ergas gets this figure from.   Fox News?  Breitbart?  You know, the reliable sources...

4 comments:

  1. Henry's nose daily.

    I caught him out a number of times where what he states is wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous3:33 pm

    Steve

    So because you aren't able to track the info, it must be wrong? Is that what you mean?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I would have thought the use of a question mark in the post heading answers your question, anon.

    Because it's Ergas, it must be right? Is that what you mean?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ergas has a direct line to Abbott's suppository, which seems to be where most of his wisdom comes from.

    He is a total irrelevance.

    ReplyDelete