Libertarians are the True Social Parasites | George Monbiot
Mentioned today because the recent Ridley "why are people so mean to me?" column was tweeted by one jtfsoon.
Friday, January 23, 2015
Jihad continues
Man, someone at The Australian is absolutely determined that Gillian Triggs is to be sacked, or discredited to the max. I would love to know what contact there has been between editorial staff and Coalition figures who want the same outcome - this campaign has been so intense it is hard to believe that it is being driven just by someone at the paper who has taken affront at Triggs.
Anyway, the latest effort comes by quoting the only Australian Human Rights academic I know of who has come out in defence of torture, and taken the view that Australia should withdraw from the UN Refugee convention. His views on refusing entry to potential refugees who arrive on boats arrivals have essentially been adopted by this government (following from the Rudd decision, it has to be admitted.)
Mirko lost his Refugee Review Tribunal position due to his torture column. He is truly an outlier in the field of human rights commentary. His opinion on anything to do with human rights has to be seen in that light.
Anyway, the latest effort comes by quoting the only Australian Human Rights academic I know of who has come out in defence of torture, and taken the view that Australia should withdraw from the UN Refugee convention. His views on refusing entry to potential refugees who arrive on boats arrivals have essentially been adopted by this government (following from the Rudd decision, it has to be admitted.)
Mirko lost his Refugee Review Tribunal position due to his torture column. He is truly an outlier in the field of human rights commentary. His opinion on anything to do with human rights has to be seen in that light.
Thursday, January 22, 2015
Gay ol' Berlin
The Gay Capital of the Nineteenth Century - The New Yorker
OK, so everyone's aware of Germany being a bit avant-garde regarding homosexuality in the 20's and 30's, if only because of Cabaret. (Actually, I still haven't seen it - but I think that's right...)
This review of a book argues that Berlin was actually way ahead of its time in the 19th century, and that a few prominent characters in Germany really can be said to have kicked off the whole gay rights reform movement, despite neighbouring France having actually decriminalised it much earlier.
It's quite an interesting read. Here, for example:
I don't know much about Wagner, but I didn't suspect his work of having such an influence. However, I see that a lesbian blogger has written at length about it. She says:
Update: just been reading a bit more about Richard Wagner, and find that his son Siegfried, who continued the family business, was definitely gay - or actually, if one takes ability to have several kids with his wife being any guide - bisexual. (Rather like Oscar Wilde in that regard. It would seem that both are now claimed as "gay", but whereas the popular impression of the 21st century gay man is more of one recoiling in horror at the idea of sleeping with a woman, those of the 19th and early 20th century seem to have been somewhat more flexible.)
Anyway, as noted in this site, there is a direct Hitler connection too (I mean, apart from his liking the music):
OK, so everyone's aware of Germany being a bit avant-garde regarding homosexuality in the 20's and 30's, if only because of Cabaret. (Actually, I still haven't seen it - but I think that's right...)
This review of a book argues that Berlin was actually way ahead of its time in the 19th century, and that a few prominent characters in Germany really can be said to have kicked off the whole gay rights reform movement, despite neighbouring France having actually decriminalised it much earlier.
It's quite an interesting read. Here, for example:
Gay urges welled up across Europe during the Romantic era; France, in particular, became a haven, since statutes forbidding sodomy had disappeared from its books during the Revolutionary period, reflecting a distaste for law based on religious belief. The Germans, though, were singularly ready to utter the unspeakable. Schopenhauer took a special interest in the complexities of sexuality; in a commentary added in 1859 to the third edition of “The World as Will and Representation,” he offered a notably mellow view of what he called “pederasty,” saying that it was present in every culture. “It arises in some way from human nature itself,” he said, and there was no point in opposing it. (He cited Horace: “Expel nature with a pitchfork, she still comes back.”) Schopenhauer proceeded to expound the dubious theory that nature promoted homosexuality in older men as a way of discouraging them from continuing to procreate.
Not surprisingly, Karl Heinrich Ulrichs seized on Schopenhauer’s curious piece of advocacy when he began his campaign; he quoted the philosopher in one of his coming-out letters to his relatives. Ulrichs might also have mentioned Wagner, who, in “Die Walküre” and “Tristan und Isolde,” depicted illicit passions that many late-nineteenth-century homosexuals saw as allegories for their own experience. Magnus Hirschfeld, in his 1914 book “The Homosexuality of Men and Women,” noted that the Wagner festival in Bayreuth had become a “favorite meeting place” for homosexuals, and quoted a classified ad, from 1894, in which a young man had sought a handsome companion for a Tyrolean bicycling expedition; it was signed “Numa 77, general delivery, Bayreuth.” Ulrichs had published his early pamphlets under the pseudonym Numa Numantius.
I don't know much about Wagner, but I didn't suspect his work of having such an influence. However, I see that a lesbian blogger has written at length about it. She says:
In the epilogue to Laurence Dreyfus’s study of Wagner’s erotics, he writes, “It is clear that Wagner’s devotion to depictions of sexual desire was exceedingly unconventional, indeed unprecedented in the history of art.”2 This is certainly because his belief that the repression of female sexual desire as one of the big ills of society was very unconventional. Eva Rieger called the depiction of female sexual desire via Isolde “all but revolutionary.”3 I have covered all this in the posts I referenced above, but I want to make one clear point: all his female characters exhibited very strong desire, including the “virginal” ones such as Elisabeth in Tannhäuser. This was particularly subversive to the dominant sexual culture.
Women–“respectable women”–flocked to hear Wagner’s works, and were among his strongest, most consistent supporters.4 And, while they didn’t scream à la Beatlemania, there were repeated reports of audience members—mostly women or gay men—fainting, having sobbing fits and other sorts of delirium.5 This outsized reaction to him made his critics react in horror, seeing his work as both a manifestation of illness, and a cause of it. They deemed—with their own brand of hysteria— that Wagner seduced the women (and gay men) to mental disease through his over-wrought music. He was damned as degenerate—just as critics damned rock ’n rollers in the same way. Nonetheless, Wagner won the cultural battle—at least for a time—as a large share of the intelligentsia reacted by embracing him, and Wagnerism was born.
Wagner’s stunning popularity and vast influence (as I wrote about here) opened
the floodgates to much more sexual expressiveness in music and, for that matter, all art. He got away with it, so others now fearlessly followed in his path. In this way, he both directly and indirectly influenced the cultural perception of sexuality. The acceleration of trends towards more open sexuality of the fin de sìecle period, particularly within Germany, France and England, can certainly be traced directly to Wagner.
The things you learn....
Update: just been reading a bit more about Richard Wagner, and find that his son Siegfried, who continued the family business, was definitely gay - or actually, if one takes ability to have several kids with his wife being any guide - bisexual. (Rather like Oscar Wilde in that regard. It would seem that both are now claimed as "gay", but whereas the popular impression of the 21st century gay man is more of one recoiling in horror at the idea of sleeping with a woman, those of the 19th and early 20th century seem to have been somewhat more flexible.)
Anyway, as noted in this site, there is a direct Hitler connection too (I mean, apart from his liking the music):
When Hitler, who was a financial supporter of the Bayreuth Festival, could no longer publicly endorse Lorenz, it was Siegfried’s wife Winifred who used her influence to rescue Bayreuth’s star heldentenor from public disgrace, exile and possible imprisonment over a charge of homosexuality.Well, I didn't know that...
Most historians concede that Hitler and Winnifred (below) carried on an affair after Siegfried’s death in 1930; there were even rumors of a possible marriage. Although Winifred was proud of her association with Hitler, when he visited her at Bayreuth, she took pains to conceal the connection. Hitler would register at the Hotel Bube in nearby Bad Berneck, and Winnifred would send her own car to pick him up, so that Hitler's ostentatious Mercedes would not be seen pulling into the driveway at Wahnfried, the Wagner family's villa built for Richard Wagner by King Ludwig II of Bavaria.
Maybe a fair summary?
American Sniper and the political battle over Chris Kyle.
Dana Stevens writes what sounds like a pretty balanced take on the movie and the surrounding controversy. She liked it, but not without qualification.
This single line seems important:
Dana Stevens writes what sounds like a pretty balanced take on the movie and the surrounding controversy. She liked it, but not without qualification.
This single line seems important:
It’s an existential critique of violent machismo that doubles as a celebration of violence.I do usually have a serious problem with that sort of contradictory effect in a movie...
Violence and alcohol
I see that libertarian Liberal Peter Phelps has tweeted a link to the opinion piece in Fairfax today "Australia doesn't have a problem with alcohol. We have a problem with violence." I take it that he has a problem with the various lock out laws in New South Wales.
The article makes the first hand observation that in Germany, or Berlin at least, alcohol is sold with few restrictions, at low cost, and consumed copiously, yet they do not have the street violence problem that we have in inner city Australia. In this respect, it sounds like Germany is very like Japan. (The national characteristics are very similar is quite a few ways, really.)
So, we all know that different countries have different cultures and different ways of reacting to alcohol and drugs. But, as the writer of the Fairfax article says, it is by no means clear why young Australians often behave badly when drunk compared to young-ish Germans and Japanese.
I agree with that. Many people also feel that behaviour on the streets has become worse over the last few decades. Why has that happened (assuming it's true - and I suspect it is)? There is likely no simple answer, with various factors involved, but obviously, it would be completely unrealistic to say the alcohol consumption itself is not a factor.
But the thing is, if you want to address a problem, you deal with what you've got, and what you can address quickly. Changing a culture around the consumption of alcohol is not something you can do quickly.
So regardless of the inter cultural comparisons, the obvious thing to do for a problem of alcohol related street violence in Australia is to tighten control on sale of alcohol. If the hospital doctors in Sydney say its working, it almost certainly is. The cultural change that may see us with happy drunks in the streets who rarely get into a fight (as with, in my experience, Japan) might, somehow, come eventually; but until then you deal with what you've got with ways that are quickly effective.
(Oh, and by the way, though regular alcohol consumption after work is extremely common in much of Japan, they do mostly toddle off home by midnight.)
The article makes the first hand observation that in Germany, or Berlin at least, alcohol is sold with few restrictions, at low cost, and consumed copiously, yet they do not have the street violence problem that we have in inner city Australia. In this respect, it sounds like Germany is very like Japan. (The national characteristics are very similar is quite a few ways, really.)
So, we all know that different countries have different cultures and different ways of reacting to alcohol and drugs. But, as the writer of the Fairfax article says, it is by no means clear why young Australians often behave badly when drunk compared to young-ish Germans and Japanese.
I agree with that. Many people also feel that behaviour on the streets has become worse over the last few decades. Why has that happened (assuming it's true - and I suspect it is)? There is likely no simple answer, with various factors involved, but obviously, it would be completely unrealistic to say the alcohol consumption itself is not a factor.
But the thing is, if you want to address a problem, you deal with what you've got, and what you can address quickly. Changing a culture around the consumption of alcohol is not something you can do quickly.
So regardless of the inter cultural comparisons, the obvious thing to do for a problem of alcohol related street violence in Australia is to tighten control on sale of alcohol. If the hospital doctors in Sydney say its working, it almost certainly is. The cultural change that may see us with happy drunks in the streets who rarely get into a fight (as with, in my experience, Japan) might, somehow, come eventually; but until then you deal with what you've got with ways that are quickly effective.
(Oh, and by the way, though regular alcohol consumption after work is extremely common in much of Japan, they do mostly toddle off home by midnight.)
Verbosity take down
The Guardian has a lengthy essay up with the somewhat promising title "After the Paris Attacks: It's Time for a New Enlightenment." The author is Pankay Mishra, who I don't know, and while he appears well intentioned, it seems from a quick scan to be a very verbose, somewhat rambling exercise that does an awful lot of sympathetic "contextualising" of European Muslims, which I am inclined to think is not a very useful response.
More interesting (and amusing) is this comment which really puts a boot into this style of essay. I will re-print it in full:
More interesting (and amusing) is this comment which really puts a boot into this style of essay. I will re-print it in full:
This will be become the standard example of the post-modern essay for first year undergraduate humanities students. It demonstrates all the features required to achieve celebrity pundit status. Firstly make sure you extensively quote many other pundits, trying to avoid scientists and politicians in democracies, both actual text and hearsay, name dropping as much as possible but carefully avoiding having any original thoughts yourself. This will confirm how well read you are but not expose you to the tedious business of having to defend your views. If the quotes come from those getting bungs from the Templeton Foundation, so much the better. Secondly, make sure that what you say will be just this side of bonkers and irrational so you don't come across as actually objecting to physical reality, gravity or such like but don't impugn those whose views encompass denial of historical events, human rights or some of the benefits of modernity. Thirdly, and this is very important, don't come up with any concrete suggestions yourself on how to effect change, manage difference and organise a functioning society but maintain an ethereal detachment from the nitty-gritty of getting elected or promoting tolerance and pluralism without being killed. Lastly, whatever you do don't draw attention to the obvious failures or barbarities of some cultural practices or, if you have to then make it seem as though these are not really related to the culture itself but must be some relic of previous oppression. Once these techniques have been mastered future commissions for filler and click bait are assured.
When touching equals molesting
BBC News - How teenage hugs angered Islamic authorities in Malaysia
You have to watch the video to get a good idea of the neurotic control "Sharia authorities" wish to exercise over sexuality.
You have to watch the video to get a good idea of the neurotic control "Sharia authorities" wish to exercise over sexuality.
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
What a good idea...
Saudi Arabia should 'curb marriages within relatives', says genetics researcher | GulfNews.com
Some extraordinary figures in this report:
Some extraordinary figures in this report:
Riyadh: A scheme to curb marriages within relatives in Saudi Arabia is
being intensified with a compulsory pre-marriage medical tests now
broached to cut the high rate of genetic diseases among the population.
Dr Ayman Al Sulaiman, a genetic researcher and consultant at King
Faisal Hospital in the capital Riyadh, told Saudi TV that a 2004 survey
showed endogamy (marriage between close kin of the first or second
degree or even in the same family) in Saudi Arabia was around 53 per
cent. Now, that figure has climbed to 67 per cent....
In 2014, the head of the Embryology Unit in Al-Ahsa Maternity and
Children Hospital, Dr. Nihad Al-Kashi, blamed endogamy for up to 70
percent of fetal abnormalities in Saudi Arabia's Al-Ahsa region,
according to an Arab News report.
Dr Al Sulaiman said Saudi population faces genetic diseases no other
country has and has one of the highest genetic disease rates in the
world, estimated at one per 1,000. This compares with one per 4,000 in
the United States and one per 8,000 in Japan.
"This means the ratio of genetic diseases in Saudi Arabia is almost eight times that of Japan,” he told Saudi TV.
Camel love
The deep bond camels share with their owners | GulfNews.com
Winning a camel race may fetch you huge prize money and luxury cars,
“but more than the money, it is the prestige attached to owning the
fastest camels that matters”.
Camels, he said, represent the prestige of a tribe. “We will go to any
extent to retain that honour. We will even die for them. There have been
instances in the past where tribes have fought wars over camels. If
someone from one tribe took away a camel belonging to another, the onus
was on the owner to bring it back, whatever the cost, even if he had to
pay with his life,” Al Ameri said.
Moochers Against Mooching strike again
The IPA gets into mooching again, putting its hand out for money to pay for fellow anti-mooching moocher ("Send me Money - I am defending myself in a defamation case and my fees are extraordinary") Mark Steyn to come out to Australia.
Well, thank God it's not tax deductible this time.
Historical rice
From a review of a new book "Rice - A Global History":
The role of rice in supporting population growth in ancient China is explored in some depth. The arrival of short-growth-season rice varieties into Song Dynasty China, for instance, marked the beginnings of a green revolution. Unfortunately, Marton overlooks the regional complexities of the process — the gradual domestication of perennial wetland grasses in the Yangtze valley, and their subsequent adaptation to temperate China and to drier ecologies in the mountains of Southeast Asia2. The story of the wild rices of India is also passed by. The hybridization of these varieties with Chinese rices, potentially around 4,000 years ago, led to an explosive expansion of agriculture and population growth in India. It was the lowland irrigated forms from India that went on to fuel urban expansion in places like Thailand over the past 2,000 years2. While these stories are missed, other aspects of rice's cross cultural journey are highlighted. Each of these translocations led to new recipes, culinary fusion and diversification, as nicely illustrated by 16 recipes selected from historical cook books the world over. As Marton states “Rice is frequently the white canvas on which culinary cultures are painted.”Rice certainly has played an important role in lots of places, then; more broadly than I had realised.
Marton pays particular attention to the establishment of rice in the Americas, starting in the sixteenth century. Here, traditions of cultivating rice can be traced back to west Africa. Whether initially smuggled by enslaved Africans or intentionally brought over by European settlers, the African rice crop made the tropical lands of the Caribbean and the waterlogged soils of the Lower Mississippi productive enough to support dense populations that then turned their attention to the cultivation of non-subsistence crops like sugar and cotton in less waterlogged soils. The demand for sugar and cotton drove demand for more slaves, and more mouths to feed meant more rice had to be planted. Later, rice became an export commodity in its own right. Marton explains how the growing demand for rice in European urban centres like London in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries came to be met increasingly by American colonies; Africans with inherited cultures of growing rice were in high demand at the time to ensure high profits for their masters. Today, the rice-based dish gumbo, that came out of Louisiana in the eighteenth century, serves as a clear example of the history of rice in the region; the dish takes its name from the linguistic root for the vegetable okra in the African Bantu languages, and is a melting pot of African, French, Spanish and Italian culinary influences.
Around the world on sunlight
Solar plane set for landmark round the world flight
It carries one pilot, and will take 25 days to fly around the world (but landing at several places along the way.)
Going around the world without landing would be more impressive, but I guess 3 weeks of food is quite a lot to carry...
It carries one pilot, and will take 25 days to fly around the world (but landing at several places along the way.)
Going around the world without landing would be more impressive, but I guess 3 weeks of food is quite a lot to carry...
A coupla questions...
Regarding Islamic State, the repulsive movement which seems entirely based on it attracting enough young male psycho/socio-paths from around the world to keep it going:
a. why are the efforts to financially starve this group seemingly taking so long to have any effect? Or does the demand for a $200 million ransom mean that it is starting to have effect?
b. is there a lack of co-operation from certain countries in this approach to the problem? If so, shouldn't we know? What would be the point of the West tip-toeing around that issue?
a. why are the efforts to financially starve this group seemingly taking so long to have any effect? Or does the demand for a $200 million ransom mean that it is starting to have effect?
b. is there a lack of co-operation from certain countries in this approach to the problem? If so, shouldn't we know? What would be the point of the West tip-toeing around that issue?
How "no-go" are "no-go" zones?
The Origins of Fox's Favorite Muslim No-Go-Zone Myth - The Atlantic
Here's a detailed look at the oft repeated claim that Muslims have created "no-go" zones within European cities. It's interesting to see that Daniel Pipes once regretted calling them such, but apparently has recently used the term again. A bit of opportunism there, perhaps?
Slate also weighed in on the matter, with one of its contributors saying she lived in what Fox designated such a zone in 2007, and she found it fine.
It's good to see this being addressed, as I always suspected there was some Pauline Hanson style exaggeration going on.
Here's a detailed look at the oft repeated claim that Muslims have created "no-go" zones within European cities. It's interesting to see that Daniel Pipes once regretted calling them such, but apparently has recently used the term again. A bit of opportunism there, perhaps?
Slate also weighed in on the matter, with one of its contributors saying she lived in what Fox designated such a zone in 2007, and she found it fine.
It's good to see this being addressed, as I always suspected there was some Pauline Hanson style exaggeration going on.
Recent TV viewing
This week's episode of James May's Toy Stories, featuring his effort to make an Action Man doll break the sound barrier, was particularly entertaining. It seems to be up at Dailymotion, and is presumably on the SBS site for viewing too for a couple of weeks yet, too.
David Attenborough's quick run through animal evolution which finished last night on ABC was also good. Many parts of China that he was in looked quite beautiful. Perhaps this was a repeat, but I hadn't seen it before.
David Attenborough's quick run through animal evolution which finished last night on ABC was also good. Many parts of China that he was in looked quite beautiful. Perhaps this was a repeat, but I hadn't seen it before.
American Liar noted
I hadn't paid attention to the Chris Kyle story until the controversy over American Sniper, so I am a little surprised to learn about how he has been shown up as a self aggrandising liar, at least with respect to his exploits in America after returning from Iraq.
I wonder if the exposure of this, shall we say, problematic aspect of his character led Spielberg to drop the project? Or did it only gain ground after he was shot?
Update: from a Slate movie critic reflecting on the movie:
I wonder if the exposure of this, shall we say, problematic aspect of his character led Spielberg to drop the project? Or did it only gain ground after he was shot?
Update: from a Slate movie critic reflecting on the movie:
The falsehoods in American Sniper are dangerous because a lot of audiences leave the theater thinking that Chris Kyle was a role model. I’ve actually gotten emails from military vets who were also troubled by the film. A lot of them are even harsher on Kyle than I’m comfortable being, in part because I’ve never served and in part because I was once attacked by Glenn Beck’s online army after poking holes in Lone Survivor. But American Sniper convinces viewers that Chris Kyle is what heroism looks like: a great guy who shoots a lot of people and doesn’t think twice about it. Watching American Sniper, I kept wondering who Kyle himself had been imitating. Sylvester Stallone? John Wayne? Or the ultimate irony, Clint Eastwood himself as Dirty Harry?
ABC doing pretty well compared to Rupert's baby
Oh, so Rupert's pride and joy, The Australian, is doing its boss's bidding and attacking ABC TV for going from 11% of the national audience to 10.8%. Quelle horreur! I can likely put that down to a few things: too many QI repeats, even for people who don't mind Stephen Fry; many BBC shows being rather dull of late or being sold off to Foxtel already; and Australian comedy and light entertainment production being in a bit of a slump (seems to me to be little in the way of young new talent for years now.)
But how is The OZ doing in popularity, given that about 90% of comments following the ABC story say its because the network is now so Left wing in current affairs?
According to Morgan, across all platforms, from 2013 to 2014 it lost 5.7% of its readership.
Makes the ABC's ratings loss look trivial.*
Being a magnet for one eyed, right wing dummies doesn't seem to pay off, hey Rupe?
* (Although, to be scrupulously fair, 10.8/11 x 100 = 98.18, so the ABC's loss calculated the same was is about 1.8%. Still, only a third of the OZ's loss.)
But how is The OZ doing in popularity, given that about 90% of comments following the ABC story say its because the network is now so Left wing in current affairs?
According to Morgan, across all platforms, from 2013 to 2014 it lost 5.7% of its readership.
Makes the ABC's ratings loss look trivial.*
Being a magnet for one eyed, right wing dummies doesn't seem to pay off, hey Rupe?
* (Although, to be scrupulously fair, 10.8/11 x 100 = 98.18, so the ABC's loss calculated the same was is about 1.8%. Still, only a third of the OZ's loss.)
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
More atonement made easy
I found another brief reference to an atonement method in the book Israelite Religion - this time a Greek ceremony, and with an odd connection with figs.
I have Googled the topic and found a couple of descriptions in books. First, from "Problems with Atonement"
And in another book (The Impact of Yom Kippur on Early Christianity)
I'm not sure if there is any connection with Jesus cursing a fig tree because it wasn't bearing any fruit.
And as to why figs were deemed particularly significant in Greek purification/atonement rituals: this site makes some observations, and uses a lot of big words, but it still seems rather unclear.
Whether it has anything to do with the fact that, if one eats a significant amount of figs at one sitting, one will feel nearly empty of all intestinal impurities within about 24 hours, remains another mystery...
I have Googled the topic and found a couple of descriptions in books. First, from "Problems with Atonement"
And in another book (The Impact of Yom Kippur on Early Christianity)
I'm not sure if there is any connection with Jesus cursing a fig tree because it wasn't bearing any fruit.
And as to why figs were deemed particularly significant in Greek purification/atonement rituals: this site makes some observations, and uses a lot of big words, but it still seems rather unclear.
Whether it has anything to do with the fact that, if one eats a significant amount of figs at one sitting, one will feel nearly empty of all intestinal impurities within about 24 hours, remains another mystery...
Some seriously deranged thinking going on here...
Man who suffered failed penis enlargement operation 'murdered prostitute' | Daily Mail Online
[I did recently post about penile enlargement operations, and - separately - about a famous author's chronic habit of blaming women for his strong sex drive which seemingly disgusted him. The moral of this news story may therefore be that it's lucky that Tolstoy didn't have modern cosmetic surgery available to him.]
PS: I think I deserve some sort of recognition for - I suspect - creating the first piece of writing in the history of the universe to link Tolstoy with penile enlargement surgery.
[I did recently post about penile enlargement operations, and - separately - about a famous author's chronic habit of blaming women for his strong sex drive which seemingly disgusted him. The moral of this news story may therefore be that it's lucky that Tolstoy didn't have modern cosmetic surgery available to him.]
PS: I think I deserve some sort of recognition for - I suspect - creating the first piece of writing in the history of the universe to link Tolstoy with penile enlargement surgery.
When Harry reviewed Richard
I see that last week, Harry Clarke (at his temporary blog) posted a review of a book by Richard Tol.
Given that Harry only recently pointed out at his old blog where his temporary blog was located, I was surprised to find that Tol himself had already appeared in comments complaining about Harry's rather mildly worded review.
This suggests Tol likely spends a fair amount of time Googling up his own name for references to him, no matter where they appear.
It also appears that Harry does not know of Tol's reputation for attacking people he disagrees with. Harry should do some searches for references to him at Rabbett Run, and And Then There's Physics, and elsewhere.
And elsewhere, I see Tol weighing in on a ATTP post about Matt Ridley's complaining column in The Times that he's unfairly attacked for being a "lukewarmer".
I think Richard has too much time on his hands
Given that Harry only recently pointed out at his old blog where his temporary blog was located, I was surprised to find that Tol himself had already appeared in comments complaining about Harry's rather mildly worded review.
This suggests Tol likely spends a fair amount of time Googling up his own name for references to him, no matter where they appear.
It also appears that Harry does not know of Tol's reputation for attacking people he disagrees with. Harry should do some searches for references to him at Rabbett Run, and And Then There's Physics, and elsewhere.
And elsewhere, I see Tol weighing in on a ATTP post about Matt Ridley's complaining column in The Times that he's unfairly attacked for being a "lukewarmer".
I think Richard has too much time on his hands
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)