I see that Jason has retweeted a James Morrow tweet having a go at those mocking the PM for the shots of his Pentecostal style Easter worship because they would never have a go at Muslim's prostate form of worship in the same way.
OK, let's agree that there is often a Lefty double standard in terms of all Australian Muslims getting a "hey, we respect all of your faith beliefs, save for the extremists who want to blow up people, of course; but we understand they are not true Muslims" versus a conservative Christian getting a "you and your Church's condemnation of gay marriage and attitudes to women absolutely appals us and is so medieval and disrespectful." I get that.
BUT: the simpler issue here that I would bet is behind a lot of Twitter criticism of Morrison is Australians' dislike of the ostentatious use of religious worship by any politician.
James Morrow ("Prick with a Fork" - he's like those Catallaxy commenters who think they are being amusingly self depreciating in name choice, without realising that most readers just find it accurate) is from America, I think, where ostentatious worship is still a political thing. (Curious as to how long it will last, though, given the dramatically reducing faith of the American public as a whole.)
But the Australian standard is to roll our eyes at seeing a politician even just walking into or out of Church when it electorally suits them. We know most politicians are not regular Church goers and it's only for show, particularly during election campaigns (like Bill Shorten yesterday). But even for those who do regularly attend (which I think includes the PM?), it's still cringeworthy to see them trying to get self serving publicity by being happy to have the media there as they enter or leave. Remember Rudd's regular use of that? It was pretty sickening, especially once the full extend of what a jerk of a boss he could be came to light.
Taking it a step further and getting the cameras inside to watch the PM participation is at another level of cringeworthy.
A dignified politician at most lets cameras show them going in or out, and does not want private worship turning up on the news.
The only good thing about it is that Morrison, who deserves to lose big time, might not realise that it probably hurts more than it helps in public perception? I think his PR smarts are very lacking.
Update: typically, Sinclair Davidson can't understand why many Australians have a problem with Morrison allowing photos of him inside his church to be used during an election campaign.
But he has all the political judgement of a libertarian - which is close to nil.
Hey Sinclair, can you do me a favour and start pressing for more publicity about how many Liberal Party members like the idea of privatising (or "giving away") the ABC? There's a good chap.
The name came from his food review blog. It was a joke so common that another food reviewer - was it Dubecki? - recently released a book of reviews with that title.
ReplyDeleteI seem to recall James had a previous blog where he just used his name?!?
Except for the ABC lapping up Rudd when he went to church and then did a doorstop outside the church. Nobody got worked up about it. Another lefty double standard.
ReplyDeleteAnon: I don't think the cringe quotient of Rudd doing door stops outside of church went uncommented on by those on the Left at the time.
ReplyDeleteTim: yes, I know he's used the name for a long time, and it's witty enough in the context of a restaurant reviewer. But it's ironic that, as he gone political (even appearing as guest host on Outsiders, an outlet for Right wing mouth breathers)it's somewhat ironic that his chosen name is (as I said) like those at Catallaxy.
Sometimes one makes these compromises because they couldn't be bothered, or because some of their audiences from previous media carry across.
ReplyDeleteJM very kindly furnished a flippant comment for the back of my poetry book which I trusty you have already bought. :)