It seemed time for my once a decade or so trip to the theatre, and what more popular show could I pick than War Horse?
I liked the Spielberg movie a lot, as did my son, and so I also took him to the stage play (the first real professional show he has seen.)
This might have been a bit of a mistake. The normal progress is to see a stage show and then the film, and the added realism of the latter does not jar in any sense. But I think, especially for a younger person, seeing the film first adds to the awareness of the "staginess" of a stage production. He still liked it, more or less, but did comment that the some of the actors seemed to be being too dramatic. I said that it's something you have to get used to in live theatre - it doesn't allow for whispers and the same subtlety of acting as does the audio and close ups of cinema.
But as for my reaction: I assume it has been said before, but I kept thinking while watching it "this is like a masterclass of the very best in stagecraft and what can be achieved in theatre." The lighting design, the sets which work with suggestion more than materials, the back projection, the music, the use of songs as linking device, and, of course, the puppetry. I mean, it is kind of ridiculous triumph of theatre that the reunion of a man and his (artificial) horse makes a substantial number in the audience cry.
I saw part of a documentary of how the show was made in Britain a few months ago - it took an extraordinarily long time, with a huge number of people involved. They really deserve their success.
I was going to end this by noting that I would not go so far as to say that it has cured me of a preference for the additional realism of cinema; but really, they both deserve admiration whenever they work and win over an audience.