Hey, I wasn't wrong: the Guardian notes that box office for the latest Mission Impossible movie was underwhelming, despite heaps of critical praise. (A bit too much praise, in my opinion.)
As the article notes, one obvious thing they can do for the next (final) movie would be this:
...as much as that video of Tom Cruise jumping off a motorbike on a mountain cheered us all up in the depths of Covid, there might also be a lesson to learn here. Why on earth would any film choose to lead with repeated shots of the film’s biggest stunt being executed? By the time the actual film came out, everyone assumed that they’d already seen the best bit for free on YouTube. Next time, Mission: Impossible should try saving some excitement for the actual film.
Yes, we were all so familiar with the stunt by the time we were watching it in the cinema, it felt anti-climatic. (We also knew, from the "making of" nature of the publicity, that there was CGI involved in the version on the screen - to hide the fact that he was riding up a ramp.)
The final one should be shorter, punchier, and (ideally, but I know it won't happen) not be directed by McQuarrie.
The tragedy of the Mission Impossible series is that Tom Cruise is a good actor doing too many action films. He should have moved on.
ReplyDeleteIf you're looking for something different try Broker. Flawed in some respects but a very nice movie about the complexities of human motivation.
https://www.sbs.com.au/ondemand/movie/broker/2263734339902