Tuesday, September 13, 2016
Monday, September 12, 2016
A timing issue
Babies Take Longer To Come Out Than They Did In Grandma's Day : Shots - Health News : NPR
The typical first-time mother takes 6 1/2 hours to give birth theseWell I didn't know that. Possible reasons are included in the article.
days. Her counterpart 50 years ago labored for barely four hours.
That's the striking conclusion of a new federal study that compared nearly 140,000 births from two time periods.
Why continue?
I hope there is someone in the media tonight who can explain why it is that the Senate couldn't just adjourn for the day (or until the afternoon) if it had no business to deal with. It would seem that this is simply not an option, as it would be for any other organisation holding a meeting where the participants unexpectedly had nothing ready to discuss or vote on, but why is that so?
Sex and death - topics of abiding interest
A brief history of the afterlife | History Extra
This article from August summarises a new book from a Queensland academic about a topic that has been mentioned here a few times recently. Good reading.
At the bottom of this History Extra page, there were links including to one article on sex, which lead to another, etc. They make for some entertaining reading, and I learnt a few things on the way:
A brief history of sex and sexuality in ancient Greece
A brief history of sex and sexuality in Ancient Rome
(Can't say I had heard of the rumours of Julius Caesar "living as a girl" in the court of King Nicomedes when he was a young man. There's a good, fairly detailed explanation of this rumour - which seems more just about him being the "passive" partner of the King, in a .pdf at this link.)
Georgian Britain - sex in high places
I think I should be spending more on the History Extra site.
This article from August summarises a new book from a Queensland academic about a topic that has been mentioned here a few times recently. Good reading.
At the bottom of this History Extra page, there were links including to one article on sex, which lead to another, etc. They make for some entertaining reading, and I learnt a few things on the way:
A brief history of sex and sexuality in ancient Greece
A brief history of sex and sexuality in Ancient Rome
(Can't say I had heard of the rumours of Julius Caesar "living as a girl" in the court of King Nicomedes when he was a young man. There's a good, fairly detailed explanation of this rumour - which seems more just about him being the "passive" partner of the King, in a .pdf at this link.)
Georgian Britain - sex in high places
I think I should be spending more on the History Extra site.
Joseph Stiglitz writes
Joseph Stiglitz Says Standard Economics Is Wrong. Inequality and Unearned Income Kills the Economy - Evonomics
It's pretty long, and I haven't read it all yet, but he does write clearly and sounds very reasonable.
Judith Sloan will hate it.
It's pretty long, and I haven't read it all yet, but he does write clearly and sounds very reasonable.
Judith Sloan will hate it.
Despite the title, this is a good article
Is It Really Possible To Faint From Heat, As Clinton Claims?
Is it really possible that Right wing conspiracists are so dumb that they don't believe fainting from protracted standing in even mild warmth is not only possible, but not un-common to see happen in any large crowd of any age? Obviously, they haven't witnessed many military parades or guards of honour...
I would also assume that the pneumonia diagnosis is a case of so-called "walking pneumonia".
She has enough time to rest before the first Presidential debate. I predict Trump won't be so lucky as to have her pull out before that.
Is it really possible that Right wing conspiracists are so dumb that they don't believe fainting from protracted standing in even mild warmth is not only possible, but not un-common to see happen in any large crowd of any age? Obviously, they haven't witnessed many military parades or guards of honour...
I would also assume that the pneumonia diagnosis is a case of so-called "walking pneumonia".
She has enough time to rest before the first Presidential debate. I predict Trump won't be so lucky as to have her pull out before that.
Sunday, September 11, 2016
Yes, we'll take the lying, shallow, narcisstic, short attention span, draft dodging man boy who we don't trust to do anything he promises and whose man-crush on Putin we find rather disturbing because - Hillary
I think the heading fairly summaries the view of Instapundit's Glenn Harlan Reynolds, whose list of Hillary misdemeanours includes:
* the email issue (even when it became clearer than ever last week that she did indeed have encouragement from Colin Powell to do what she did),
* the fact that contributors to the Clinton charity meant people asked for favours, yet no actual serious scandal of someone getting something they clearly shouldn't have has been shown; and
* a reference to the IRS targeting conservatives (because, argues Reynolds, the civil service is totally in the tank for the Democrats.)
That last point (and by the way, has anyone actually shown corruption in the American tax investigations?) reminds me of Australian political conservatives complaining about how the institutions are against them - be it the public service, the ABC, or the Churches. Funny thing is, it never seems to occur to them that facing widespread organisational opposition might be a sign of a self created problem - some examples being denying climate change (boo hoo, the ABC doesn't feature the backyard scientists who don't believe NASA scientists); believing that cutting taxes always helps an economy (why won't Treasury just get, like, totally on board with that?); and pretending that keeping a couple of thousand people - including children - in indefinite detention in third world countries because they attempted to arrive in a boat is not a morally compromised position (Churches, stop being namby pamby wimps).
The only explanation for this pathetic justification of Trump support is that the American Right (and its Australian fan base) has become so self deluded by its Right wing media echo chamber about the Evils of Hillary and the outrages of Obama that they would prefer to vote for anyone but her. Yes, some of them think Trump is a hopeless, lying, changeable, windbag with worrying connections to Russia; but he's not Hillary, the woman who clearly deserves to be in jail because (despite detailed and repeat investigations that never can pin anything on her) the Right wing media just can't believe that prosecutions of her would fail.
As for the fate of the Nation under Clinton, there is nothing to really suggest that the path of American policy would take a large detour from what it has been under Obama, who, for a President in charge of an alleged hell hole nation, has a pretty good approval rating. Can't they face the fact that the American economy has not tanked?
Reynolds has outed himself, as has large slabs of the American Right, as having become simply unable to accept and process evidence with anything even faintly resembling objectivity. Turn off the Fox news, read something other than the WSJ, fellows, and get a grip after all these years.
* the email issue (even when it became clearer than ever last week that she did indeed have encouragement from Colin Powell to do what she did),
* the fact that contributors to the Clinton charity meant people asked for favours, yet no actual serious scandal of someone getting something they clearly shouldn't have has been shown; and
* a reference to the IRS targeting conservatives (because, argues Reynolds, the civil service is totally in the tank for the Democrats.)
That last point (and by the way, has anyone actually shown corruption in the American tax investigations?) reminds me of Australian political conservatives complaining about how the institutions are against them - be it the public service, the ABC, or the Churches. Funny thing is, it never seems to occur to them that facing widespread organisational opposition might be a sign of a self created problem - some examples being denying climate change (boo hoo, the ABC doesn't feature the backyard scientists who don't believe NASA scientists); believing that cutting taxes always helps an economy (why won't Treasury just get, like, totally on board with that?); and pretending that keeping a couple of thousand people - including children - in indefinite detention in third world countries because they attempted to arrive in a boat is not a morally compromised position (Churches, stop being namby pamby wimps).
The only explanation for this pathetic justification of Trump support is that the American Right (and its Australian fan base) has become so self deluded by its Right wing media echo chamber about the Evils of Hillary and the outrages of Obama that they would prefer to vote for anyone but her. Yes, some of them think Trump is a hopeless, lying, changeable, windbag with worrying connections to Russia; but he's not Hillary, the woman who clearly deserves to be in jail because (despite detailed and repeat investigations that never can pin anything on her) the Right wing media just can't believe that prosecutions of her would fail.
As for the fate of the Nation under Clinton, there is nothing to really suggest that the path of American policy would take a large detour from what it has been under Obama, who, for a President in charge of an alleged hell hole nation, has a pretty good approval rating. Can't they face the fact that the American economy has not tanked?
Reynolds has outed himself, as has large slabs of the American Right, as having become simply unable to accept and process evidence with anything even faintly resembling objectivity. Turn off the Fox news, read something other than the WSJ, fellows, and get a grip after all these years.
Saturday, September 10, 2016
Historical blender films
I'm only 16 years late to the party, but last night I watched the Cate Blanchett 1998 movie Elizabeth for the first time, in pleasing High Definition on SBS.
I'm always of two minds about these movies, given that you can always safely assume that to one degree or another they will not be historically accurate. Does that really matter, particularly if it inspires viewers checking up on the true story to learn some real history; or is it a puzzling insult to veracity that so many screenwriters can't make an entertaining movie without grossly misleading, or lying to, the audience?
I guess I am more forgiving if a movie opens with "inspired by true events" as a warning to the audience; but how often does that happen? (And, incidentally, I missed the first couple of minutes of Elizabeth, so I don't know if any such disclaimer last night.)
Anyhow, I remember at the time the movie came out there were many articles talking about its inaccuracies, and having refreshed my memory about them now, the movie really is like an experiment to see what happens if you put into a blender a list of historical true characters, a separate list of their ages, some notes about events over an entire life (even if you're only supposed to be covering the first half), some soft erotica, and a few kilometers of fine fabrics. Hit the button and see how it all tumbles out.
At the end of the day, we can all agree it looked fantasitc, and with her features and good acting, it was the role Blanchett was born to play. But even on its own terms as a movie story, it was a bit of a mess; and when you read up on the true facts, I think the historical liberties were just too extreme to forgive. (I , mean, seriously: the young transvestite French suitor never even made it to England, let alone being interrupted mid-orgy by the queen. The major dramatic revelation - that her lover was already married - is also pure invention, given that the real Liz was at his wedding.)
A few links about the inaccuracies, for anyone who cares: here, here, here and here.
I'm always of two minds about these movies, given that you can always safely assume that to one degree or another they will not be historically accurate. Does that really matter, particularly if it inspires viewers checking up on the true story to learn some real history; or is it a puzzling insult to veracity that so many screenwriters can't make an entertaining movie without grossly misleading, or lying to, the audience?
I guess I am more forgiving if a movie opens with "inspired by true events" as a warning to the audience; but how often does that happen? (And, incidentally, I missed the first couple of minutes of Elizabeth, so I don't know if any such disclaimer last night.)
Anyhow, I remember at the time the movie came out there were many articles talking about its inaccuracies, and having refreshed my memory about them now, the movie really is like an experiment to see what happens if you put into a blender a list of historical true characters, a separate list of their ages, some notes about events over an entire life (even if you're only supposed to be covering the first half), some soft erotica, and a few kilometers of fine fabrics. Hit the button and see how it all tumbles out.
At the end of the day, we can all agree it looked fantasitc, and with her features and good acting, it was the role Blanchett was born to play. But even on its own terms as a movie story, it was a bit of a mess; and when you read up on the true facts, I think the historical liberties were just too extreme to forgive. (I , mean, seriously: the young transvestite French suitor never even made it to England, let alone being interrupted mid-orgy by the queen. The major dramatic revelation - that her lover was already married - is also pure invention, given that the real Liz was at his wedding.)
A few links about the inaccuracies, for anyone who cares: here, here, here and here.
Friday, September 09, 2016
The American floods and climate change
Flooding, Extreme Weather, and Record Temperatures: How Global Warming Puts it All Together - The Equation
I haven't posted anything about the recent American floods and climate change, even though I saw the occasional report referring to that question. This article, though, does confirm that the rainfall intensity that lead to them was exceptionally intense, and a climate change link seems obvious.
Unless, of course, you're a Right wing, science and evidence rejecting twit from America, or Australia, who can write things like this (Hinderaker, from Powerline blog):
Sad that the Right has become so self deluded on this matter.
I haven't posted anything about the recent American floods and climate change, even though I saw the occasional report referring to that question. This article, though, does confirm that the rainfall intensity that lead to them was exceptionally intense, and a climate change link seems obvious.
Unless, of course, you're a Right wing, science and evidence rejecting twit from America, or Australia, who can write things like this (Hinderaker, from Powerline blog):
Is the debate over catastrophic anthropogenic global warming over? In one sense, it is. One thing we know for sure is that the models that are the sole support for alarmism are wrong. The substantial heating they projected has failed to materialize. Having been falsified by observation, we know that they are no good. The alarmists will have to come up with something better than these discredited models if they want to convince the rest of us.Yet, again, this is the chart he is evidently unaware of (or refuses to believe over what climate non-scientist Anthony Watt and his man-shed "scientists" publish):
It's a (ultra-Orthodox) man's life
The ultra-Orthodox Jews combining tech and the Torah - BBC News
I didn't know that this was how some Orthodox Jewish life worked (or "didn't work"):
I didn't know that this was how some Orthodox Jewish life worked (or "didn't work"):
Like many of his friends, Slaven grew up expecting a life of quiet
learning. Haredi men are expected to spend most of their time studying
the Torah and Talmud, Judaism's sacred texts, leaving their wives to go
out and work. About half of Israel's Haredi men live this way.
But while the cost of living has risen in recent years, child benefit has
been cut - bad news for Haredi families, which often have eight-to-10
children and rely on benefits to make ends meet.
Guns and suicide
When a Smaller Military Means Fewer Suicides - The Atlantic
Some strong evidence given here that if you decrease access to guns, you decrease the suicide rate. A nice, clear, article.
Some strong evidence given here that if you decrease access to guns, you decrease the suicide rate. A nice, clear, article.
More Friday Physics
Backreaction: Sorry, the universe wasn’t made for you
Here's a post by Bee H about the anthropic principle, and objecting to the idea that the universe was "fine tuned" for life.
Here's a post by Bee H about the anthropic principle, and objecting to the idea that the universe was "fine tuned" for life.
A look at an obvious Trump feature
Donald Trump’s Shortest Attribute Isn’t His Fingers - POLITICO Magazine
Lots of evidence provided from lots of people that Trump has always had a very, very short attention span. Given that there have been many examples from the campaign where can barely articulate a thought in a full sentence before going onto some other thought, this is far from surprising.
I also see that Snopes has already called out as false the conspiracy theory (promoted on twitter by actor James Woods, of all people) that Clinton was wearing an ear piece yesterday.
She may be reluctant to give them the attention they crave, but I don't think it would hurt Clinton to go in, boots and all, in calling out a substantial slab of Trump's supporters as being reality challenged, very gullible people who need to get a grip.
Lots of evidence provided from lots of people that Trump has always had a very, very short attention span. Given that there have been many examples from the campaign where can barely articulate a thought in a full sentence before going onto some other thought, this is far from surprising.
I also see that Snopes has already called out as false the conspiracy theory (promoted on twitter by actor James Woods, of all people) that Clinton was wearing an ear piece yesterday.
She may be reluctant to give them the attention they crave, but I don't think it would hurt Clinton to go in, boots and all, in calling out a substantial slab of Trump's supporters as being reality challenged, very gullible people who need to get a grip.
Thursday, September 08, 2016
How about playing the tape to him at the Presidential debate?
Donald Trump just lied about opposing the Iraq War before it started. Here’s proof. - Vox
The article notes that there is a recording of Trump saying in 2002 (without much enthusiasm, but still) that he supported the Iraq War.
The rest of the article bemoans how the media knows that a serial repeat liar who continues repeating a lie, will more or less get away with it.
But really, why should this be: why cannot a reporter play the audio to his face and say "why have been repeatedly lying about this?" Why not do it as part of the Presidential debate - just play the tape, and see how he tried to deal with it?
The article notes that there is a recording of Trump saying in 2002 (without much enthusiasm, but still) that he supported the Iraq War.
The rest of the article bemoans how the media knows that a serial repeat liar who continues repeating a lie, will more or less get away with it.
But really, why should this be: why cannot a reporter play the audio to his face and say "why have been repeatedly lying about this?" Why not do it as part of the Presidential debate - just play the tape, and see how he tried to deal with it?
The "no jack" scandal (talk about your First World problems)
Funny to read this wanky, typically Apple, explanation noted at Slate about why the new iPhone has no ear phone jack:
Why is Apple not able to use a similar water resistant jack?
I'm still sticking to my Samsung allegiance - even though my first experience with their cheap, early Tab 2 tablet was not great. (Known bugs that were never fixed with any update.) It's been made up for by my very, very pleasing Tab S, and a cheapo phone that is still pretty damn reliable. I always have liked the look of the round edged Galaxy 7, too, but I'm not willing to spend that much on a phone.
Apple’s own explanation for the change was a little baffling. Schiller said the rationale for jettisoning the headphone jack could be summed up in one word: “courage.” What kind of courage? “The courage to move on, and to try something new that betters all of us,” he elaborated. OK then!Further down, it is said that there is something the phone gets from not having one:
Well, for one thing, you can now drop your iPhone in the toilet. I mean, you could do that before, but now when you get it back out, there’s a decent chance it will continue to function. Eliminating the headphone jack enabled Apple to seal the phone at last, making it “dust and water resistant,” albeit not fully waterproof.But wait a minute - the Samsung Note 7 (yes, I know - it can explode) has been heavily promoted as being waterproof to a similar degree, and it has an audio jack.
Why is Apple not able to use a similar water resistant jack?
I'm still sticking to my Samsung allegiance - even though my first experience with their cheap, early Tab 2 tablet was not great. (Known bugs that were never fixed with any update.) It's been made up for by my very, very pleasing Tab S, and a cheapo phone that is still pretty damn reliable. I always have liked the look of the round edged Galaxy 7, too, but I'm not willing to spend that much on a phone.
Wednesday, September 07, 2016
Only 104 years ago
Once you get past 50, events that happened 100 or so years ago no longer sound all that far in the past. Only twice your lifetime...that's not so long ago!
So, as I was walking around the Rydges Hotel at the Exhibition grounds last Saturday (it's my routine now, and I really like its Paddock bar for coffee or, later in the day, their house beer), I noticed this metal history note around a tree:
So, as I was walking around the Rydges Hotel at the Exhibition grounds last Saturday (it's my routine now, and I really like its Paddock bar for coffee or, later in the day, their house beer), I noticed this metal history note around a tree:
The first flight in Brisbane was "only" 104 years ago at the Exhibition grounds. This deserves a look at a real photo of the event:
Not the best photo to see what's going on, but what I like the next one is that you can clearly see the grandstand that is still there, and within sight of the Paddock bar.
The State Library blog post that I got these from notes that the plane crashed on landing. "Wizard" Stone was OK, though.
Incredible to consider the advances in aviation since then.
Resistance to weed
In Colorado, a revolt against legalized marijuana - The Boston Globe
I'm not at all sure, of course, that the local anti legalisation activists are credible in all that they claim, but that said, I understand opposition to things like this:
There are also claims in the article that the period of legalisation has been accompanied by an increase in youthful homelessness - something you might expect to see in increased cases of schizophrenia that is likely to accompany increased youthful use.
I'm not at all sure, of course, that the local anti legalisation activists are credible in all that they claim, but that said, I understand opposition to things like this:
She hates that her kids’ school is near several dispensaries. She’sYes, surely a large part of the potential problem with legalisation is the accompanying capitalist urge to expand the market. If it were ever legalised here, I would certainly hope that it is the subject of severe advertising restrictions of at least the same severity that tobacco faces. Apparently, the Americans couldn't see their way to do that with marijuana.
frustrated by the full-page ads in the local paper with huge photos of
buds and coupons for $1 joints with a purchase of $20 or more.
There are also claims in the article that the period of legalisation has been accompanied by an increase in youthful homelessness - something you might expect to see in increased cases of schizophrenia that is likely to accompany increased youthful use.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)