Let's see: * I thought the Mission Impossible 6 trailer looked pretty good - although you realise that Cruise has set ridiculous tough standards for topping the last movie's stunt sequences when you see him dangling off a helicopter and think "meh, hanging onto the outside of the military transport looked scarier." But don't worry, I'm in the cinema in the first week of release.
* Chris Hemsworth was being interviewed on Sunrise this morning. He does seem to be a ridiculously nice guy. Of course, he's an actor and spends months away at a time - you would have to fear that one marriage for him will not be enough. No, no, I'm trying to be cheerful, I forgot.
* Yes, I have started to worry that I have spent years drinking my hot drinks while they are too hot:
Very hot tea can raise risk of oesophageal cancer, suggests studyCombined with excess alcohol consumption, scaldingly hot tea raises relative risk fivefold, says Chinese researchersWait - that's not cheerful at all.
The search for cheerful will continue...
Update: again, not cheerful - how that Cloverfield 3 movie that I had hopes for (Chris O'Dowd as an astronaut notwithstanding) has appeared on Netflix and is getting uniformly bad reviews. Dang.
Update 2: this does make me happier - when a female who used to like Tarantino films finally realises something and downgrades her opinion:
When I watched, white knuckles gripping my laptop, the footage of Uma Thurman's car crash on the set of Kill Bill, it struck me that Quentin Tarantino has been revealing himself to us through his art all these years.
It was only a day or so before Thurman's revelations that I had been discussing the writer/director's work with a filmmaker friend and we both realised we'd cooled on his shtick considerably, for two main reasons: his obsession with the N-word, and his obsession with sexualised violence.
While chatting to my friend, I copped to enjoying Tarantino's latest film, The Hateful Eight, largely for the spectacle of its 70mm cinematography, but that I also agreed with New York Times critic A. O. Scott's description of the film as "an orgy of elaborately justified misogyny". On reflection, it really did seem like Tarantino had designed the chamber piece specifically to explore one woman's abuse at the hands of seven men.
Then, I remembered how Harvey Weinstein himself had waved off accusations of Hateful Eight's misogyny, calling it "fishing for stupidity". ...
....no matter how Tarantino might defend his blood-spattered back catalogue as pro-woman or true cinematic equality, violence in the QT pantheon so often seems to be, with a few exceptions, something done by men to women. ...
Now, I'm not about to accuse QT of dreaming of cracking a gun butt over a woman's head (The Hateful Eight), scalping her (Kill Bill), murdering her in his muscle car (Death Proof) or branding and whipping her (Django Unchained). Indeed, plenty of people have called Tarantino a feminist director specifically because of his plethora of female characters and willingness to treat them just as badly as their male counterparts.
But a theme, as it were, has emerged: Tarantino loves to put his female characters through hell. We know now, from Thurman's account of his on-set behaviour, that he also likes to do the same to at least one of his actresses in the name of authenticity in performance.
pretty boring films
ReplyDeleteThis is typical SJW ex post facto re reading which I thought you of all people would be immune to Steve. what's the point of social conservatives if they're not immune to this feminazi hysteria?
ReplyDeleteI have enjoyed all Tarantino movies and have never thought about/noticed/relished this alleeged misogyny crap. It's quite simple. those of us who like movies with action/violence like to see people beat and shoot each other up and the pretext for beating/shooting each other up that is a good pretext. some of this involves man vs woman. whether it man vs woman, man vs man, woman vs woman, tranny vs man etc doesn't matter. we just like the action/violence as catharsis as art. the whole misogyny thing doesn't even figure.
as this SJW feminazi crap becomes more well established I am increasingly feeling more of an allegiance to conservatives as a counter as the libertarians are infected with this crap too
Calm down, Jason. Her article is not OTT condemnation of Tarantino (I'd have no objection if it were, really - you and I don't see eye to eye on the matter of movie violence and revenge themes) - it's just that she realised something she hadn't realised before.
ReplyDeleteThat can happen - there can be recurring elements in a directors work that it can some time to recognize and then question why they keep returning to it.
Also - you made mention of your not "relishing" the alleged misogyny. Obviously, nor did the writer - it's clear she liked [most of?] the films when she watched them, and it was only on reflection that she realised something stretching back over most of his work. She's hardly likely in those circumstances to be accusing other viewers of being dirtbags for watching his films - and she notes that many argue he is a feminist director, but she thinks that is a tad disingenuous now. Seems a pretty reasonable argument she is making about his films - the point she makes about his motives for putting Uma in the car may arguably be less fair. (She - Uma - has forgiven him for it, but they didn't speak much for a couple of years after it happened.)
ReplyDeleteBTW, what's this about libertarians being infected with SJW-ism too?
ReplyDeleteNot something I've noticed...