Second, why isn't this story of the man baby bully making more appearances in the mainstream media?:
President Trump reportedly tossed Starburst candies to German Chancellor Angela Merkel during his tense meeting with Group of Seven (G-7) leaders weeks ago, Eurasia Group President Ian Bremmer said Wednesday.Third: I find it weird how, for conservative pro-Life Catholics, the issue of abortion distorts their moral judgment completely. Because the Left supports abortion rights, they (pro-Lifers) act as if this makes all appalling treatment of the living by the any figure on the Right excusable as being relatively minor, in their eyes. It's always a case of "but you can't complain about that, because you want to see babies killed!"
While appearing on CBS News, Bremmer painted a grim picture of Trump and Merkel’s relationship amid heightened conflict between the president and other G-7 members over his steep steel and aluminum tariffs and suggestion that Russia be reinstated into the group.
Bremmer went on to describe a bizarre incident toward the end of the summit, when Merkel and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau joined some of other the allies “to press Trump directly to sign the [group] communique that talked about the commitment to a rules-based international order.”
“Trump was sitting there with his arms crossed, clearly not liking the fact that they were ganging up on him,” Bremmer said to the news outlet. “He eventually agreed and said OK, he’ll sign it. And at that point, he stood up, put his hand in his pocket, his suit jacket pocket, and he took two Starburst candies out, threw them on the table and said to Merkel, ‘Here, Angela. Don’t say I never give you anything.’ ”
“The relationship is about as dysfunctional as we’ve seen between America and its major allies since the trans-Atlantic relationship really started after World War II,” Bremmer continued.
This dynamic has been clear at Catallaxy for many, many years, most routinely deployed by 1950's blow in CL. But I see it turns up at Hot Air too:
His point about thinking twice before handing power to a party that would take kids away from their parents with no plan to reunite them and maybe with no ability to reunite them is well taken. His suggestion to replace them with a party that condones abortion on demand at any point during pregnancy — “the only party left in America that stands for what is right and decent,” Schmidt would have you believe — is not.What's weird about this is Popes themselves do not take this attitude. All Popes talk of abortion as appalling evil that they want to see ended - but it never stops them issuing teachings on, and condemning, other immoral behaviour, whether it be about social justice in terms of economics, climate change, use of social media, whatever.
And so I'll end with a David Roberts tweet on this very topic:
Update: entirely predictable, but even after this current Pope condemns the child separation policy, those walking ugly advertisements of modern Conservative Catholics as inanely supportive of cruelty and entirely gullible from Catallaxy chime in:
DB sounds like a genuine Catholic proto-fascist these days: uses "bugmen" all the time, which ties in with Trump's dehumanising terminology for undocumented immigrants. It's extremely ugly, and dumb. But that's his brand of modern conservatism for you.
Asylum seekers are committing no crime.
ReplyDeleteThey are catholics so their biblical understanding is poor
Homer - that's a bit rich, given it was American protestants quoting Romans to justify the child separation policy.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, the point is more to the way Right wing conservative Catholics are highly selective in what they want to take seriously from Papal teachings of the last century or so. Abortion? - sure, that's very very serious and the most important issue ever. Gays - really, really serious too.
But the role of government in acting for the common good, economics, work, climate change, refugees, social justice in a global sense - they basically reject the pretty balanced, centrist views of modern Catholicism for their own culture war reasons.
Steve,
ReplyDeleteI have written about so-called biblically illiterate 'evangelicals' who support Trump.