Poor furry animals

The BBC reports:

Almost 100,000 mink at a farm in north-eastern Spain are to be culled after many of them tested positive for coronavirus, health authorities say.

The outbreak in Aragon province was discovered after a farm employee's wife contracted the virus in May.

Her husband and six other farm workers have since tested positive for the disease.

The mink, bred for their prized fur, were isolated and monitored closely after the workers became infected.

But when tests on 13 July showed that 87% of the mink were infected, health authorities ordered for all 92,700 of the semi-aquatic animals to be culled.

Poetry is bad

It's a generalisation, I know, but based on the evidence of a poem read out on Radio National breakfast this morning (apparently, this is a regular thing after 8.30am on Fridays now?) all reading of poetry on any form of broadcasting needs to be banned forever.

If people like it, they can do it in semi clandestine fashion in the back rooms of some pub or other.  God knows it would take a lot of alcohol to make me enjoy it.

Update:  given my daughter has complained about doing poetry in English, and I have expressed my condolences as she apparently inherited my dislike of the art form, I am curious - what percent of the population does actually say they like (some) poetry?    I know as an art form it has some following, but how large is it?    I mean, honestly, if there was a Cultural Revolution style government that could ban its creation, publication and recitation, would there be like 90% of the population (95% amongst high school students) who would shrug their shoulders and say "seems a bit harsh, but affects me not one little bit, actually"?

I know there is a risk that if I go on about this it seems like I'm painting myself as an insensitive and intolerant bogan*, but the poem I heard this morning has sent me over the edge.


* also, as it happens, I know that 3 of my tiny pool of regular readers are, at the very least, poetry defenders and 2 write it!

Setting standards Nero would have been impressed with

Honest to God, we're going to have to wait another 2,000 years before we see a stupider, more offensively facile Presidency:

It's attracting a lot of comments.  Some are great:

Douthat on "cancel culture"

I think that the best column I have read on the (always verging on the tedious) topic of "cancel culture" is by Ross Douthat.  It's worth clearing your browser cache to read it.

I tend to get annoyed with both extremes on the topic - those on the Left who are disinclined to admit there are shouty, illiberal, snowflakey liberals who would like to see those who don't toe their (usually identity politics driven) takes "punished" in one form or another; and those on the Right who think this is completely new and novel and ignore conservative examples of seeking to punish liberals, as well as the fatuous self serving line that all offence taking is stupid and only exists because people choose to be offended.

It's pretty clear, I think, that Douthat is similarly somewhere in the middle on this.

A big, mushroom shaped, anniversary

Axios reminds us that today is the 75th anniversary of the explosion of the first atomic bomb (not Hiroshima, but the Trinity test).

First of all - as I've said before, the older you get, the more you properly sense the incredibly rapid pace of change of human knowledge and abilities; and when you compare the timing of historical events to your own age, it starts to feel not very long ago at all.  

Secondly, maybe I have read this before, but it hadn't stuck in my memory:  the bomb turned out to be about 4 times more powerful than they had expected -

At 5:29 a.m. on July 16, 1945, the first nuclear bomb was tested at Trinity Site, in a New Mexico desert valley called Jornada del Muerto, or Journey of the Dead.

• It was successful — far more successful than expected. Before the test, the scientists at the Manhattan Project had estimated the bomb — a 194-ton metal ball they referred to as "the Gadget" — would yield the explosive equivalent of between 700 and 5,000 tons of TNT. And that assumed it would work at all.

• In fact, after the blinding flash of light and that first awful mushroom cloud, observers discovered that Trinity's detonation force was equivalent to 20,000 tons of TNT, at a time when the most powerful conventional bomb in the U.S. arsenal was equivalent to 10 tons of TNT.

A prediction

This book by Tim, published by Right wing vanity press outlet Connor Court, will be the most vapid book of political thought since Pauline Hanson's autobiography:

Update:  here's the description of the book from the publisher's website:

Tim Wilson argues that it is time for liberals to offer Australia a new social contract that places the interests of the individual at the core of the Government’s policy agenda. Central to achieving this will be reforms that depart from the neoliberal era of equity extraction, and instead concentrate on decentralising power and increasing homeownership, in order to address the needs of Australia’s changing demography.

 Yep. Getting the feeling this is hardly going to be ground breaking.

A rubbery question

As one thought leads to another, and I've been reading about rubber lately, I've been wondering this:   why did Goodyear, who invented vulcanisation (and hence the modern era of rubber), even think to put sulphur into rubber?  Why sulphur?  Seems an odd substance to try mixing with indian rubber in the vague hope something good may come of it.

Of course the mega resource of the internet would help.

Turns out the sulphur idea was actually that of another inventor, Nathaniel Hayward, and his account of his involvement in the path towards vulcanisation seems to be set out in a statement at this obscure website:

Sometimes previous to the year 1834 there was a company formed at Boxbury, Mass., to manufacture India Rubber goods. The members of this company were John Haskins, Edwin M. Chaffee, and Luke Baldwin. They had in some way learned the art of dissolving rubber gum, which they tried to keep a profound secret. They soon, however, sold out their interest to a larger company called the Roxbury India Rubber Company, who continued the business in the same place. This company made large preparations to manufacture India rubber goods, and the interest got up with regard to this article in and around the city of Boston was very great. India rubber cloth for carriage tops, overcoats, and other articles to protect such as were obliged to be out in stormy weather, and it was thought would soon come into general use and create a great demand for this fabric.

In the year 1834 Gen. Jackson, then President of the United States, visited New England, and while at Boston was presented with a suit of clothes of this new manufacture, in which dress, on a day somewhat wet, he appeared in public on horseback, for the purpose of reviewing the troops on the Boston Common. This occurrence helped to inflate the bubble, and in a short time the stock of this company rose from one hundred to five or six hundred dollars a share, and every one owning stock in this concern, it was thought, was about to make his fortune.

My curiosity, with that of many others, was highly excited, and I went to the factory and bought rubber cloth for a carriage top. When using the carriage thus covered, I noticed that when two surfaces of this cloth came together, in a warm day, they adhered, in consequence of the softening of the gum. This struck me as quite an objection to the use of the article, and led me to try experiments to obviate it. For this purpose, in the month of August, 1834, among other experiments, I mixed and melted together rubber gum, sulphur, and lampblack; but this mixture, at that time, did not result in anything valuable. I continued, however, as I had leisure, experimenting with this article from August, 1834 till April 1835, showing from time to time small samples of my results to sundry persons engaged in the rubber business, for the purpose of carrying on which many companies were being formed in and around the city of Boston, where I then lived. I was assured, by persons to whom I showed my samples, if I could hit upon any method of preventing rubber cloth from becoming soft and sticky when it was exposed to the sun or otherwise warmed, I might depend on being well rewarded. These assurances from men in whom I had confidence, encouraged me to continue my efforts. I therefore sold out my livery establishment in Boston, that I might be able to devote all my time and attention to the business of experimenting with India rubber.

Still doesn't explain why he thought of adding sulphur at that time!  However, the determination he showed to continue experimenting is pretty admirable:

After closing up my affairs, and paying my debts, I had remaining about five hundred dollars, and a horse and buggy. With this property 1 went out to Easton, my native town, and hired a mill building of Cyrus Lathrop, called the Quaker Leonard Place, at a rent of one hundred and fifty dollars a year. This mill was situated in a retired spot about half a mile from the main road, and not far from Oliver Ames' shovel factory. Here, remote from observation, I shut myself up and entered upon a course of experiments with rubber, and continued it for two months without any satisfactory result.

At the end of this time I was on the point of giving up the whole concern, in utter despair; but finally concluded, before doing this, to make one more trial. For this purpose I put all my chemicals, with which I had been working, into a still of the capacity of fourteen or fifteen gallons, with spirits of turpentine, and drew off about four gallons, into which I put four pounds of rubber gum to be dissolved, and with this solution, I made twelve yards (three-fourths wide) rubber cloth, which looked finely, and which stood the weather perfectly, without melting when exposed to the sun for months. The chemicals I put into the still were white vitriol, blue vitriol, sugar of lead, sulphur and several others, indeed, all I had. This result gave me much encouragement, and I took my rubber cloth and went to Boston, thinking that now I had found out how to make rubber goods that would stand the test. I showed my cloth to a company recently formed called the Eagle India Rubber Company, and they at once offered to give me employment. But I declined entering into their service till I had ascertained, by further trial, that I could make more cloth like the piece I had been exhibiting. I therefore bought a  new supply of chemicals and returned to Easton to repeat the experiment which had proved so successful. To my great disappointment, after numerous trials, variously repeated, and continued for nearly four months, I utterly failed to make anything like the sample I showed to the company in Boston. I then went to work to examine my chemicals separately, with the view of ascertaining their purity. I found impurities in many of them, especially spirits of turpentine and lampblack. The turpentine I found I could purify by thoroughly agitating it with water, and the lampblack by exposure to heat, and thus clearing it of all oily matters with which it is usually connected. The spirits of turpentine thus purified, I found would dissolve the rubber, and purified lampblack being added, and the solution applied to cloth, produced an article which would stand the weather. Upon the strength of this discovery, I engaged to work for this company, on a salary of $1,000 a year.

Finally, we get to him working out that it was the sulphur that was important:

Soon after they began work at Woburn, they expressed the wish that I would make some white aprons, thinking they would sell well. This I attempted to do by using a compound of white lead, magnesia and whiting, with equal parts of virgin or white rubber, dissolved in spirits of turpentine. The aprons looked pretty well, but when warmed would soften and stick, and not being white enough to suit irie, I exposed them to the fumes of sulphur to make them whiter, taking the hint from having seen straw bonnets bleached in this manner. By this treatment the rubber cloth became very white, and made elegant aprons. But in addition to superior whiteness, I noticed that these aprons did not soften and adhere after being exposed to the fumes of sulphur as they had done before such exposure. This gave me the first intimation of the power of sulphur to prevent rubber from becoming soft and adherent when warmed. After this I tried exposing pieces of cloth to the sun that had been fumigated with sulphur, and others of the same kind which had not been thus treated, and found the former' would stand firm while the latter would melt and become sticky.

From this time I tried a great variety of experiments with these articles, in numerous and various combinations, and I found that only when sulphur was one of the ingredients of the mixture, there was no melting or sticking of the rubber cloth. All the time I was working for the Eagle Company, and afterwards while working for myself, I, as I had leisure, was experimenting with sulphur and rubber—and the results, and the way and manner they were brought about I kept entirely to myself. One of these discoveries was that rubber cloth which had been prepared without the use of sulphur, if sprinkled over with sulphur in powder and exposed to the sun, and afterwards washed clean, that this process would fix the gum and prevent it from melting.

After I discovered that it was sulphur, and nothing else, among the articles with which I had been experimenting in combination with rubber, which prevented it from melting and becoming adhesive when warmed, it occurred to me, that this was what made the piece of cloth shown to. the Eagle Company free from the usual objections to this article as then made. But during the four months I was laboring in vain to make a perfect piece of rubber cloth, it never entered my mind that sulphur was of any account in this business, and I did not use it.

The story goes on to explain that Charles Goodyear started sniffing around this factory, and Hayward finally told him that it was sulphur that was the secret to his non sticking rubber products.

And then, apparently, Goodyear accidentally discovered that heating it worked wonders:

He developed a nitric acid treatment and in 1837 contracted for the manufacture by this process of mailbags for the U.S. government, but the rubber fabric proved useless at high temperatures.


For the next few years he worked with Nathaniel M. Hayward (1808–65), a former employee of a rubber factory in Roxbury, Mass., who had discovered that rubber treated with sulfur was not sticky. Goodyear bought Hayward’s process. In 1839 he accidentally dropped some India rubber mixed with sulfur on a hot stove and so discovered vulcanization. 

This discovery, and patenting it, did not lead to an easy ride for Goodyear, though:

Goodyear went on to perfect the modern process of curing rubber-acid mixture with heat, now known as vulcanisation. He received a patent for his process on June 15, 1844. Good years, however, weren’t ahead.

Patent wars, pirates employing his patented process without authorisation, increasing debts (for instance, money borrowed for extravagant displays in London and Paris) and a host of other factors meant that Goodyear never enjoyed the success of the rubber industry. His process would go on to make millions for others, but when he died in 1860, he was still in debt.

Anyway, after all of that:  was sulphur first being added to rubber just a case of Hayward throwing anything into the problem and seeing what (wouldn't!) stick?   Seems so...

Update:  I was just reading a bit about the history of sulphur more generally, and have found the next historical thing I must look up:

The element itself was not isolated until 1809, according to the Royal Society of Chemistry, when French chemists Louis-Josef Gay-Lussac and Louis-Jacques Thénard created a pure sample. (Gay-Lussac was known for his research on gases, which involved him flying in hydrogen-filled balloons more than 22,900 feet (7,000 meters) above sea level, according to the Chemical Heritage Foundation.)

 Gay-Lussac sounds well worth reading about!

Most satisfying household chore

I'm been meaning to say this out loud for some time:  I reckon clothes washing and outdoor drying of same is the most satisfying household chore.

Many years ago, a flatmate made a confession that she said she knew she should keep to herself -  she actually enjoyed cleaning the bathroom.  The restoration of cleanliness and whiteness in sinks and toilets did it for her.

I understand the sentiment, but I think I find that job too chemical intensive and therefore artificial to be completely pleasing.  (Not only that, but if you live in an older house where the shower screen glass has become impossible to restore to perfect see through transparency - it's the micro erosion of the surface, apparently, not soap scum or scale - you don't get the feeling that you've restored the whole room to "as new" condition.)

But for some time now, I find myself always thinking about how unusually satisfying I find hanging out washing to dry, and how putting on a load of washing is so simple, especially compared to my childhood, when my mother had to wrestle washing through this type of machine:

The whole washing and drying process now combines something like the best of technological convenience (the front load washer that has come from some far away land - possibly Germany?) with the ancient practice going back to the invention of clothes of hanging them out to dry in the sun and/or breeze.   When you think about it, the clothes drying part is actually nuclear powered, but at a very safe distance.   :)

I posted many years ago about the weird American aversion to using outdoor clotheslines.   I see that the struggle for them to get sensible about this continues.  Here's a recently updated post at Treehugger:

The New York Times Green Inc. blog ran an insightful post on an increasingly love it or hate it practice earlier today: using outdoor clotheslines in lieu of or in addition to conventional energy guzzling drying machines.

I’ll be the first to admit that I’ve never used an outdoor clothesline. In fact, aside from movies and television and a trip to Spain several years ago I rarely see clotheslines being used. I, like much of young urban North America, consider clotheslines to be domestic relics; household staples that have either been banished to the "countryside" or disappeared decades ago along with egg timers, rotary phones, and washing buckets.

According to Project Laundry List, an advocacy group that’s pushing to give all citizens the legal right to hang dry their dirty knickers while raising awareness about alternatives to nuclear power, state-backed initiatives to lift bans on the use of clotheslines are increasingly common.

Clothesline bans, usually enacted by homeowner and condo associations, operate under the guise that they these simple energy-savers are unsightly blemishes on urban and suburban landscapes. States including Florida, Colorado, Utah, and most recently, Maine, have right-to-dry laws intact while other states such as Maine and Hawaii have similar bills in the works.

Imagine never knowing the nice feeling of bringing in naturally dried clothes?  They don't know what they're missing out on.

 

No translation needed

Now going with "elder statesman" hair

So, Trump has given a widely panned campaign speech from the White House (apparently supposed to be about China, but more complaining about Biden.)

Lots of people have commented on his hair being transformed into grey:

I reckon we'll have a leak from the White House soon enough - some media adviser (or Ivanka) has told Trump "maybe it's the grey haired 'elder statesman' look that explains Biden's poll numbers.  Let's give it a try."

Singapore, democracy, and housing

Keeping on today's Asian theme, I noticed the Singaporean election result last week gave the PAP (should be PGP - Permanent Governing Party) a lower than usual 61.2% of the vote.  Now that sounds more like a democracy - although I see that it still meant it got 83 out of 93 seats.   And I see that it has had similar vote just above 60% a couple of times before.   Hmm.  Is this another stupid first past the post system?  Yes, yes it is.  (The link points to other aspects of the Singaporean system that work in favour of the PAP.) 

Anyway, as I have said before, if you watch CNA a lot, you can't help but be impressed by the apparent technocratic and social reasonableness of the current bunch of governing PAP politicians.   I'd be inclined to give up on a more representative form of democracy too if I felt it meant government in the hands of such competent sounding people.   Instead, we get stuck with Smarmo (with the occasional fart smell of Mini Trump), who unfortunately is getting better approval ratings than he deserves due to his at least appearing to be on a more-or-less reasonable track regarding COVID-19.  

Put me down as someone who is never likely to give him an overall tick of approval - Labor would not have handled COVID-19 substantially differently, and we might at least have something vaguely resembling Ministerial accountability under them. 

But - back to Singapore.  I was reading this history of their public housing success, and learnt a few things:

While the government’s action helped solve the housing crisis, it was the decision to begin offering subsidized flats for sale in 1964 that laid the foundation for Singapore’s real-estate success. Under its “Home Ownership for the People Scheme” around 2,000 two- and three-bedroom apartments were sold to lower-middle-income citizens in a new estate in the district of Queenstown for as little as S$4,900 each. Like most HDB sales, they were offered on a 99-year lease and buyers were forbidden from reselling the property for at least five years.

Once that period finished, owners of flats in prestigious complexes stood to make a sizeable profit. Even in those venerable blocks in Queenstown, an unmodernized two-bedroom unit can now sell for around S$220,000, with only 43 years left on the lease. In 2016, the total resale value of Singapore’s HDB apartments was estimated to be more than S$400 billion.

The blocks were built in neighborhood clusters – miniature new towns with playgrounds, food centers and local shops. The larger ones, like Queenstown, had a health clinic, a community center and a library. And like most things in Singapore’s meticulously planned economy, the management of the estates was integrated into policies that included everything from the design of the city’s mass transit system to racial integration.

In a policy that began in 1989, HDB blocks require minimum levels of occupancy of each of the main ethnic groups in the city — Chinese, Malay and Indian — to prevent the formation of “racial enclaves.” The government continues to implement what one senior minister once called the “most intrusive social policy in Singapore” to encourage social harmony.

I find that kind of social engineering very appealing - when it works, anyway.

The government makes sure the blocks are well maintained:

While many governments have focused public housing programs on the poorest members of society—often allowing the austere concrete blocks to deteriorate into urban slums—Singapore recognized that these homes represented the biggest stake its citizens had in the prosperity of the country. The HDB not only maintained its buildings and grounds carefully, but periodically upgraded estates with new elevators, walkways and facelifts.

And how is this for a bit of "that's not how government is supposed to work!" PAP policy:

The potential financial gain from the value of the flats became so important to the nation’s citizens that it was used as a political tool, with the ruling People’s Action Party in the 1980s announcing that it would prioritize maintenance of estates in constituencies that elected a PAP member. The party has never lost a general election.

I don't think I had heard this before - but residents now get built in bomb shelters too!:

As the illustrated floor plan above shows, many have a store room, which, in all apartments built since 1996, has become a bomb shelter with reinforced concrete walls and a massive steel door to protect the occupants in case the Republic is attacked.

Gee. 

Anyway,  I can't wait to go back to Disneyland with the Death Penalty, but there is the matter of a certain coronavirus stuffing up my plans.  

What a year we're having...

I think it was obvious from years of watching Mythbusters that he must have been a likeable guy in real life, and because of that (as well as his age, the suddenness, and - more selfishly - the uncomfortable feeling this gives that an aneurysm time bomb could be in anyone's head) makes this more upsetting than the average celebrity death:

Super huff

That's a very huffy look from Trump while taking questions today:

Incidentally, you can see where he got this bit of "whataboutism" from - Fox News had an article about it a few days ago:

However, during the 2009 swine flu pandemic, the Obama administration suddenly told states to shut down their testing, without providing much in the way of explanation. And, Biden's top advisor at the time has acknowledged that the Obama administration didn't do "anything right" to combat that pandemic, before walking back those comments.

The record seemingly complicates Biden's claims, in advertising and speeches, that he would have handled state-level coronavirus testing more effectively than the current White House.

As David Roberts said recently, the Republicans and conservatives have virtually no arguments that don't come down to "whataboutism".    It's a style of argument that appeals particularly strongly to a chronic narcissist.  

Pollution in Indonesia

Seeing I am in the mood for South East Asian talk, I watched this recent document from Germany on a very polluted river in Indonesia:



Most of the chemical pollution is from the textile industry, which seems to have dozens of factories lining this river.

I missed a few minutes, but my son said that one factory guy's attitude was that as long as the waste water didn't make your hand feel itchy, it was OK to release into the river!  And then there was the rice contamination.  All very bad, and rather unclear how much the government might be doing to make and enforce standards.

So, there's another thing to feel guilty about:  apparently, Uniqlo (my preferred place to buy casual shirts) sources a lot of its material from these Indonesian factories.  (Also H&M, but its clothes seem designed for 20 year old stick insects, so I don't buy from them.)

Rubbery figures

Yesterday's story about Top Glove in Malaysia making lots of money from the heightened demand for medical rubber gloves made me realise that I didn't really know where most of the world's rubber now comes from.   The perfect question for the internet!

World Atlas has this table:

I wouldn't have guessed that China now produces more rubber than Malaysia. 

Actually, those figures are just for 2013, and I see that other sites say that the top three are Thailand, Indonesia, then Malaysia (and the amount produced by countries 3 to 6 in the table above are pretty close - so maybe 2013 was just a bad year for Malaysian rubber plantations for some reason?)

Anyway, not sure I knew this bit of rubber trivia:

Although the Hevea tree is native to South America, cultivation there is limited due to the high prevalence of leaf blight diseases and other natural predators.

 See - globalisation is good.

I might have guessed that the rubber glove industry doing well would mean that the price of natural rubber would be holding up.   But I guess it only uses a tiny amount in the big picture.  Hence The Association of Natural Rubber Producing Countries has this bit of not so great news:

The key factor behind the abnormal fall in the prices of natural rubber (NR) since mid-January is the huge drop in the world demand caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The world consumption of NR dropped by 15.7% during H1 2020 (Jan-Jun 2020) as per the revised estimates. In China, the country accounting 40% of the world demand, the consumption fell by 20.1% during H1 2020.

It is relieving to observe that the worst is almost over as far as the world consumption of NR is concerned. The world consumption is now set to enter positive territory by increasing 1.4%, year-on-year, during Q3 2020 (Jul-Sep).  The consumption in China, in particular, is expected to increase by 0.8%, year-on-year, during the same quarter. Although the International Monitory Fund a week ago has further scaled down the global economic outlook for 2020, to -4.9% growth from -3.0% projected in April, the consumption sector of NR has almost returned to normal with the exception of a few countries. 

Now that I am on a rubber bender, so to speak, reading up on the history of the product, I see that Brazil was the victim of, well, if not industrial espionage, certainly undercover dirty business (there are a lot of similar examples from other products, over the centuries):  

From 1850 to 1920, businessmen were pushing entrepreneurs and traders to increase the amount of rubber extracted from Amazonian trees. During this period, the Brazilian Amazon was the only source of rubber and they controlled the price, making rubber expensive. At the same time, as more and more industry was developing in Europe and USA, more uses for rubber were being found [4]. Rubber was such an important material for Brazilians that they prohibited the export of rubber seeds or seedlings. However, in 1876, H. A. Wickham managed to smuggle 70,000 rubber seeds, hidden in banana leaves, and brought them to England. From those seeds, only 1,900 seedlings survived and were sent to Malaysia to start the first rubber plantations in Asia. This marked the beginning of the end for Brazil as the world’s main rubber producer. 

Monday, kind of depressing, stuff

*  So even the most corrupt Attorney General we've seen in a lifetime thought Trump's commutation of Stone would be corrupt?   Mitt Romney's reaction makes me like him, and Mormons, all the more.  There is just no debating this as corruption of historic proportions. 

*  Saw a tweet indicating the thickness of Arctic ice at the moment is pointing to a very low figure for ice extent by September.   Really looks like it may break the 2012 record - which in a way is not a bad thing, in terms of focussing the public's attention on global warming:

*  Remember I posted recently how I had started watching some off beat travel vlogs on Youtube by middle aged English guy "Bald and Bankrupt"?   On the weekend, he posted a short video explaining that he had, foolishly by his own admission, travelled to Serbia after the start of COVID 19 and caught it there.   Became very ill, was hospitalised, got to watch other patients dying around him, still feels very weak, and remarked how it seems to have even affected the, um, normal operation of his penis (!).   The guy is, I think, 45, so it's a cautionary tale of how ill it can make even the relatively young.   Oh - I see it seems he took down the video?  Or is it back up?  Dunno what's going on.  Also, it seems he has been popular for a long time - he seems very well known on Reddit.

*  If you want one, sort of, good thing that has come out of COVID-19:  if you had shares in the Malaysian company Top Glove, the biggest medical glove manufacturer in the world, you would be doing very well:



I'm sort of happy to see a Malaysian company doing well - at the political level, on the other hand, they're still jerks:

Six journalists including five Australians are being interrogated by Malaysian authorities who have accused them of sedition and defamation after the broadcast of a documentary about migrant workers in Kuala Lumpur during Covid-19.

Debating debates

So, Jazz Shaw at Hot Air thinks that it's Democrats who are fearful of Biden debating Trump:

It’s a highly uncomfortable subject for Democrats and their media allies, but it’s also a glaringly obvious truth. Nobody supporting Joe Biden wants to see him go into a debate with Donald Trump. Biden can barely manage reading a teleprompter in front of a camera in his own basement these days, even if he has multiple chances to get the words right. And his “aw, shucks” Uncle Joe routine probably won’t look very impressive when he has to answer a barbed attack. The fact is that Trump is just 100% Trump every minute he’s on camera. This has many liberals frightened of the prospect of a presidential debate between these two.

I think this is delusional.

As I have said before, in 2016 Trump got away with mouthing general motherhood statements about America and playing up to the Right's decades long vilification of Hillary Clinton.

He cannot take the same approach against Biden, a white male for whom polling is indicating Republican thrown mud is not sticking.  Trump has been showing increasing emotional fragility in his tweets, and there is a wealth of broken promises and lies made while in the job that can be listed against him.  Yes, he can and will say black is white, and his cult followers may believe him, but it will not likely work with those that he needs to swing back to him to win another election.

And, of course, people are exaggerating the significance of verbal stumbles make by Biden.

I had read that the Trump team had been asking for more debates, not fewer; and that this is normally a tactic taken by the underdog.   I think that this is just a sign of bravado on the part of team Trump, and that there will be people who are thinking the same way I am - that Trump's at risk of falling apart in debates against Biden, and they should be looking at a way of getting out of them.

Update:   someone wrote this in WAPO about Trump and debates on 26 June -

History also gives him reason to be wary. Sitting presidents — among them, Jimmy Carter in 1980, Ronald Reagan in 1984 and Barack Obama in 2012 — often stumble in their first debates because they arrived both overconfident and out of practice.

This year, the stakes for Trump could hardly be higher. His poll numbers are dropping, and there are signs that even Trump’s bluster-loving base is starting to have its doubts about him, now that it is seeing how he handles himself in a real crisis.

So as he looks ahead to the debates, the embattled president might want to focus on winning the old-fashioned way: by studying the issues, showing up prepared and commanding the facts.

That last paragraph is hilariously improbable.

A very obvious point

And surely their [White House press secretaries] salary is not high enough for this kind of credibility debasement?:

American failure

A good detailed piece in New York Magazine on the American failure to control COVID 19.

The only bit I am annoyed with is this:

With the exception, perhaps, of New Zealand, practically speaking, across the entire west, nobody has managed to properly and preemptively prepare for this pandemic.

I think Australia deserves some credit.

I more or less agree with this, though:

The first failure is one of hubris: Western nations looking on a disease outbreak in Asia and feeling protected by a sense of cultural superiority and wealth, and disregarding the emergency response in China and other nations as a reflection not of the seriousness of the disease but of an imagined, innate conformist authoritarianism. The second is a bit harder to name, but it does seem peculiarly American — a pattern of failure following failure, with each successive failure normalized by the last, which should have shaken us out of complacency.

Update:  more on the American problem.  Or should we just be calling it - the American problem caused by the American Right?: 

Ohio state Rep. Nino Vitale is urging his constituents not to get tested for the coronavirus, flouting advice from health officials — and from another Republican lawmaker, Gov. Mike DeWine.

"This is what happens when people go crazy and get tested," Vitale wrote on Facebook this week. "STOP GETTING TESTED!"

Vitale was evidently incensed by an order from DeWine and state health officials that people in seven Ohio counties with severe outbreaks must wear face coverings when out in public. That order took effect Wednesday.

Vitale shared an altered graphic about the order — in that version, there is an extra message at the bottom:

"!! NEVER GET TESTED !!"

About those Shellenberger claims

Michael Tobis, who has always been worth reading on climate change, has a detailed assessment at Real Climate of the highly dubious "facts few people know" by Shellenberger.  

Good stuff.