How Columbus Said Hello: He Tried Dancing – Phenomena: Curiously Krulwich
An odd bit of history here - talking about how Columbus and other new arrivals to the New World tried dancing as a way of starting up interaction with the natives. (I guess "natives" is not PC?)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016
Loss of privacy
God knows that the concept of wanting to be a champion athlete in any sporting endeavour is foreign to me: the idea of losing a huge amount of each day to exercise, winning a medal or five and then not knowing what to do with your life after you've peaked at (say) 21 sounds horrible.
But it does seem to be what quite a few swimming champions, in particular, go through.
And so it is that I feel sorry for Ian Thorpe. And his point about loss of privacy in his teenage years again seems oddly relevant to the Safe Schools program discussion:
But on the other hand - it sure seems to me that the program might have the consequence of making some teenagers feel under pressure amongst their peers in a similar way that Thorpe did not appreciate.
But it does seem to be what quite a few swimming champions, in particular, go through.
And so it is that I feel sorry for Ian Thorpe. And his point about loss of privacy in his teenage years again seems oddly relevant to the Safe Schools program discussion:
The Olympic champion Ian Thorpe has said he would have come out earlier if he’d had more time to become comfortable with his sexuality.....Again, I should say that I think much of the concern about the program is being overblown by conservatives (the latest politician to attach himself to outrage about it - Tony Abbott! Could this man possibly "do a Rudd" any more thoroughly than he clearly is?)
Thorpe said he was first asked about his sexuality when he was just 15.
“If I had a little bit more time when I was younger I would have come out, because I would have been comfortable with that,” Thorpe said. “And that’s why I think, we’re all making the same point, around why we don’t push people to come out.
But on the other hand - it sure seems to me that the program might have the consequence of making some teenagers feel under pressure amongst their peers in a similar way that Thorpe did not appreciate.
Careful with the green tea
Herbal supplements linked to at least six Australian organ transplants since 2011, data shows - ABC News
The "herbal supplement" that is most discussed in this article is green tea extract. It's put in some protein supplements, apparently, but:
The "herbal supplement" that is most discussed in this article is green tea extract. It's put in some protein supplements, apparently, but:
There is research that suggests green tea extract can become toxic at median level at the equivalent of 24 cups in a day.
An unusual form of OCD
Here's an odd story, from a therapist at an American website about Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (and which, as far as I can tell, is not aligned with any Christian group), that has particular interest in light of the ongoing discussion about the Safe Schools program and its material related to teenage sexuality:
[Not sure about any teenager with bodybuilding magazines, though. I can't get my head around that as an interest...]
"Let me guess," I said, leaning forward. "One day you were doing something you always do, and suddenly you started to pay attention to yourself in a different way. As you focused on yourself, the thought suddenly came into your head, "Maybe this means I'm gay. How do I really know I'm not?" I kept on, "Since then, you keep checking yourself, you know, like looking at guys or girls and trying to see who you're attracted to. Maybe you watch the way you talk, or walk, or move your hands, to see if you do these things the way a gay or straight person would. How am I doing so far, Mike?" He stared at me and answered, "I feel creeped out, like you're reading my mind."
I went on to explain that I definitely didn't have ESP (as far as I knew), but that he was suffering from a very common form of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (also known by the abbreviation OCD); one that doesn't get talked about very much, and certainly not a lot by people his age. Many people with obsessive sexual identity thoughts shared the particular symptoms I had outlined, so they weren't very hard to guess at. I related to him that at one time, a few years ago, I actually found myself treating six different people at once for this type of OCD, and that we had even held a support group meeting just for this group. I added that these thoughts weren't confined to heterosexual people, and that I had even treated a gay patient who was troubled by obsessive thoughts that he might be straight.
Michael went on to confirm that his doubtful thoughts of being gay came on suddenly one day when he was looking through one of his bodybuilding magazines. He remembered looking at one picture in particular and thinking, "I wonder if I find this guy attractive?" With that, he suddenly became very anxious and horrified that he could have such a thought. He also found that in the days following, he couldn't get the thought out of his head. What made things worse, was that the other guys in school had a habit of teasing each other about being gay, a not unusual occurrence. Remarks that he used to shrug off now became very frightening. "What if they really can tell?" he remembered asking himself. He found himself avoiding his usual crowd. He threw away the bodybuilding magazines. He stopped going to school. Nothing helped. It seemed like the harder he worked to avoid thinking about whether or not he was gay, the more he would think about it. "But I'm not gay," he emphasized, "I'm not attracted to guys, so why am I thinking this? I've never been attracted to guys!" He paused for a moment. "But the thoughts seem so real."OK, it may not be very common, but it's possible that the Safe Schools program leads to this in some teenagers.
[Not sure about any teenager with bodybuilding magazines, though. I can't get my head around that as an interest...]
Dinner party downer
Wittgenstein, bewitched | TLS
Perhaps there's not much new in the biographical details in this review of a book about Wittgenstein, but it is amusing to read lines like this:
Perhaps there's not much new in the biographical details in this review of a book about Wittgenstein, but it is amusing to read lines like this:
As in many of these pieces, one thing that comes across in[Kant, I will remind the reader, was supposed to good dinner party company.]
Malcolm’s memoir is how incredibly difficult Wittgenstein was. “It was
always a strain to be with Wittgenstein”, Malcolm writes; “not only were the
intellectual demands of his conversation very great, but there was also his
severity, his ruthless judgements, his tendency to be censorious, and his
depression.” Von Wright concurs: “each conversation with Wittgenstein was
living through the day of judgement. It was terrible”.
All true
Ross Douthat says Obama created Trump. That’s nuts.
William Saletan writes scathingly of the Republican blame game:
William Saletan writes scathingly of the Republican blame game:
In Trump, Republican voters have found their anti-Obama. Trump spurnsOuch, as they say.
not just political correctness, but correctness of any kind. He lies
about Muslims and 9/11, insults women and people with disabilities,
accuses a judge of bias for being Hispanic, and hurls profanities. Trump
validates the maxim that in presidential primaries, the opposition
party tends to choose a candidate who differs temperamentally from the
incumbent. Obama is an adult. Therefore, Republicans are nominating a
child.
Monday, February 29, 2016
Economist confirms economics fail
Economics: Current climate models are grossly misleading : Nature News & Comment
Well, now even Nicholas Stern is joining in on the "economic modelling we've been using for climate effects is almost certainly a crock for being too optimistic" line.
Seems a bit late for that now, doesn't it? He should have been arguing that about 10 years ago, and just saying something like this: "Ha! you expect us to be able to calculate the effect of climate change of various types and uncertain extremity on GDP in 100 years time? Forget it. There's obvious potential for massive damage to humanity and its built and natural environment: you just need to get urgent policies into place to get CO2 down now."
Well, now even Nicholas Stern is joining in on the "economic modelling we've been using for climate effects is almost certainly a crock for being too optimistic" line.
Seems a bit late for that now, doesn't it? He should have been arguing that about 10 years ago, and just saying something like this: "Ha! you expect us to be able to calculate the effect of climate change of various types and uncertain extremity on GDP in 100 years time? Forget it. There's obvious potential for massive damage to humanity and its built and natural environment: you just need to get urgent policies into place to get CO2 down now."
Oscars not worth my consideration
I'd be slightly worried that it might be a sign of old age that it seems that each year, the Oscars have become less relevant than the year before to the type of movies I actually want to see, were it not for the fact that the badly declining ratings for the show indicate I am far from alone.
I mean, the movies which probably got the biggest pre and post release publicity (Force Awakens, and perhaps Spectre) are of no real interest to the Academy, it seems.
But I did see Bridge of Spies, which was OK, if a tad underwhelming, so I should still watch it for a glimpse of my directorial hero and his wife.
Actually, I do want to see Spotlight, too. And that adult stop motion mid life crisis story Anomalisa, which (strangely) is being shown at a brisbane art-house cinema once a day at lunchtime. Perhaps that should be another Google Play rent...
I mean, the movies which probably got the biggest pre and post release publicity (Force Awakens, and perhaps Spectre) are of no real interest to the Academy, it seems.
But I did see Bridge of Spies, which was OK, if a tad underwhelming, so I should still watch it for a glimpse of my directorial hero and his wife.
Actually, I do want to see Spotlight, too. And that adult stop motion mid life crisis story Anomalisa, which (strangely) is being shown at a brisbane art-house cinema once a day at lunchtime. Perhaps that should be another Google Play rent...
Only 10 years late
Stephen Chow’s The Mermaid, reviewed.
I mentioned last week that I saw and liked Journey to the West, a well directed kung fu-ish Buddhist comedy.
It was directed by Stephen Chow, who I didn't realise has been a huge name in Hong Kong and China (and relatively well known in the West too) until I read up about Journey.
He's now got an enormous hit on his hands in China with The Mermaid, which I see has a one cinema release in Brisbane (in one of the more Chinese heavy suburbs.)
I also see from Reddit that lots of people love his 2005 film Kung Fu Hustle, which I found on Google Play movies, and have "rented" to watch sometime in the next month.
(This is the first time I have rented a movie from Google Play. I see that buying movies from them has attracted much criticism, as they apparently do not allow the downloaded movie to be moved, ever, from the location it was downloaded to. And that can't be a PC hard drive: it has to be an Android device or a Chromebook tablet. I also am curious about the SD picture quality. But all will be revealed when I start watching the downloaded movie...)
I mentioned last week that I saw and liked Journey to the West, a well directed kung fu-ish Buddhist comedy.
It was directed by Stephen Chow, who I didn't realise has been a huge name in Hong Kong and China (and relatively well known in the West too) until I read up about Journey.
He's now got an enormous hit on his hands in China with The Mermaid, which I see has a one cinema release in Brisbane (in one of the more Chinese heavy suburbs.)
I also see from Reddit that lots of people love his 2005 film Kung Fu Hustle, which I found on Google Play movies, and have "rented" to watch sometime in the next month.
(This is the first time I have rented a movie from Google Play. I see that buying movies from them has attracted much criticism, as they apparently do not allow the downloaded movie to be moved, ever, from the location it was downloaded to. And that can't be a PC hard drive: it has to be an Android device or a Chromebook tablet. I also am curious about the SD picture quality. But all will be revealed when I start watching the downloaded movie...)
Douthat trying to walk that tightrope again
It's one of the signs of the current Republican (almost obscene) clueless-ness that some of them are trying on the "this Trump phenomena - it's all the fault of Obama" line. Jonah Goldberg had a particularly ludicrous go at this a couple of week's ago at the LA Times, which opened with this:
Now it's Ross Douthat's turn, and as usual, he tries to take a more considered, reasonable sounding line.
Look, there is one element of truth in there: that Obama's first campaign was big on "hope" rhetoric and light on policy - as I've said many times, he didn't impress me as a well qualified person for the job, at all. And the "change" rhetoric leaves me cold generally - it was too much like the Kevin Rudd line with its shallowness.
But seriously, there is no comparison between the concern that reasonable people may have had about the suitability of Obama for the job with that which they should have with blowhard, "say anything" ratbag Trump.
As the top comment after the article says (typos and all):
In Springfield, Ill., last week, President Obama commemorated the ninth anniversary of his bid for the White House. He admitted that one of his “few regrets” was his inability “to reduce the polarization and the meanness in our politics.”(OK, so the column wasn't directly about Trump - it was about how Obama shouldn't appoint the next Supreme Court judge as a way of making it all up to the Republicans who have been hurt by his refusal to bend to their will by things like, well, undoing his signature health care policy. But you can see how this plays into the "he has caused Trump" line.)
To conservative ears, Obama's comments fell somewhere between risible and infuriating. Obama has always done his best to demonize and marginalize his opponents. Either the president honestly cannot see that or he's cynically pretending that the fault lies entirely with his critics. If only there were some way to figure out whether he's sincere.
Now it's Ross Douthat's turn, and as usual, he tries to take a more considered, reasonable sounding line.
Look, there is one element of truth in there: that Obama's first campaign was big on "hope" rhetoric and light on policy - as I've said many times, he didn't impress me as a well qualified person for the job, at all. And the "change" rhetoric leaves me cold generally - it was too much like the Kevin Rudd line with its shallowness.
But seriously, there is no comparison between the concern that reasonable people may have had about the suitability of Obama for the job with that which they should have with blowhard, "say anything" ratbag Trump.
As the top comment after the article says (typos and all):
We could see this coming, couldn't we? It was inevitable that establishment Republicans would blame Donald Trump's successful insurgent campaign for the GOP nomination on Obama. Ross Douthat ties himself in knots making the argument that it's all the fault of Obama and the Democrats.I didn't mind this comment further down, too:
But here's the real connection: the election of Barack Obama gave Republicans the opening to make incivility in politics sonehow...cool. He made it possible for them to claim that the president of the United States was born in Kenya; they could yell "You lie!" as he delivered his State of the Union; they could boast that they were going to kick his rear end out of the White House. They did all this and their constituents loved it.
Donald Trump is riding that wave, quite possibly all the way to the Republican nomination. Is it Barack Obama's fault, or the fault of a party that has gone so far off the rails that a carnival barker like Trump is now seen as a plausible leader?
Ross, you're better than this.
Commenters who point to Reagan's imagery, in his campaigns and in office, are completely right. Obama did some over the top stuff in his first campaign, but he didn't invent the celebrity politics business which, at a minimum, goes back to JFK and Jacquie.
You know as well as your readers that the most important influences leading to Trump were: the Southern Strategy, stagnant wages, loss of good jobs, leadership failure of "the elites."
Any contribution from "politicians as celebrities" is completely overshadowed by the take-no-prisoners politics that emerged with the removal of the "fairness doctrine" for broadcast. That, in turn, gave rise to Limbaugh and company, followed by Gingrich revolution in the mid-90s, the rise of Fox News, and, now, the evolution of cable news, a media-politics complex that has turned the Presidential election process into a non-stop source of programming.
Tracing this to something Obama did is, I think, beneath you.
Saturday, February 27, 2016
Holding the candle for Tony
I can only assume that it's courtesy of former Daily Telegraph editor Paul Whittaker's taking on the top job at The Australian that it has become so firmly the National Paper of Yearning for the Return of Tony Abbott.
Which is really pretty hilarious. No matter how badly Turnbull may be perceived to perform, there is no way that voters are going to think the solution is to go back to gormless Tony. I work around people pretty passionately against Labor - none of them thought Abbott was a success as a PM. They think he was an inarticulate idiot in the role.
But it's good to see The Australian sinking further and further into negative credibility and/or irrelevance.
Update: as people on Twitter are saying:
Which is really pretty hilarious. No matter how badly Turnbull may be perceived to perform, there is no way that voters are going to think the solution is to go back to gormless Tony. I work around people pretty passionately against Labor - none of them thought Abbott was a success as a PM. They think he was an inarticulate idiot in the role.
But it's good to see The Australian sinking further and further into negative credibility and/or irrelevance.
Update: as people on Twitter are saying:
Friday, February 26, 2016
Evidence for harmful reef effects already taking place
Landmark experiment confirms ocean acidification’s toll on Great Barrier Reef : Nature News & Comment
Given the complexity of this type of experiment, I would still be a little cautious about its conclusions.
But it's still not good news for the long term prospects for the GBR.
Given the complexity of this type of experiment, I would still be a little cautious about its conclusions.
But it's still not good news for the long term prospects for the GBR.
Apples in India
While reading about that too-good-to-be-true cheapo smart phone in India last week, I was reminded about how iPhones barely sell there:
Now, a sales target of a million iPhones is within breaching distance in a country where the installed base of smartphones is very low. According to Counterpoint Technology Research’s senior analyst Tarun Pathak, 106 million smartphones were sold in India in 2015 but 300 million more smartphones are expected to be sold in the next two years. Significantly, Apple has only about 1 percent share of this booming smartphone market. “It is a huge, enticing market that just cannot be disregarded,” says Pathak. “India is a high-potential market not only in terms of volume but also the massive scale and opportunity that lies ahead.”Amazing. (But then again, it could just be that I'm easily amazed.)
It would be, like, Peak America
Douthat Apologizes For Trump Joke | The Daily Caller
Poor old Ross Douthat attempted a joke about how an assassination attempt (like one in a movie, which involved the target using a baby to shield himself and thus losing credibility) could end the Trump campaign. He's since deleted the tweet and said sorry.
Well, normally, conservatives would complain about PC self censorship, but not now, hey?
Because, honestly, who with any imagination at all hasn't had an idle thought about how deeply ironic and "peak America" it would be if Trump were shot on the campaign trail, preferably by some schizophrenic migrant nutter with no health care plan (perhaps with immigrant parents from Mexico?) who had still managed to legally buy a gun with cash supplied by the Koch brothers?
And, as I have noted before, Right wing nutters have been fantasising about Obama being shot for his e-vil (non-existant) plans to seize American's guns.
So Ross should be cut some slack...
Poor old Ross Douthat attempted a joke about how an assassination attempt (like one in a movie, which involved the target using a baby to shield himself and thus losing credibility) could end the Trump campaign. He's since deleted the tweet and said sorry.
Well, normally, conservatives would complain about PC self censorship, but not now, hey?
Because, honestly, who with any imagination at all hasn't had an idle thought about how deeply ironic and "peak America" it would be if Trump were shot on the campaign trail, preferably by some schizophrenic migrant nutter with no health care plan (perhaps with immigrant parents from Mexico?) who had still managed to legally buy a gun with cash supplied by the Koch brothers?
And, as I have noted before, Right wing nutters have been fantasising about Obama being shot for his e-vil (non-existant) plans to seize American's guns.
So Ross should be cut some slack...
Ooh, a mystery!
BBC Future - The quest to solve YouTube’s strangest mystery
I suppose if I read Reddit more carefully, I would have known about this earlier. And now it's slightly more mysterious, given that when I check the channel in question, it seems the recent Youtubes have been taken down.
All sounds very "numbers station" to me...
I suppose if I read Reddit more carefully, I would have known about this earlier. And now it's slightly more mysterious, given that when I check the channel in question, it seems the recent Youtubes have been taken down.
All sounds very "numbers station" to me...
Thursday, February 25, 2016
A reasonable take on lock out laws
Sydney wasn't vibrant before these alcohol laws, it was embarrassing - The Drum (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Inner city areas change all the time - weren't people complaining about Oxford Street dying long before the lock out laws? As the author writes in this very fair minded article, it's also the case that 24 hour liquor licences and sudden popularity with hoards of drunk youngsters crowds out other, more sedate, businesses (like restaurants).
Overly liberal licencing laws therefore benefit some type of businesses at the cost of others. Tightening those laws means there may be a transition to the other type of businesses in the area. Residents may well find their property values increasing; drug peddlers, prostitutes and strippers may have to find some other area to work from. Such is life when governments decide, with voter approval, that regulation needs tightening.
Inner city areas change all the time - weren't people complaining about Oxford Street dying long before the lock out laws? As the author writes in this very fair minded article, it's also the case that 24 hour liquor licences and sudden popularity with hoards of drunk youngsters crowds out other, more sedate, businesses (like restaurants).
Overly liberal licencing laws therefore benefit some type of businesses at the cost of others. Tightening those laws means there may be a transition to the other type of businesses in the area. Residents may well find their property values increasing; drug peddlers, prostitutes and strippers may have to find some other area to work from. Such is life when governments decide, with voter approval, that regulation needs tightening.
President Troll
I was going to post about how much Trump's campaign behaviour resembles one gigantic troll of the Republican party, and the entire planet, but I see the point has been made before.
The thing is, some trolls can be pretty funny, and I'd be pretty sure that at some of those supporting him think it is all part of a game.
But I can't see it lasting all the way to the White House.
The fact that the Koch Brothers are starting to fight harder against him doesn't mean much - didn't they blow a huge amount of money on the Romney run?
Trump winning the candidacy would therefore have a couple of benefits - it may further impoverish the Koch's bank account and influence, and (presumably) blow up the Party whose behaviour and nonsense ideology for the last decade deserves blowing up.
I also didn't mind this article that gives a possible explanation as to why even evangelicals are voting for Trump: as a "last hurrah" against a lost culture war. Or, maybe, evangelicals just enjoy a funny troll, too...
The thing is, some trolls can be pretty funny, and I'd be pretty sure that at some of those supporting him think it is all part of a game.
But I can't see it lasting all the way to the White House.
The fact that the Koch Brothers are starting to fight harder against him doesn't mean much - didn't they blow a huge amount of money on the Romney run?
Trump winning the candidacy would therefore have a couple of benefits - it may further impoverish the Koch's bank account and influence, and (presumably) blow up the Party whose behaviour and nonsense ideology for the last decade deserves blowing up.
I also didn't mind this article that gives a possible explanation as to why even evangelicals are voting for Trump: as a "last hurrah" against a lost culture war. Or, maybe, evangelicals just enjoy a funny troll, too...
Wednesday, February 24, 2016
About that Safe Schools program...
Many years ago, I wrote a post complaining that American schools with their gay support clubs were going too far, in the sense that I don't see that teenage sexuality really warrants school based scrutiny or endorsement. All sensible adults don't really want high school teenagers of any type having sex; that complete sexuality self understanding is not something that teenagers (in particular) actually need to be certain of seems badly unacknowledged these days; and an emphasis on the right to privacy in terms of sexual feelings should (to my mind) be the priority. But, as is usual, I find it hard Googling my own blog successfully, so I haven't re-read it for a while. I think that is how it went.
So now we have some hoo-ha about an anti-bullying program that concentrates on sexuality based bullying. The idea of an anti bullying program that incorporates sexuality based bullying is fine. Part of the concern about the Safe School program, though, is that some of the suggested exercises seem a tad too advanced for the age intended. (The bit about asking 11 year olds to imagine they're 16 and with "someone they're really into". My recent experience with 2 former eleven year olds is that this would have been like asking them to imagine they're an aardvark - it would have been pretty incomprehensible. ) But as I understand it, educational material like this is not set in concrete - the manual gives suggested exercises that teachers can pick and choose from, as would appear to suit their circumstances.
So part of the complaint appears overblown to me; but it probably does grate somewhat against my views about how sexuality is dealt with not just in schools, but in the media and broader society these days.
Can't an anti-bullying program just emphasise that it's none of a student's business to care or complain about which gender a fellow student might feel some sexual attraction towards, and that bullying based on that will be sternly dealt with?
But this is not to say that I have any particular problem with school based, quite detailed, sex education material regarding how your basic sex works, and its practical and emotional consequences. (And contraception, of course.) After all, the European approach to this does seem to work reasonably well. And as if teenagers want to hear the details about it from their parents...
So now we have some hoo-ha about an anti-bullying program that concentrates on sexuality based bullying. The idea of an anti bullying program that incorporates sexuality based bullying is fine. Part of the concern about the Safe School program, though, is that some of the suggested exercises seem a tad too advanced for the age intended. (The bit about asking 11 year olds to imagine they're 16 and with "someone they're really into". My recent experience with 2 former eleven year olds is that this would have been like asking them to imagine they're an aardvark - it would have been pretty incomprehensible. ) But as I understand it, educational material like this is not set in concrete - the manual gives suggested exercises that teachers can pick and choose from, as would appear to suit their circumstances.
So part of the complaint appears overblown to me; but it probably does grate somewhat against my views about how sexuality is dealt with not just in schools, but in the media and broader society these days.
Can't an anti-bullying program just emphasise that it's none of a student's business to care or complain about which gender a fellow student might feel some sexual attraction towards, and that bullying based on that will be sternly dealt with?
But this is not to say that I have any particular problem with school based, quite detailed, sex education material regarding how your basic sex works, and its practical and emotional consequences. (And contraception, of course.) After all, the European approach to this does seem to work reasonably well. And as if teenagers want to hear the details about it from their parents...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)