Haneef caught in Groundhog Day, says lawyer | The Courier-Mail
Yesterday, the Courier Mail reported on what may have been in the undisclosed evidence that Minister Andrews has referred to in his Dr Haneef visa revocation decision.
It's pretty major stuff: that Haneef had come to the attention of MI5 because he was in contact with radicals they were monitoring. The Courier Mail repeats it briefly today (see link above).
I heard this mentioned on Radio National Breakfast yesterday, not in the "news" but in the "what's in the papers today" section.
Yet, that is absolutely the only reference to the story I have heard anywhere else. Instead, the dodgy , just created Indian "dossier" got all the attention, and even Keelty seems to dismiss that as not very important.
Why would this story be being ignored? Does no other journalist in Australia trust the Courier Mail? Why has no one mentioned it to Keelty?
I find this very puzzling....
UPDATE: a Google news search confirms that this story is getting virtually zero attention. It seems to me that there has to be a reason for this.
No comments:
Post a Comment