Friday, March 06, 2020

Now they praise her..

I'm seeing a lot of pro-Warren comments on Twitter now that she is out of the race.  Thanks fellas, for coming out now.

I think I am probably also being persuaded by the moderate Democrats arguments that Sanders is just not as electable as Biden, because he is simply not carrying the more moderate states, and the ones that flip between red and blue, in the middle of the country.   Sanders even acknowledges that he is not increasing the youth turnout as he had hoped, which is what he needs to kick out the old white people from middle America (who are killing us - as I like to say.) 

I am also persuaded by the suggestion that, given the age of the two front runners and doubts their health, they should chose a VP runner now.

I had previously said Sanders/Warren may well work, but now I am leaning towards Biden/Warren (and, as someone on Twitter suggested, Biden also undertaking to only stay in for one term.)   I think that could keep both sides of the party happy enough (except for the more ratbag Sanders bros, but really, numerically they can probably be ignored.)

Oh, and I should note again how Tulsi Gabbard is a ridiculous, non serious show pony who is using her campaign to get a job on Fox News, as this article argues.

 

36 comments:

  1. Anonymous9:59 am

    Promising to stay only one term is a mistake:
    1. he is conceding that his age is a problem
    2. he is undermining any argument for political continuity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Projection. Thats exactly what you did. You waited until Warren was history, and then you started praising her to detract from any anti-Oligarchy candidate. That was your zionist scam. The only anti-oligarchy candidates left are Tulsi and Bernie so your pro-Oligarchy behaviour has been 100% consistent through-out.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pay very close attention to what Steve is up to people. He's been pro-zionist and pro-Oligarchy the entire time. Going way back. Even as rog at Catallaxy. But he tries to hide it in a number of ways.

    He's leading to Biden-Warren. Why? Because Biden has clinical dementia and is an oligarchy candidate. So that means the whole thing will be controlled by his crowd.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As to the first comment above: a hell of a lot of what any President can achieve is dependent on the make up of Congress. If Biden were to run on a "voters, give Democrats the ability, through both branches of government, to right the ship of government back to normalcy, we can achieve that easily in a 4 year term and the Presidency can be passed onto the next safe Democrat hands".

    ReplyDelete
  5. Graeme: you're a nut.

    Next...

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Imagine supporting someone who is without any doubt unwell mentally, in the full medical sense. You are a fucking lunatic.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  9. nothing Tulsi has said is wrong. The US are backing Islamist terrorists over a religiously tolerant regime (whatever its other faults). Assad is preferable to anyone else,

    she is staying in the race because of her principles, why didn't the corporate media ask the same thing of Warren?

    ReplyDelete
  10. and yes I have concluded long ago Biden is not mentally fit. the gaffes are accumulating day by day.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  16. So, Jason, her playing footsies with Hindu nationalists and Modi doesn't concern you at all?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Graeme, I'm just deleting all your Jew ranting rubbish, just so you know...

    ReplyDelete
  18. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Gabbard starting "look at me" legal actions with no prospects of success is not a good look either.

    https://www.newsweek.com/judge-throws-out-tulsi-gabbards-lawsuit-alleging-google-violated-her-free-speech-rights-1490602

    ReplyDelete
  20. Jason, I reckon you have a really bad nose for detecting characters who show boat for attention rather than being genuinely good faith actors. That Andy Ngo, for example, smelt of cynical self promotion over genuine objective reporting from when I first noticed him.

    And with Gabbard, you can't seem to smell anything dubious about her going on Fox News to rubbish Hillary Clinton while still running as a Democrat for President.

    ReplyDelete
  21. No of course there is nothing suspect about going on Fox news to defend herself against Hillary Clinton's lies. What is wrong with that?

    ReplyDelete
  22. "So, Jason, her playing footsies with Hindu nationalists and Modi doesn't concern you at all?"

    Does this refer to talking to the leader of the largest democracy in the world today? You have to be able to talk to other leaders. Shoring up India, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea is a vital goal of authentic American policy so that we can wait for the Chinese demographic collapse and all be friends again. It isn't that complicated.

    ReplyDelete
  23. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  24. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  25. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Check out Steve who has been boloxing about Russia for three years, and yet he wants to give google and other inbred infiltrators a free pass. Any real election rigging he's all for. But fantasy Russian rigging ... So vigilante.

    ReplyDelete
  27. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  28. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  29. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Notice that every status quo supporter basically bailed on the orders of the DNC and endorsed the fellow with dementia. Just completely toadied. Warren delayed a tiny bit. But Tulsi didn't follow any orders. She didn't budge.

    Now this is supposed to be a bad thing. Since she didn't follow orders in order to support A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WITH DEMENTIA.

    Showboating according to one idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  31. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  32. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  33. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  34. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  35. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  36. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete