That commentary piece that has appeared in Nature on the great uncertainties in the amount of greenhouse gas likely to come from melting permafrost is indeed a worry. The basic message is that things are going faster in the North than anyone expected:
Current models of greenhouse-gas release and climate assume that
permafrost thaws gradually from the surface downwards. Deeper layers of
organic matter are exposed over decades or even centuries, and some
models are beginning to track these slow changes.
But models are
ignoring an even more troubling problem. Frozen soil doesn’t just lock
up carbon — it physically holds the landscape together. Across the
Arctic and Boreal regions, permafrost is collapsing suddenly as pockets
of ice within it melt. Instead of a few centimetres of soil thawing each
year, several metres of soil can become destabilized within days or
weeks. The land can sink and be inundated by swelling lakes and
wetlands.
Abrupt thawing of permafrost is dramatic to watch. Returning to field
sites in Alaska, for example, we often find that lands that were
forested a year ago are now covered with lakes2. Rivers that once ran clear are thick with sediment. Hillsides can liquefy, sometimes taking sensitive scientific equipment with them.
This
type of thawing is a serious problem for communities living around the
Arctic (see ‘Arctic permafrost’). Roads buckle, houses become unstable.
Access to traditional foods is changing, because it is becoming
dangerous to travel across the land to hunt. Families cannot reach lines
of game traps that have supported them for generations.
In short, permafrost is thawing much more quickly than models have
predicted, with unknown consequences for greenhouse-gas release.
Researchers urgently need to learn more about it. Here we outline how.
There current guesstimate as to how much worse it could be than that in current models:
We estimate that abrupt permafrost thawing in lowland lakes and
wetlands, together with that in upland hills, could release between 60
billion and 100 billion tonnes of carbon by 2300. This is in addition to
the 200 billion tonnes of carbon expected to be released in other
regions that will thaw gradually. Although abrupt permafrost thawing
will occur in less than 20% of frozen land, it increases permafrost
carbon release projections by about 50%. Gradual thawing affects the
surface of frozen ground and slowly penetrates downwards. Sudden
collapse releases more carbon per square metre because it disrupts
stockpiles deep in frozen layers.
Furthermore, because abrupt
thawing releases more methane than gradual thawing does, the climate
impacts of the two processes will be similar7. So, together, the impacts of thawing permafrost on Earth’s climate could be twice that expected from current models.
Holy fuck. For starters methanes effects are almost everywhere pre-empted by the range of the spectrum that water vapour takes out. Secondly methane is lighter than air. Which means as soon as it gets above your house and your head its not going to have any warming effect where you are. For the planet to overheat the extra joules have to be plunged deep in the earth or the ocean. Just in the same way as putting the heater in the attic won't do as much as if its in the central basement.
ReplyDeleteThere is absolutely no chance of methane warming the planet whatsoever. And if it gets above water vapour level it will COOL the planet by blocking incoming. Think of where the joules have to be released to heat you? Or to accumulate in the planet? They cannot be up high. Now get a grip will you.