....Graeme is going on and on about how upset he is that I am have stopped letting his pro-HCQ and other "how to avoid COVID-19" nostrums through anymore.
Graeme, it's a great pity your anti-Semitism conspiracy theories prevent you participating at Catallaxy, as your wildly disproportionate certainty in your own expertise and conclusions means you are a natural "fit" for all of the armchair experts-in-everything that inhabit that awful place.
You've had more than a fair run in comments here about your solutions to COVID-19, and it's become boring and repetitious. Even though all sensible people reading this blog should know I don't endorse your views on nearly anything, I'm calling a halt to your publication of dubious amateur hour medical advice via my comments.
12 comments:
oh come on steve I'm interested to learn more about how Graeme acquired his patient
I think she's in The Philippines, or something. His wife was from somewhere SE Asia, wasn't she?
If he wants to clarify, without going berzerk about me being a Jew who wants people to die, I'll let his comment through.
"I'm calling a halt to your publication of dubious amateur hour medical advice via my comments."
Yeah I get it. The terrorists win we lose. So we are going to have to be muzzled, made to look like storm troopers, get a new vaccine every fortnight until we are sterilised zombies .... and all because leftists cannot get on Ebay and order the hard core stuff that is needed to block all six stages of viral action.
Graeme are you cutting another man's grass??
I've advised three ladies so far. Always pro bono. It my revenge on the medical system for killing both my parents. The first lady is from Tasmania and she was suffering from a range of complications stemming back to the use of proton pump inhibitors like Nexium. Go down that path and you will be dead within 15 years. She was the best patient you could have. She had a bit of money so she ordered the earthing sheets right away and walking barefoot on the wet sand at the beach that very day. Perfect patient and got healthy right away.
The second lady had a tumour in one of her breasts and was ready to have her breast mutilated. So we stopped that primitive barbarism. She still hasn't fixed up the root cause (electrical factors stemming from metal on two of her teeth.) But now the tumour is tiny and not a problem. She knows more about the subject than me now. One breakthrough was pulling out peanut butter from her diet because she hadn't realised that peanut butter contained glutamine.
The third lady I got talking too because I was bored during lockdown. But then her daughter got a sore throat and we had to figure out how to cure Covid as a precaution. The kid was alright but the Mother got very sick so she had to get HCQ. Then we had to deal with clotting, HCQ side effects. She can only handle half doses. Then the HCQ stopped working and we deduced an opportunistic bacterial lung infection so we fixed that up. So she's not going to die but she still is not really right. She probably won't be fully good for months and months. So I have no delusions about this being a beat up.
Only the first of these three had any money to work with. So we had to be creative and do everything cheaply with the other two. There is always an answer but seldom does it come from MD quackery.
No nothing like that Jason. I'll never meet any of these people.
Not meeting them in person presumably helps avoid the aggrieved relatives coming to your place with pitchforks, I guess. Or do you make them promise to not tell anyone that they're getting medical advice for their deadly illnesses from some rando they bumped into on the 'net?
What's next? Freelance, pro bono psychiatric services?
Why would that happen? The doctor sees many people 15 minutes at a hit. They give prescriptions dictatorially and cannot respond to feedback. Thats not rational healing. When you decide you want someone to live thats a three times a day feedback situation.
So for example with lady two we first started with apricot seeds. Some people can gobble them down at 200 at a time and they push benzine and cyanide into the cancer cell. But what if that cyanide leaks out somehow? Decades of safe use of laetrile meant that we should have been safe with it. But what do you know? For some reason the girl was sensitive to it so we had to go with a completely different strategy. So it takes constant monitoring.
Likewise when we were surprised to find out that the lady was sensitive to HCQ. Seventy years of experience and no real trouble but she turns out to be sensitive. A doctor would not have picked that up. So I'm much safer than a doctor. Doctors kill people all the time.
Ah, laetrile. Takes me back to the medical wisdom of Joh Bjelke-Petersen in the 1970's.
It's one thing for alternative medicine kooks to take their own lives into their hands, Graeme, but you really shouldn't be encouraging people to trust your "I learned it from the 'net" prescriptions of dangerous supplements and drugs.
Well you have to solve the underlying cause right? So laetrile cannot do that for you. On the other hand killing cancer cells is important if you have cancer right Steve? If I'm not going too fast for you? Am I being controversial here? And I going too fast for you?
So if you have runaway cancer cell replication, then you want to kill cancer cells. Since what starts off as a reasonable response to a root cause, tends to get a life of its own. It starts to build on itself. Though cancer does have root causes in all cases its an emergent phenomenon that cancer replication can get a momentum of its own that goes beyond the initial causal factor. So a small tumour is actually in some contexts an adaptation. But runaway cancer replication is a sign that your cancer cells are now acting like a foreign invader.
Its pretty hard to deny that killing cancer cells is never important in the treatment of cancer? Is that your argument? It can be just buying time or kicking the can down the road. But sometimes time is a real consideration.
The anti-Laetrile campaign can be traced back to a specific family and a specific time period. Why do you feel compelled to believe the Rockefellers? Name a Rockefeller family member that you find particularly convincing as a medical theorist?
Its a matter of history that there has been whistleblowers revealing that the CDC knew laetrile was helpful and that the CDC lied about it. This can be checked readily. But you know. If you are so desperate to stay in your murderous fantasy world what can I do about it.?
So yes if you tolerate laetrile, as almost everyone does, you are kind of halfway there with cancer and can take your time systematically improving your health and eliminating the root causes. We didn't have that luxury because as little as 3 apricot seeds gave the girl a headache. Risk-taking is out of the question in my view. Nausea is out of the question. But some treatments do get you running to the toilet and that is okay.
So we had to rethink the whole strategy. In this case the girl was really intelligent. So once I got her through the first month or two she took over and found out more about treating herself than I ever knew.
So dimwitted. The Steve approach to medical research: If Joh says so it cannot be right. If a black lady says so it must be wrong. If Trump does it you do the opposite.
Not much into using the brain hey fella?
Post a Comment