I see that the IPA, Sinclair Davidson and his blog are promoting heavily a new book by the zero credibility Ian Plimer that insists the only way to help the global poor is to burn more coal - lots more coal:
Catallaxy is full of hilarious hyperbole from its conservative cohort about how this communist Pope is trying to kill millions by arguing that increased CO2 is not the way to go.
But in all honesty - if an economist can't see through the complete and utter bulldust that an aging geologist has been specialising in for some years now, there's no reason to trust his or her judgement on anything.
Wednesday, October 28, 2015
Floods and climate change, continued
Just noticed a recent paper:
Severe flooding occurred in Thailand during the 2011 summer season, which resulted in more than 800 deaths and affected 13.6 million people. The unprecedented nature of this flood in the Chao Phraya River Basin (CPRB) was examined and compared with historical flood years. Climate diagnostics were conducted to understand the meteorological conditions and climate forcing that lead to the magnitude and duration of this flood. Neither the monsoon rainfall nor the tropical cyclone frequency anomalies alone was sufficient to cause the 2011 flooding event. Instead, a series of abnormal conditions collectively contributed to the intensity of the 2011 flood: anomalously high rainfall in the pre-monsoon season especially during March; record-high soil moisture content thorough the year; elevated sea level height in the Gulf of Thailand which constrained drainage, as well as other water management factors. In the context of climate change, the substantially increased pre-monsoon rainfall in CPRB after 1980 and the continual sea level rise in the river outlet have both played a role. The rainfall increase is associated with a strengthening of the pre-monsoon northeasterly winds that come from East Asia. Attribution analysis using the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 historical experiments pointed to the anthropogenic greenhouse gases as the main external climate forcing leading to the rainfall increase. Together, these findings suggest increasing odds for potential flooding similar to the 2011 flood intensity.
Not a cent from me
Apple is a ridiculously successful company:
Apple has more than $205bn of cash in the bank, the company revealed on Tuesday as its chief executive Tim Cook said the firm had made more than $234bn in 2015, making it its “most successful year ever”.I'm not sure their doing anything really useful with their money, though, apart from throwing it in the air and letting it fall on their head, McDuck style. I suggest establishing a private air force with which to blow up coal mines or their train lines. (Useful and would annoy Bill Gates, too!)
The California company now has more money in the bank than the Czech Republic, Peru and New Zealand make in gross domestic product (GDP) a year, according to World Bank statistics. Apple’s cash balances increased by $2.8bn in the last three months alone.
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Diamonds in the sky
Climate scientists ponder spraying diamond dust in the sky to cool planet : Nature News & Comment
The diamonds part sounds a bit wacky.
The diamonds part sounds a bit wacky.
Hmmm.
The AFR is being openly gossipy about Tony Abbott and Peta Credlin:
This is going to be pretty hard for some of you to get your heads around, so I guess I better just tell it to you straight:
So, about that Margaret Thatcher lecture that Tony Abbott is delivering in London on Tuesday night – you know, the privately funded trip which, according to the former PM's office, he's being accompanied on with his wife, Margie Abbott?
If only the travelling party was really so conventional. See, there's also a villa in France, where, following the big speech, Abbott will be retiring for a period of convalescence with his former chief of staff, Peta Credlin, his C-bombing advancer, Richard Dowdy, (aptly named) and his mysterious press office veteran, Nicole Chant.
And you thought Credlin joining the then PM (sans wife Margie, but avec daughter Frances Abbott) skiing at Perisher in July was a little unusual!
We wonder if Margie will be joining the French party or steering well clear? If we're all still talking about Ainsley Gotto nearly 50 years after she ran John Gorton's PMO, Abbott's Last Tango Near Paris will certainly be one for the history books.
I remarked at the time that the publicity given in an Abbott friendly News Ltd paper to Abbott and Credlin skiing together was rather unusual. Now Fairfax is joining in.
Surely this latest piece should be the cause of some complaint if there is nothing to the Abbott/Credlin relationship?
Update: I see that on Twitter, The Australian has tweeted that Credlin "became more like a first lady" (as noted in its linked story on the Abbott downfall.) The full quote in the article:
I can't work out what is going on here. Is it that they are emboldened that Abbott or Credlin will not address the innuendo directly, because there is something to it? And what about the spouses? If this is just scurrilous gossip, why aren't they making their displeasure known?
I have said before, if something is going to be revealed about the Abbott Credlin relationship that has been known by journalists for years, people should be furious if it is only done now, after the "family man" campaign Abbott ran for years against Gillard (and, in a sense, Rudd, in the last election).
Update: I see that on Twitter, The Australian has tweeted that Credlin "became more like a first lady" (as noted in its linked story on the Abbott downfall.) The full quote in the article:
If there was one overarching, final loyalty from the prime minister, it was to his chief of staff. She had become almost a first lady, accompanying Abbott to everything from private dinners at the New York home of Rupert Murdoch to private snow-skiing holidays with Abbott and his daughter Frances. The chief of staff was the one introduced to foreign leaders. She interrupted to answer questions others put to Abbott, ruled the strategy, and used her power and intellect to barricade his office against the outside. His colleagues came to see their relationship as impenetrable and toxic for the government. But Abbott had empowered Credlin and, in the end, it was Abbott’s call. He gave her free rein. He called his colleagues sexist for challenging her.Sounds to me like subtle innuendo?
I can't work out what is going on here. Is it that they are emboldened that Abbott or Credlin will not address the innuendo directly, because there is something to it? And what about the spouses? If this is just scurrilous gossip, why aren't they making their displeasure known?
I have said before, if something is going to be revealed about the Abbott Credlin relationship that has been known by journalists for years, people should be furious if it is only done now, after the "family man" campaign Abbott ran for years against Gillard (and, in a sense, Rudd, in the last election).
Unliveable desert countries
I'm told by a relative that Doha is already an unbearable place to live for any length of time, but researchers are saying that the Arabian Gulf is going to get much worse and perhaps become virtually unliveable*:
A human body may be able to adapt to extremes of dry-bulb temperature (commonly referred to as simply temperature) through perspiration and associated evaporative cooling provided that the wet-bulb temperature (a combined measure of temperature and humidity or degree of ‘mugginess’) remains below a threshold of 35 °C. (ref. 1). This threshold defines a limit of survivability for a fit human under well-ventilated outdoor conditions and is lower for most people. We project using an ensemble of high-resolution regional climate model simulations that extremes of wet-bulb temperature in the region around the Arabian Gulf are likely to approach and exceed this critical threshold under the business-as-usual scenario of future greenhouse gas concentrations. Our results expose a specific regional hotspot where climate change, in the absence of significant mitigation, is likely to severely impact human habitability in the future.* OK, without airconditioning. Although, it's actually pretty incredible to me that people lived there at all before airconditioning. Here's the summary from phys.org:
It would still be rare, and cities such as Abu Dhabi, Dubai and Doha wouldn't quite be uninhabitable, thanks to air conditioning. But for people living and working outside or those with no air conditioning, it would be intolerable, said Eltahir and Pal. While Mecca won't be quite as hot, the heat will likely still cause many deaths during the annual hajj pilgrimage, Eltahir said.
Furry Hannibal Lecters
The case against otters: necrophiliac, serial-killing fur monsters of the sea - Vox
Wow. This article really makes the case for otters having some very surprising, and horrible, behaviours.
Wow. This article really makes the case for otters having some very surprising, and horrible, behaviours.
Nasty virus tricks
HIV latency: a high-stakes game of hide and seek
It's interesting to read about the devious way HIV, even when people are on treatment, hides itself:
What a nasty virus it remains.
It's interesting to read about the devious way HIV, even when people are on treatment, hides itself:
In latent infection, HIV integrates its genetic material into the DNA of the patient and becomes “silent”.
A brilliant added tool is the use of a long-lived critical cell of the immune system, the resting T cell, as its preferred hiding site. These latently infected resting T cells can slowly divide and, given HIV is now part of the patient’s DNA, the HIV is passed down to the daughter cells too.
HIV usually replicates in activated T cells and can efficiently kill those cells in several ways. First, the virus directly damages the outer membrane of the cell. This membrane usually keeps the cell intact.
Following infection of a cell, bits of the virus are quickly revealed to the immune system which, once activated, can zoom in and eliminate the infected cell.As the article also notes, people who go off the antiviral drugs quickly get high viral counts - within weeks.
However, if the virus manages to get inside a resting cell, in contrast to an activated T cell, all the machinery needed to produce new viruses is not available and the virus life cycle essentially shuts down.
If things shut down after the virus has already entered the patient’s DNA it gets stuck there – forever.
What a nasty virus it remains.
Yet more on climate policy
Here's a very worthy bit of commentary about the Vox article I posted about on Sunday - pointing out that one has to be on the lookout for fatalism in the way the problem is described. (It's by Michael Tobis, who is doing guest posts at ATTP lately.)
Movie economics
Turns out that Greg Jericho knows a lot about the matter of government subsidy for the movie business.
I suspect that the benefits of this sort of government support are a bit stronger than Jericho thinks. I reckon that of the type of industries government can be seen to be helping, this one has a certain high profile, confidence building factor that others don't share. All the publicity surrounding a major star staying for protracted periods on the Gold Coast or in Sydney (and saying nice things about these places) must count for something, no? (Unless, of course, you are Barnaby Joyce and manage to turn a national image of relative youth and vigour into something more resembling a patronising fogey-ness.)
I suspect that the benefits of this sort of government support are a bit stronger than Jericho thinks. I reckon that of the type of industries government can be seen to be helping, this one has a certain high profile, confidence building factor that others don't share. All the publicity surrounding a major star staying for protracted periods on the Gold Coast or in Sydney (and saying nice things about these places) must count for something, no? (Unless, of course, you are Barnaby Joyce and manage to turn a national image of relative youth and vigour into something more resembling a patronising fogey-ness.)
Monday, October 26, 2015
About Gary
I've been reading up a little about Gary Powers, the key figure in Bridge of Spies.
The Smithsonian.com has a short article about him, which contains a couple of surprises (he was allowed a conjugal visit with his wife, but she was an unfaithful alcoholic; and he kept a journal while in prison that indicates he may have had a touch of Stockholm syndrome.)
His son has a website up, which doesn't have a lot of content, but some of it is interesting.
As for the old poison needle in the coin trick: yes, this was true and the poison used was saxitoxin, derived from shellfish.
You can even read an account of his accident on the CIA website, where we get a good description of his dangerous exit from the U2:
The Smithsonian.com has a short article about him, which contains a couple of surprises (he was allowed a conjugal visit with his wife, but she was an unfaithful alcoholic; and he kept a journal while in prison that indicates he may have had a touch of Stockholm syndrome.)
His son has a website up, which doesn't have a lot of content, but some of it is interesting.
As for the old poison needle in the coin trick: yes, this was true and the poison used was saxitoxin, derived from shellfish.
You can even read an account of his accident on the CIA website, where we get a good description of his dangerous exit from the U2:
The young pilot had been flying for almost four hours when he heard a dull thump, the aircraft lurched forward, and there was a bright orange flash from a nearby surface-to-air missile. The plane’s right wing began to droop and the nose started to go down. Powers tried to correct it, but the plane continued its downward trajectory. Powers was uncertain if the control cable had been severed or if the tail was gone. He was certain, however, that he no longer had control of the plane.Maybe not exactly as portrayed in the movie, but pretty close.
Powers initial reaction was to pull the destruct switches, but he decided he’d better secure an exit plan for himself first. This, however, was proving difficult as the g forces had hurled him to the nose of the plane, which was spinning tail first towards the earth. Powers thought of ejecting but realized, in his current position, he likely would have had both off his legs cut off while trying to escape the plane.
On the verge of panic, Powers decided he would climb out of the plane. The whirling aircraft had passed thirty-four thousand feet when he removed the canopy. He took off his seat-belt, which sent him flying halfway out of the aircraft. His face plate frosted over rendering him visionless. Powers tried to get to the destruct switches twice but, realizing time was running out, he began kicking frantically and miraculously the oxygen hoses that were holding him hostage in the U-2 broke and freed him from the spiraling plane.
Suddenly, all was silent, except for the rustling of material as the chute opened and settled in the wind. Powers hung in the air desperately trying to comprehend what had just happened and trying to assess his current situation. He was fifteen thousand feet above the Soviet Union and the ground was growing ever closer. As he clutched the straps of his chute, he saw a piece of the plane float down past him.
Sunday, October 25, 2015
Bridge spied
Hmmm. This is an odd situation. For once, I think a Spielberg film has been a tad overpraised, collectively, rather than my usual feeling that there are too many critics too cynical about him.
It's not that there's anything wrong with Bridge of Spies: the acting is fine; the script has witticisms at times; and I don't think anyone now does history with finer and more authentic feel in the art direction than Spielberg.
It's just that I missed an element of tension, and had been expecting a bit more, I guess, intrigue in the story. Out of Spielberg's last few films, I admit, this impressed me less than both War Horse or Lincoln. (And Lincoln was a bit similar in that we already knew the ending - the interest is in how the movie gets there.)
I am also a little surprised that it hasn't had a wingnut backlash in the US, as it can be read as impliedly criticising the handling of those captured by the US in the war on terror, yet Breitbart gave it a glowing review too.
Anyway, it's worth seeing, as Spielberg always is. I just wish I could have been more gushing in praise.
It's not that there's anything wrong with Bridge of Spies: the acting is fine; the script has witticisms at times; and I don't think anyone now does history with finer and more authentic feel in the art direction than Spielberg.
It's just that I missed an element of tension, and had been expecting a bit more, I guess, intrigue in the story. Out of Spielberg's last few films, I admit, this impressed me less than both War Horse or Lincoln. (And Lincoln was a bit similar in that we already knew the ending - the interest is in how the movie gets there.)
I am also a little surprised that it hasn't had a wingnut backlash in the US, as it can be read as impliedly criticising the handling of those captured by the US in the war on terror, yet Breitbart gave it a glowing review too.
Anyway, it's worth seeing, as Spielberg always is. I just wish I could have been more gushing in praise.
Climate change economic modelling questionned
David Roberts at Vox has a good article up explaining the doubts about how valid any of the long term economic modelling of climate change can really be.
Given that I had noticed those doubts being expressed in some of the quieter corners of the 'net for a year or two now, it's good to see this is finally getting some broader attention.
I did raise this issue in a thread at John Quiggin's blog recently too, noting Pindyck's criticism of the whole IAM exercise, but he didn't comment on it.
Given that I had noticed those doubts being expressed in some of the quieter corners of the 'net for a year or two now, it's good to see this is finally getting some broader attention.
I did raise this issue in a thread at John Quiggin's blog recently too, noting Pindyck's criticism of the whole IAM exercise, but he didn't comment on it.
Friday, October 23, 2015
More about that Berkeley study...
The Economist has a good article up giving some more of the background of the Berkeley study that looked at the economic effects of global warming in a new way. Here's part of it:
A paper published this week in Nature challenges this finding. The authors—Marshall Burke, Solomon Hsiang and Edward Miguel—suspected that economists had been looking for the wrong thing: a linear relationship between temperature and growth. Instead, they looked for an optimal temperature, on the assumption that excessive cold could harm growth as much as punishing heat. That is exactly what they found: hotter-than-usual years benefit countries, rich and poor alike, up to an average annual temperature of 13°C, after which hotter weather begins to sear growth. That allowed them to draw inferences about the likely effect of climate change: for Brazil, for example, an increase in temperature of 3°C will lead to a fall in output of 3% (see chart).David Appel shares my skepticism of (as he puts it) an economic model atop a climate model, but his post extracting some of the material from the paper is worth reading too. (I added a comment to his post along the lines of what I said here.)
The apparent heat resistance of rich countries, it turns out, is simply because some of them, such as Germany and France, lie on the colder side of the optimum, so grow faster in hotter years, whereas others, such as America and Australia, lie on the hotter side, and so wilt as temperatures rise. Within individual counties in America, for instance, every hot day (with an average temperature over 24 hours of 24-27°C) lowers the average income per person that day by 20%, according to a working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research by Mr Hsiang and Tatyana Deryugina. Very hot days (over 30°C) lower income per person by 28%. Looking at the average impact of rising temperatures in rich countries as a group had obscured such strong responses.
Much mirth caused
'Offers over $40,000': Tony Abbott joins the international speakers circuit
According to article:
According to article:
Mr Abbott's preferred topics include advice on leadership, negotiation, election forecast and analysis, current events and Asia.
The disappearance of Mussolini
Seems to be the day for updating previous pop culture posts.
In July, I wrote about seeing the musical Anything Goes. (One of those posts I like a lot, but no one comments on.) Today, I see that Beachcomber has a post about the mysterious appearance and disappearance of a reference to Mussolini as a "top" in the song "You're the Top."
Seems Wodehouse was responsible, although the matter is not without uncertainty.
Not entirely sure it was worth the update, but still....
In July, I wrote about seeing the musical Anything Goes. (One of those posts I like a lot, but no one comments on.) Today, I see that Beachcomber has a post about the mysterious appearance and disappearance of a reference to Mussolini as a "top" in the song "You're the Top."
Seems Wodehouse was responsible, although the matter is not without uncertainty.
Not entirely sure it was worth the update, but still....
Well argued
Hockey the fantasy economist may as well have farewelled Middle-earth | Greg Jericho | Business | The Guardian
I liked this piece from Greg Jericho that really showed up Joe Hockey as not up to the job of Treasurer.
Seems a nice enough guy in real life, but a bit of a hypocrite in politics and just all over the shop on matters of economics.
I liked this piece from Greg Jericho that really showed up Joe Hockey as not up to the job of Treasurer.
Seems a nice enough guy in real life, but a bit of a hypocrite in politics and just all over the shop on matters of economics.
You don't see that every day
Remember earlier this year that I had a bit of fun reading up on the nudist panic of the early 1930's in the US and Australia?
Well, upon stumbling upon a new resource of scanned materials from museums and what not, it's always tempting to just search "nudist" and see what pops up. That's how I found out (via the Digital Public Library of America) that the Smithsonian has in a box somewhere this photo from 1930:
The description is: Staged nudist wedding on a parade float with a mechanical dinosaur.
I have a suspicion that these particular nudists were trying to really annoy the anti-evolutionists in the South, but I could be wrong...
Well, upon stumbling upon a new resource of scanned materials from museums and what not, it's always tempting to just search "nudist" and see what pops up. That's how I found out (via the Digital Public Library of America) that the Smithsonian has in a box somewhere this photo from 1930:
The description is: Staged nudist wedding on a parade float with a mechanical dinosaur.
I have a suspicion that these particular nudists were trying to really annoy the anti-evolutionists in the South, but I could be wrong...
Your new word for today: phantosmia
It sounds a little like the phenomena of the phantom limb, that often hangs around when people lose their real one; but I hadn't heard of phantom smells before:
It occurs in people who lose the sense of smell. People with phantosmia imagine smells which can be odd, unnatural, unpleasant or even euphoric. It is a rare condition which can occur in relation to brain injuries, strokes, seizures, schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease and other neurological disorders.From a recent episode of the Science Show. You can read more in the transcript that is at the link on this page.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)