David Roberts at Vox has a good article up explaining the doubts about how valid any of the long term economic modelling of climate change can really be.
Given that I had noticed those doubts being expressed in some of the quieter corners of the 'net for a year or two now, it's good to see this is finally getting some broader attention.
I did raise this issue in a thread at John Quiggin's blog recently too, noting Pindyck's criticism of the whole IAM exercise, but he didn't comment on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment