An account of how Frances Abbott came to be a student at Whitehouse, provided to New Matilda by a staff member, casts further doubt on the claims by the Prime Minister that her appointment was based entirely on merit.The ambiguity in that last sentence could do with some clarifying. If it means "this College stands to benefit heaps if Tony Abbott wins by virtue of changes to government policy" it is much more important than "this College will have a higher profile if Tony Abbott gets in and her daughter as a graduate."
The source told New Matilda that Frances Abbott was approached by Whitehouse Chairman of the Board - and friend of the Abbott family - Les Taylor, after Taylor became aware that Frances was looking to complete a degree with a competing design school.
“Les Taylor knew the Abbott family. [Frances] wanted to do something related to creativity and styling. She was going to go to one of our competitors. I think it was Billy Blue [a design school in North Sydney],” the source told NM.
“Leanne got the Chairman of the Board [Taylor] to tell [Frances] she had the offer of a scholarship.”
A few years later, in the run-up to the 2013 federal election, Ms Whitehouse became increasingly excited at the prospect of a Liberal win, the staffer said.
“She said to me something like, ‘Do you know what this could mean to Whitehouse if [Abbott] gets in?’
In any event, if, as looks increasingly likely, this indeed was a special, one off invitation to come to the College for (virtually) free, of course it should have sent off Abbott's political antenna that it would look like a College seeking out political favours. But it is hard to know how smart Abbott truly is. Not very, has long been my judgement.
Yoo - hoo, Andrew Bolt, won't you do a post on this?
Update: the story continues to develop:
Classmates express fury over Tony Abbott’s daughter Frances being awarded $60,000 scholarship to Whitehouse Institute of Design
Interestingly, it now sounds like Leanne Whitehouse personally funds and selects:
“The scholarship that Frances received was a direct scholarship from the founder and owner Leanne Whitehouse. As a private company, Leanne has from time to time awarded it,” Mr Tudor said.The optics of this is so bad. The "best" that Abbott can hope from this is (assuming that Frances was competing with no one to get her scholarship) is if he can claim that he didn't know she was getting such favoured treatment. Because if he did - it is obvious that it would look like political favour being sought, and he should have declared it.
“Originally it was called the MD’s scholarship and subsequently the chairs scholarship. It is a discretionary award made and funded by Leanne Whitehouse.”
And remember - unlike poor old O'Farell - Abbott's government actually did change policy in a way which helped this College (and others.)
UPDATE: As Junkee says, this shouldn't be about the results Frances got as a student. (And, I would add, her current employment with Whitehouse.) It is, however, all about Tony Abbott and the reasons he has not disclosed it (assuming it is the situation that the reporting is indicating - a specific invitation to Frances to apply for a scholarship that she got with no competition from anyone else). The final paragraphs about his appalling hypocrisy (I hated the way he was always parading with his daughters during election campaign) are spot on:
Tone’s hypocrisy and cynical opportunism does, however, explain the particularly virulent strain of schadenfreude at play. Only this morning, Tone told Karl Stefanovic that “families should be kept out of the front line. That’s the way I’ve always tried to run my political operation – that we play hard but fair. Families should be [left] out of it.”
Given this principled stance, it’s weird how Abbott’s ‘not bad-looking daughters’ keep bobbing at politically expedient moments and for photo-ops. It seems inevitable that this habit would bite him on the arse at some point, and it looks like that point has arrived.
UPDATE 2: I'm rather intrigued by the media outlets that are (and aren't) running with the story. It's been the top one on The Guardian's website all day, but Fairfax seemed to quickly let it drop away in prominence. And then News.com.au, from an article on The Courier Mail website, has been featuring it top of the page since (I think) around lunch time. The Daily Mail on line is running with it too, but is giving more prominence to the stupid "wink" story.
The ABC is not running it at all, but is still talking about winkgate.
One might wonder whether the ABC is feeling a bit worried about further government attack if it is being seen to "go after" a politicians daughter - but surely this is a very newsworthy story about the PM, and can be run without pillorying the daughter.
UPDATE 3: Ha! Karl Stefanovic smooches up to Tony Abbott when he asks him how Frances Abbott is coping with all the questions being asked about the "scholarship she deserved". (He repeats that line twice, in fact.) Abbott confirms she won it on her "academic potential".
Tony, the question is more about whether anyone else got a chance to put their "academic potential" to the College. And stop crapping on about how you "leave your family out of it". Frances couldn't be pried off your side during the last election campaign, you user.
2 comments:
Has the government take you off disability yet?
I assume Catallaxians have stopped talking about it because they can see that Abbott's failure to disclose a major benefit to a close family member is indefensible.
Post a Comment