It was disappointing to hear Fran Kelly on Radio National yesterday having a jolly interview with Art Laffer in which she did not raise the matter of Kansas and its disastrous, on going, tax cutting experiment.
Unemployment in Kansas - lagging badly.
Lost revenue in Kansas - credit rating lowered, roads and school funding cut.
Art Laffer - still defending it.
Wednesday, March 18, 2015
No warning first?
BBC News - Judges sacked for watching porn
I can understand the public service, and private companies for that matter, having policies against use of work internet access to distribute pornography in any fashion, or the watching of any that is illegal, or in circumstances where any other staff could possibly see or know that a person was watching or using it. And a blanket approach certainly avoid any issues of trying to categorise less or more acceptable breaches of the rule.
But surely, everyone recognises there is a scale of seriousness in which such a blanket rule could be breached?
And it's not as if the access costs to the internet are likely to raise the issue of these judges wasting public money by (say) watching 5 minutes of vanilla porn when everyone else in the office has gone home, as against downloading some recent case law.
So one would imagine a detected breach should result in at least a warning first, and not an instant dismissal.
I can understand the public service, and private companies for that matter, having policies against use of work internet access to distribute pornography in any fashion, or the watching of any that is illegal, or in circumstances where any other staff could possibly see or know that a person was watching or using it. And a blanket approach certainly avoid any issues of trying to categorise less or more acceptable breaches of the rule.
But surely, everyone recognises there is a scale of seriousness in which such a blanket rule could be breached?
And it's not as if the access costs to the internet are likely to raise the issue of these judges wasting public money by (say) watching 5 minutes of vanilla porn when everyone else in the office has gone home, as against downloading some recent case law.
So one would imagine a detected breach should result in at least a warning first, and not an instant dismissal.
Ice plume explanation for Ceres?
Bright spots on Ceres could be active ice : Nature News & Comment
“What is amazing is that you can see the feature while the rim is still in the line of sight,” said Andreas Nathues, a planetary scientist at the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Göttingen, Germany. Nathues, who leads the team for one of the Dawn cameras, showedAn asteroid made of 1/4 ice? Might be a good place for settlement then, except for the fact there is next to no gravity, I suppose.
the images on 17 March at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in The Woodlands, Texas.
At dawn on Ceres, feature number 5 appears bright. By dusk, it seems to fade. That could
mean sunlight plays an important role — for instance, by heating up ice just beneath the surface and causing it blast off in some kind of plume r other feature.
Ceres is believed to be made of at least one-quarter ice, more so than most asteroids. Dawn’s goals to figure out where that ice resides and what role it plays in shaping the asteroid’s surface. One idea is that the ice is blanketed by a very thin layer of soil. The ice may occasionally squirt up in towering ‘cryovolcanoes’, thanks to internal pressures within the asteroid.
Tuesday, March 17, 2015
Taking nutters seriously?
EPA debunks 'chemtrails,' further fueling conspiracy theories ( video) - CSMonitor.com
I suppose it's better, on balance, that a government agency actually addresses conspiracy nutters; but it's a shame in a way that they are being treated as worthy of even addressing.
Perhaps the EPA's statement should have been more "calling a spade a spade"; something like "if you genuinely believe this global conspiracy, there's a good chance you need psychiatric help."
I suppose it's better, on balance, that a government agency actually addresses conspiracy nutters; but it's a shame in a way that they are being treated as worthy of even addressing.
Perhaps the EPA's statement should have been more "calling a spade a spade"; something like "if you genuinely believe this global conspiracy, there's a good chance you need psychiatric help."
Have to agree
Joe Hockey outclassed on Q&A, by an economist
Mind you, it's not hard for Joe to be "outclassed". He's just a windbag who shows no consistency in painting an economic picture. A poor ministerial performer out of a government full of them.
Update: Ha! Judith Sloan thinks Peter Martin is an idiot for saying Daley was more credible than Hockey, in a ranty, shouty, straw man and nonsense filled post at Catallaxy. (Why is she never this ranty on TV? Why won't she repeat some of her more ludicrous claims there, but adopt a pretence at being more moderate than she really is?)
Her argument that abolishing negative gearing would be "double taxation" is particularly hard to follow, and I had to search the internet to remind myself how she even comes up with it. In this takedown of her arguments, we get this explanation from JS:
In other of the collection of her "Greatest Hits of Nonsense": she won't read The Economist because it is "deeply Green, deeply Keynesian". (Belief in climate change as a serious issue is an automatic disqualifier for 'seriousness' for dear Judith.) And let's not forget, Australia's compulsory superannuation "is a tax". (Again, a completely individual use of terminology, as far as I can tell.)
Mind you, it's not hard for Joe to be "outclassed". He's just a windbag who shows no consistency in painting an economic picture. A poor ministerial performer out of a government full of them.
Update: Ha! Judith Sloan thinks Peter Martin is an idiot for saying Daley was more credible than Hockey, in a ranty, shouty, straw man and nonsense filled post at Catallaxy. (Why is she never this ranty on TV? Why won't she repeat some of her more ludicrous claims there, but adopt a pretence at being more moderate than she really is?)
Her argument that abolishing negative gearing would be "double taxation" is particularly hard to follow, and I had to search the internet to remind myself how she even comes up with it. In this takedown of her arguments, we get this explanation from JS:
To eliminate negative gearing would be to introduce double taxation. The flip side of an investor taking a loan to buy an asset is a lender providing the loan. And that lender pays taxation on the associated profit.As the article notes:
Sloan’s argument that “the flip side of an investor taking a loan to buy an asset is a lender providing the loan” and that to disallow the cost of borrowing by investors would amount to “double taxation” is ridiculous.
Using this logic, the private health insurance rebate is not really a cost to the budget, since it is income in the hands of health funds that in turn pay tax to the government. Using the same logic, childcare should be made tax deductible, since childcare centres would earn higher profits, part of which would also be remitted back to the government via company tax (not to mention the extra income taxes paid by childcare workers). To do otherwise would amount to double-taxation, according to Sloan’s twisted logic.It is plainly nonsense, involving Sloan creating what amounts to her special meaning for the phrase "double taxation".
In other of the collection of her "Greatest Hits of Nonsense": she won't read The Economist because it is "deeply Green, deeply Keynesian". (Belief in climate change as a serious issue is an automatic disqualifier for 'seriousness' for dear Judith.) And let's not forget, Australia's compulsory superannuation "is a tax". (Again, a completely individual use of terminology, as far as I can tell.)
Monday, March 16, 2015
Douthat on the poor
For Poorer and Richer - NYTimes.com
Ross Douthat makes a brief contribution to the debate about whether the "social crisis" amongst the American poor is a problem of economics or culture.
He seems to think both sides have some valid points, although (not to my surprise, given his constant Catholic angst about the sexual revolution) he leads more to blaming culture change.
He does make one point which, I think, has some validity, and it's one that has surfaced from time to time in the threads of the Catallaxy blog, before their permanent decline into name calling tedium and obsession:
Ross Douthat makes a brief contribution to the debate about whether the "social crisis" amongst the American poor is a problem of economics or culture.
He seems to think both sides have some valid points, although (not to my surprise, given his constant Catholic angst about the sexual revolution) he leads more to blaming culture change.
He does make one point which, I think, has some validity, and it's one that has surfaced from time to time in the threads of the Catallaxy blog, before their permanent decline into name calling tedium and obsession:
But recognizing that culture shapes behavior and that moral frameworks matter doesn’t require thundering denunciations of the moral choices of the poor. Instead, our upper class should be judged first — for being too solipsistic to recognize that its present ideal of “safe” permissiveness works (sort of) only for the privileged, and for failing to take any moral responsibility (in the schools it runs, the mass entertainments it produces, the social agenda it favors) for the effects of permissiveness on the less-savvy, the less protected, the kids who don’t have helicopter parents turning off the television or firewalling the porn.It's a worry, my giving quasi-support to the uber Catholics of Catallaxy who think the world started all going wrong in about 1960; but Catholicism and economic libertarianism were always philosophically incompatible. Bigger fool the Catholics for staying in that marriage of convenience, just because they think a mutual hatred of a third party should keep them happy together.
Hello, Thomas
Edison Worked on a Spirit Phone to Record Voices of the Dead | Mysterious Universe
I think I've heard about this before, but I didn't recall that he had been happy to explain all about it in the first edition of his memoir.
I think I've heard about this before, but I didn't recall that he had been happy to explain all about it in the first edition of his memoir.
Probably a good sign that the policy is OK
Rupert Murdoch blasts Malcolm Turnbull over media reform
But, seeing I have trouble keeping fresh in mind the arcane world of media ownership and broadcast rights in Australia, maybe I'm wrong...
But, seeing I have trouble keeping fresh in mind the arcane world of media ownership and broadcast rights in Australia, maybe I'm wrong...
Unintentionally amusing comment
'Horsewoman of the Apocalypse': Liberals defend Peta Credlin against text attack
Julie Bishop commenting on this story:
Julie Bishop commenting on this story:
"It's very colourful language," Ms Bishop told Sky News.
"It's deeply unfortunate it has been said and been made public.
"The less the internal workings of the Liberal Party are made public, the better off for everybody."
When even Cory Bernardi is against it...
Remarkable news this morning that even Cory Bernardi is against Christopher Pyne's threat to cut (not very expensive) science funding if he doesn't get his way on massive University reforms which came out of the blue after the election.
What's not so surprising is Senator Leyonhjelm's predicatable and purely ideological driven support of no government funding for science:
What's not so surprising is Senator Leyonhjelm's predicatable and purely ideological driven support of no government funding for science:
But Liberal Democrat David Leyonhjelm said he had no qualms about cuts to research because government funding crowded out the private sector.
"I'd wind back government-funded research in a heartbeat, it's hard to justify in a climate of big deficits," Senator Leyonhjelm said.Doofus.
Keynesian pursuits
Last week Jason Soon linked to a review of a new biography about Keynes that appeared in the (UK) Telegraph. That review only paid short attention to the parts of the book about his tangled love life, noting as follows:
Over the weekend, I found a review by the aging, Lefty turned Conservative, Paul Johnson, who was happy to expound more upon this part of the book:
This guy (I have no idea who he is, writing in Forbes in quasi defence of Niall Ferguson's silly comment that Keynes' homosexuality influenced his economics) at least explains the culture of his times in (what sounds like) an accurate way:
Anyway, Paul Johnson seems very enamoured of the book, and for a crusty Conservative, he actually seems to hold Keynes in high regard.
* If only TV and Australian Googlebox had been around at Cambridge back in the 19th century, perhaps everyone would have giggled away the idea of gay couples as having the higher attainment of intellectual purity.
Keynes’s love of ballet was strengthened through his wife, the Russian ballerina Lydia Lopokova, but in the decade prior to his marriage, Keynes had been an active homosexual – even keeping statistics on his sexual encounters. The tangled and overlapping love lives of the Bloomsbury set is as confusing as it is salacious but if this section drags, this is only a small eddy in a book which otherwise flows freely.Well, there's no fun in that lack of detail, is there?
Over the weekend, I found a review by the aging, Lefty turned Conservative, Paul Johnson, who was happy to expound more upon this part of the book:
Universal Man contains a fact-packed chapter entitled 'Lover', which contains a good deal of new (to me, at least) information. Keynes's letters chronicle 'the initiations, experiments, risks, sprees, settled confidence and ultimate stability of his sexual history'. Keynes first had sexual intercourse with another male in 1901, when he was seventeen. He discovered (or said he did) that at Cambridge 'practically everybody ... is an open or avowed sodomite'. Apostles divided their activities into 'higher sodomy', which was non-physical but intense, and 'lower sodomy', which was anything else. Keynes performed both, using his persuasive powers for what he called 'flirtation', and his affairs embraced a formidable number of people. Sometimes merely the intimate exchange of ideas was involved - for Keynes intelligence was a major sexual component. Thus he conceived of Einstein, whom he met in 1926, as 'a naughty Jew-boy, covered with ink, pulling a long nose as the world kicks his bottom; a sweet imp, pure and giggling ... I had indeed a little flirt with him.' In the same vein, after a meeting with Lloyd George he wrote, 'I had a terrible flirtation with Ll. G. yesterday.' After Cambridge he transferred his activities to London, writing to Lytton Strachey in 1906, 'I am off to dine at a low sodomitical haunt in Soho ... where guardsmen offer their services at half a crown a bottom.' He compiled, in 1915 or 1916, a list of his sexual partners, identified by their initials and years, showing the wide range of his conquests, from 'lift boy of Vauxhall' and 'sixteen year old under Etna' to 'stable boy of Park Lane' and 'the Chemist's boy of Paris'. The social mix was striking, and included 'the clergyman' and 'Grand Duke Cyril of the Paris Baths'.It's rather strange a century later to read about the way the English intelligentsia became so enamoured of the idea of homosexual love as (potentially) a thing of purity and beauty, and intellectualised it so much.* I'm sure I've read that the blame goes back to a 19th century revival of scholarship into ancient Greece. (The ancient Romans thought the Greeks were so enthusiastically gay because they spent too much time wrestling nude; little did anyone see that naked male pastimes 2,300 years ago would lead to betrayals of Western values to an evil brand of socialism in the 20th Century. I'm referring of course to the Cambridge spy ring, not Keynes.)
This guy (I have no idea who he is, writing in Forbes in quasi defence of Niall Ferguson's silly comment that Keynes' homosexuality influenced his economics) at least explains the culture of his times in (what sounds like) an accurate way:
He [Keynes] was not ‘gay’ in the modern sense of the world, fighting against prejudice and bullying from a bigoted establishment. Keynes and his circle were the establishment, whose prejudice led them to bully others. The Cambridge Apostles is the definitive book on the group in which Keynes lived and moved and had his being. He and his circle embraced what they called ‘the higher sodomy’ which was based on the idea, not just that sodomy should be tolerated, but that everything else was inferior. The philosophy of the higher sodomy held that the highest form of human relations was one in which men of refinement, intellect, class and aesthetic superiority combined their male friendships with sexual relations. To go to the club and converse with men of high intellect and then to have to go home to the little woman is a lower life, a falling short of the higher sodomy.
As Strachey’s biographer put it:Interesting. I suppose you could argue that the rise of feminism has meant the fall of homosexual intellectual elitism, which is a good thing all around. Funny too, given that both feminism and the gay lobby now are considered allies, especially in some dubious identity politics.
“They thought that love of young men was a higher form of love. They had been brought up and educated to believe that women were inferior —in mind and body. If from the ethical point of view . . . love should be attached only to worthy objects, then love of young men was, they believed, ethically better than love of women.”We have to avoid anachronisms here: Keynes was not the friend of the bride in a modern rom-com, who loved to gossip with the girls. He was drenched in, and in some ways intensified, a culture of misogyny which was characteristic of both his particular era and of his academic milieu. The movement to sexually integrate British universities was a matter of great debate during Keynes’ time at Cambridge. The intensity of feeling is hard for modern people to imagine: Dorothy Sayers’ excellent mystery, Gaudy Night, uses this as the backdrop to a series of crimes and provides Sayers, a Christian feminist (and the only female member of CS Lewis and JRR Tolkien’s famous Inklings literary society,) with the opportunity to make the case for women’s equality. Keynes himself actively criticized integration, at least in his own case, opposed having women in his classroom. He went so far as to say that he found female modes of thinking repellant:
“I think I shall have to give up teaching females after this year. The nervous irritation caused by two hours’ contact with them is intense. I seem to hate every movement of their minds. The minds of the men, even when they are stupid and ugly, never appear to me so repellent”
Anyway, Paul Johnson seems very enamoured of the book, and for a crusty Conservative, he actually seems to hold Keynes in high regard.
* If only TV and Australian Googlebox had been around at Cambridge back in the 19th century, perhaps everyone would have giggled away the idea of gay couples as having the higher attainment of intellectual purity.
Friday, March 13, 2015
Floating to the edge of space
Hey, here's some information on one balloon based competitor to Branson's harebrained space tourism venture.
It seems that for about half the price, rich folk will get a 5 to 6 hour ride, spending 2 hours looking at the view from 30 km, without the possible stomach churning effect of sudden weightlessness. Then they come back down on an already deployed parawing, ending up perhaps 200 to 300 km from where they took off.
This sounds much, much safer than the rocket powered joyride in the space rocket with the weird moving wing design.
Here's the World View Experience website, with some pretty illustrations.
I wish them luck.
It seems that for about half the price, rich folk will get a 5 to 6 hour ride, spending 2 hours looking at the view from 30 km, without the possible stomach churning effect of sudden weightlessness. Then they come back down on an already deployed parawing, ending up perhaps 200 to 300 km from where they took off.
This sounds much, much safer than the rocket powered joyride in the space rocket with the weird moving wing design.
Here's the World View Experience website, with some pretty illustrations.
I wish them luck.
Catty
A certain accidental Senator seems to me to be a bit "needy" for attention. He's given to making speeches to an empty Senate chamber (I suppose, to keep his huge [/sarc], accidental voting base appraised of his views on guns, gay marriage, and how awful government really is) but it has now extended to include puff pieces on, for goodness sake, the cats in his life.
While it's not surprising to know he follows the Heinlein line on how cats are a libertarian's preferred pet, many readers of the Guardian piece have noted the irony of the way Senator Blofeld then emphasises the importance of keeping furry libertarian analogues under the strictest control.
Yes, that is true: cats can't be trusted to do the right thing, just like their fur-free political analogues....
While it's not surprising to know he follows the Heinlein line on how cats are a libertarian's preferred pet, many readers of the Guardian piece have noted the irony of the way Senator Blofeld then emphasises the importance of keeping furry libertarian analogues under the strictest control.
Yes, that is true: cats can't be trusted to do the right thing, just like their fur-free political analogues....
In which I do not criticise Freedom Boy (much)
The Australian government's data retention scheme is not 1984 come to life | Tim Wilson | Comment is free | The Guardian
Good Lord - the nation's most irritating, self aggrandising, political appointee to the Human Rights Commission has written a column on data retention that is moderate and reasonable, and I can't really find anything about it to criticise.
Next point - why has he started wearing a cowboy hat on twitter, the twit?
Good Lord - the nation's most irritating, self aggrandising, political appointee to the Human Rights Commission has written a column on data retention that is moderate and reasonable, and I can't really find anything about it to criticise.
Next point - why has he started wearing a cowboy hat on twitter, the twit?
Please explain
Paul Grimes sacked over lack of 'strong, mutual confidence' with Barnaby Joyce | Australia news | The Guardian
I still don't follow exactly what has gone here. Is the implication that Grimes was going to dispute Barnaby Joyce's claim that changes to Hansard had not been directed by him (Joyce), but then he didn't, for reasons unknown? If so, can't that be stated more clearly in reporting?
I still don't follow exactly what has gone here. Is the implication that Grimes was going to dispute Barnaby Joyce's claim that changes to Hansard had not been directed by him (Joyce), but then he didn't, for reasons unknown? If so, can't that be stated more clearly in reporting?
Oh look - another bit of rubbish from the pages of The Australian
Unfinished business for Abbott, Brandis | The Australian
Chris Merritt here overlooks an obvious solution - replace Tony Abbott with Malcolm Turnbull and the Triggs "problem" goes away.
Merritt's argument is rubbish anyway - does he think a government can fairly remove an appointee to a statutory authority just by arguing they think the person is biased by the timing of one report? The Coalition complaint about Triggs is trumped up, bullying rubbish.
Saying that Triggs has to go because of the government not liking her (which is essentially all that has happened) is ludicrous. Triggs isn't hurting the HRC - it's the government that has shot itself in the foot.
Chris Merritt here overlooks an obvious solution - replace Tony Abbott with Malcolm Turnbull and the Triggs "problem" goes away.
Merritt's argument is rubbish anyway - does he think a government can fairly remove an appointee to a statutory authority just by arguing they think the person is biased by the timing of one report? The Coalition complaint about Triggs is trumped up, bullying rubbish.
Saying that Triggs has to go because of the government not liking her (which is essentially all that has happened) is ludicrous. Triggs isn't hurting the HRC - it's the government that has shot itself in the foot.
Gene fiddling caution
Scientists sound alarm over DNA editing of human embryos : Nature News & Comment
Note that the gene editing is said to be of benefit for preventing inherited diseases.
As with "three parent babies" - the obvious advice "just don't have your own baby" to people with clear inheritable, serious diseases just seems too hard in this age of entitlement.
Note that the gene editing is said to be of benefit for preventing inherited diseases.
As with "three parent babies" - the obvious advice "just don't have your own baby" to people with clear inheritable, serious diseases just seems too hard in this age of entitlement.
The poor and their values
When Values Disappear - NYTimes.com
This short Krugman column leads to an interesting argument about the relationship between poverty and values.
This short Krugman column leads to an interesting argument about the relationship between poverty and values.
If you want a dose of "brony" weirdness for today...
What a masculinity conference taught me about the state of men | Life and style | The Guardian
(Actually, there are some comments which make some decent points - and many that don't. One that I agree with: "Is the hairstyle affected by the author an attempt to be more like a My Little Pony?" Ha.)
(Actually, there are some comments which make some decent points - and many that don't. One that I agree with: "Is the hairstyle affected by the author an attempt to be more like a My Little Pony?" Ha.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)