Monday, October 10, 2011
Sunday, October 09, 2011
Oceans heating, but how deep?
This Real Climate post, and the comments and discussion following, are important. The issue is heat going into the oceans, and whether once it gets there, it is possibly a problem again in the future.
There has been a skeptic argument around that if upper ocean heat is getting "buried" in the deep ocean (a fact which itself is very hard to measure, apparently) then the heat does not represent any future "threat" to surface temperatures again. Yet Trenberth had made a statement that any heat going down "has not disappeared and so it cannot be ignored. It must have consequences.”
Gavin Schmidt seems to indicate that, whatever Trenberth had in mind (and, curiously, he doesn't seem to know exactly what it was,) heating of the deep ocean has never been considered a threat to surface temperature.
Roger Pielke Snr turns up in the thread too, and Schmidt dismisses most of he claims about Ocean Heat Content. In particular, he says the ARGO system simply can't measure ocean heat moving from the top layer of the ocean to the deep ocean, whereas a skeptic meme (started by Pielke, I think) is that the "missing heat" can't be going into the deep ocean because ARGO hasn't seen it passing through the top 700 m.
This really does appear to be a very complicated topic, and it is surprising to see that this may be a case where climate scientists have contributed to a skeptic meme via their own looseness of language.
Domestic notes from the weekend
* The mother possum hasn't been seen for a few days now. In fact, her spot under the balcony on Friday morning seemed to be occupied by two smaller possums (as far as we could tell - we could only see one head but what appeared to be two rear ends.) What do possums do - play a game of musical nests each night, and just stay at the one nearest them when the sun comes up?
* Had a go at making limoncello this afternoon. It now has to sit in the cupboard for a month before being strained and ready to taste. I'm just hoping I sterilised the bottle enough - the last time I tried to do something with lemons (preserved lemons) they went mould pretty quickly in the jar. I hope the alcohol in limoncello helps prevent that. The recipe being followed is this one. I'm using vodka as the base, which is a form of alcohol which I could never see the point of drinking. I figure that even if one's intention is simply to get drunk, surely it's more interesting doing it with something with flavour. In any event, I was aware that fancy schmancy vodkas of all varieties were trendy for a while, particularly in the US, I think, given that I had seen a Mythbusters segment in which they were seeing if they could really tell the difference between high end brands. And indeed I was surprised to see today just how many brands are on the shelf in Australia too, most of which are only interesting for the nifty bottle designs. It's funny, but in two different bottle shops, the cheapest brands were actually made in France. When did they become a producer of cheap vodka? I also see now that many flavoured vodkas are sold, which is fair enough, I guess. Better than drinking plain old vodka.
* Speaking of lemons, it's spring and the lemon and lime tree are having their annual outbreak of stinkbugs. These bugs (the flat bodied bronze orange bug) appear to be extremely common on Australian citrus, and as this article notes, they do have a very vile smell when disturbed. They die pretty easily with any pyrethrum garden spray, but the big problem is reaching the one sitting up near the top of the lemon tree. (By the way, while Googling around on the topic, I came this page: Stink Bug Field Guide for Brisbane. We do seem to have many, many stinking bugs in this region - something to be proud of, I guess...)
* OK, this has nothing in particular to do with my weekend, apart from the fact that I just read it. The Taiwanese have an indigenous population? I didn't know that, although I suppose I shouldn't be surprised, because I had heard about the Ainu, being the Japanese equivalent. Funnily enough, if you watch the video at this link, you'll see a spokesman for the Ainu who looks a little bit like a younger version of Geoff Clark.
* I found out today that the McFeast is still on the menu at McDonald's as a "birthday special", but I remain concerned how much longer this will be the case.
* I guess I didn't mind the last Dr Who episode of this season, but as the final episode in this season's big story arc of how the Doctor avoids his (apparent) death at the start of the season, it did come up with a trick that seems just a little too "easy", if you ask me. Again, I see the Guardian (gosh they discuss this show a lot) has a long article about whether everyone is completely happy with the direction it has taken under Steven Moffat. It's good to see that I not alone in preferring the better stand alone stories to the overblown (and increasingly silly in their way) story arcs that Moffat seems most interested in.
Wednesday, October 05, 2011
Tuesday, October 04, 2011
Nasty utilitarians
Here's a short article about the apparent personality traits of the small-ish number of people who (in a thought experiment) think strongly enough of utilitarianism to kill someone innocent to save the lives of others.
Perhaps not surprisingly, they don't appear to be very nice:
They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas (push the fat guy off the bridge) and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.Always had my doubts about them!
Possible explanations
Wow, that was quick. The link above has quite a few papers from arXiv talking about how the faster than light neutrino experiment may be flawed, and/or possible explanations as to what is going on if the result is real.
Strange experiment
I'm not entirely sure why anyone would want to take a shot at magic mushrooms if you knew ahead of time about this:
A single high dose of the hallucinogen psilocybin, the active ingredient in so-called "magic mushrooms," was enough to bring about a measureable personality change lasting at least a year in nearly 60 percent of the 51 participants in a new study, according to the Johns Hopkins researchers who conducted it.All of the participants were already "spiritual", however, and the fact that they were agreeing to an experiment with a hallucinogen indicates something about their "openness" already, surely. The article also notes:Lasting change was found in the part of the personality known as openness, which includes traits related to imagination, aesthetics, feelings, abstract ideas and general broad-mindedness. Changes in these traits, measured on a widely used and scientifically validated personality inventory, were larger in magnitude than changes typically observed in healthy adults over decades of life experiences, the scientists say. Researchers in the field say that after the age of 30, personality doesn't usually change significantly.
"Normally, if anything, openness tends to decrease as people get older," says study leader Roland R. Griffiths, a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
As a word of caution, Griffiths also notes that some of the study participants reported strong fear or anxiety for a portion of their daylong psilocybin sessions, although none reported any lingering harmful effects. He cautions, however, that if hallucinogens are used in less well supervised settings, the possible fear or anxiety responses could lead to harmful behaviors.Count me out, thanks.
Monday, October 03, 2011
The Right gets a recruit
This post from his blog: The New World Order of the New Free World gives some idea of the scattergun mind of someone who the Nationals (and Abbott) seem to think would be a good candidate:
Do we really believe that this push for a Tax on Carbon pollution is about anything but raising more revenue for the government and the United Nations in league with the international banks using the “New World Order” as a blueprint for the Globalisation of the New Free World?The Right of politics in Australia and the USA , with few exceptions, is truly in an embarrassing state at the moment.
Are we so naive that we have ignored those warnings written about, not so long ago, by the likes of Toffler and his ilk about how these unseen people will have to come up with more and more ways to separate us from our hard earned cash?
I, for one, do not believe in this transparent lie of global warming, global warming created by us the population. Talking of population, why isn’t anyone talking about that as an issue related to this matter – the world is overpopulated but is anyone talking about reducing or slowing the population growth as a measure to slow this so called warming? No they aren’t!...
David Suzuki once said that to be a productive citizen of the world we should think globally and act locally. This is what we need to do now, to even begin to address issues that do now affect us and will affect us for years to come. The World was created by the perfect hand and prolific forests were always integral to the quality of life on this planet; I am suspicious of the attempt to take our focus away from such obvious problems as rampant logging of old growth forest and replacing them with new less understood but seemingly “hipper” subject matter....
I get suspicious. Who is pushing so hard? Gee, it’s big business cleverly or not so cleverly disguised as “do gooders”. This has been pointed out in emails that have been circulating in recent times worth investigating. Wouldn’t be the first time the international banking cartels have duped and enlisted the young and outraged to do their dirty work whilst preying on the fears of the older working population threatening them with their mortgage and livelihood, keeping us distracted with issues, like trying to educate our kids and keeping a roof over our heads, while they plot and scheme to fleece yet more of our money away from us.
An Australian birthday
This strikes me as a very distinctly Australian thing to happen - a sign of our egalitarianism that includes not taking the office of Prime Minister too seriously, and a politician who is definitely not "up herself".
Sunday, October 02, 2011
Domestic report
Here’s what’s been going on at home:
She is much less shy than before, but I hope she never learns to knock on the front door.
* Yesterday involved a bit of ambling driving around Brisbane, and on a whim, seeing we were at Hamilton already, I took a drive out to Pinkenba.
I grew up on the north side of Brisbane, and a trip out past the old airport to the strange combination of oil refinery, sewerage plant, houses and riverside shacks known as Pinkenba was always a novelty. I am happy to report that a trip to this strange part of town is still interesting. In fact, I am amazed as to how much of the old riverside land out beyond “Pinkenba Village” has been converted to light industrial. During the weekday, at least, it looks as if it would be a much more lively place than it used to be in the 60’s and 70’s.
There are more houses there than I remembered: some of them not too bad looking for the area. The small primary school, which looks very much like the old Nudgee Beach primary school also on the northside, appears to have closed late last year.
But the local hotel “The Pink” still exists, and from its website, looks a lot better on the inside than from the outside. (A prominent sign for the scheduled “Hot Girls” shows mark it out as place catering for young male workers who go to the expanded industrial estate, I guess.) While we drove past it, I suddenly remembered that I had brought something unusual from the bottle shop there once when I was young and used to visit unusual pubs occasionally for something to do. I think it was there that I bought a bottle of Gekkeikan sake – the only brand you could ever get in Australia decades ago. I didn’t care for the taste, but it represented a sort of foreshadowing of a turn my life would take. Certainly, I enjoy sake a lot now…
* Went kite flying today. Brisbane is not the best place for kite flying, at least if you are not near the coast, as I just don’t think it is that breezy a place. [Well, unless you are dealing with a summer storm, in which case it can be very breezy indeed, but only in short bursts.] But today was a good day for my daughter to get out a birthday present she got last year from a friend. It was from Aldi, which was a bad sign, and indeed it needed work with a pair of scissors usually reserved for eyebrows and nose hair to get rods into pockets which otherwise did not exist. But despite all of this, it flew quite well.
I find getting a kite airborne and keeping there for more than 10 minutes at a time is an unusually satisfying experience. I’m not sure about my daughter: I was reluctant to hand it over to her at all. (I’m joking, but as it turned out, she did relinquish it to me often.)
Like taking kids fishing, having a go at kite flying with them is something that just has to be tried at least once. That reminds me, we need to go fishing again to see if they can catch something next time. The first attempt only resulted in my wife getting something. My manly abilities to provide food from the wild for my family are still in question.
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Sunday, September 25, 2011
May be gone a while ....
The Doctor is back
It confirms my earlier observation that the big story arcs are the worst aspect of the show now. It seems that I am not alone in these thoughts.
An interesting idea
I've had a look at the paper, which is not written for the lay person, of course, but I remain a little uncertain as to whether he is claimed that this gravitational wave idea could explain away the apparent acceleration of the universe entirely, or only partially.
Thinking about teenagers
Mind Hacks liked the above article in National Geographic a lot, as it gives a fresh perspective on why teenagers take risks, other than the overly simplistic "brain's not fully developed yet" meme.
Saturday, September 24, 2011
"Overshare" (The correct name for Facebook)
I saw something on TV about his last night, and thought it looked terrible.
Manjoo actually hates the whole devaluation of privacy that Facebook imposes much less than me, but his point is still good: if Facebook makes it easier to share any old rubbish, it is killing taste and the exercise of good judgement.
About Ebert
Maureen Dowd wrote this review of movie critic Roger Ebert's new memoir.
I am not the world's greatest fan of Ebert's reviews. I tend to find him inconsistent; sometimes too forgiving, sometimes far too nitpicking. He doesn't write with the depth and wit of Pauline Kael, but still, I am usually curious to see what he thought of a movie if I have seen it and have my own strong reaction for or against.
Sometimes he really despairs of modern tastes in movies, and I understand the sentiment. He really hated Kick-Ass, for example, and called it morally reprehensible. This half tempts me to see it, because I don't really like morally reprehensible things to pass without enough condemnation.
I knew almost nothing of his personal life, except that his writing sometimes gave me the feeling that he may be gay. Turns out he's married (well, I think I did read that some time ago) to an African American (I didn't know that), but he did marry late due to the influence of a very domineering mother. Dowd writes:
Well, certainly sounds like the conditions were right for my suspicion.Ebert writes about his own alcoholism — his last drink was in 1979 — and that of his mother, who wielded a ’50s Catholic sexual repression that retarded Roger’s ability to “make free” with girls and produced a few scenes with a whiff of “Psycho.”
His mother’s recriminations about his girlfriends, as well as his drinking, caused him to live vicariously through movies and kept him “unmarried for an unnatural length of time. Did I know drinking made me unmarriageable, or did I simply put drinking ahead of marriage?”
The review spends a fair bit of time on Ebert's illness (jaw and related cancers which have led to massive facial surgery which failed, and he's now unable to speak and has to eat through a gastric feeding tube.) Poor guy. As Dowd notes, though, he's remarkably upbeat about the fact that he is still alive.
Don't hold your breath
As I hoped, Cosmic Variance has the best commentary on the faster than light neutrino story I've seen. I liked this in comments too:
a nicely nuanced and non-dismissive interpretation of a nicely nuanced and non-hyperbolic announcement that has, predictably but unfortunately, resulted in a comically un-nuanced (perhaps even anti-nuanced) avalanche of headlines.Seems about right.
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Violence down
This review contains a detailed summary of Pinker's book long argument that humanity has become much less violent over the centuries. It sounds like a fascinating read. Here are some extracts (of the review, not the book):
Pinker thinks that most of what we believe about violence is wrong. To convince us he sets himself two tasks. First, to demonstrate that the past was a far nastier place than we might have imagined. Second, that the present is far nicer than we might have noticed. So to start with we get a litany of horrors from ancient and not-so-ancient history: a catalogue of the unspeakable things that human beings have traditionally been willing to do to each other. This is slightly overdone, since anyone who thinks that, say, medieval Europe was a friendly, peaceable place can't have thought about it very much. Still, it is hard not to be occasionally struck dumb by just how horrible people used to be. The image I can't get out of my head is of a hollow brass cow used for roasting people alive. Its mouth was left open so that their screams would sound like the cow was mooing, adding to the amusement of onlookers.
The real fascination of this book is how we got from being a species that enjoyed the spectacle of roasting each other alive to one that believes child-killers have the same rights as everyone else. ...
At the heart of this book is Pinker's careful, compelling account of why the 20th century does not invalidate his thesis that violence is in a long decline. He makes his case in three ways. First, with a multitude of tables and charts he shows that our view of the century is coloured by presentism: we think it's the worst simply because it's the most recent and we know more about it. If we had equivalent coverage of the whole of human history (how many books have been published about the second world war compared to, say, the Mongol conquests of the 13th century?) we would see that all of it has been scarred by mass slaughters, some of them proportionately even worse than the horrors of the past hundred years.
Second, Pinker argues that the violence of the 20th century is best understood as a series of random spasms rather than part of a trend.