Somewhat interesting article about whether
humans are better off with "bi-phasic" sleep:
Anthropologists have found evidence that during preindustrial Europe,
bi-modal sleeping was considered the norm. Sleep onset was determined
not by a set bedtime, but by whether there were things to do. Historian
A. Roger Ekirch’s book At day’s close: night in times past
describes how households at this time retired a couple of hours after
dusk, woke a few hours later for one to two hours, and then had a second
sleep until dawn.
During this waking period, people would relax, ponder their dreams or
have sex. Some would engage in activities like sewing, chopping wood or
reading, relying on the light of the moon or oil lamps.
Ekirch found references to the first and second sleep started to
disappear during the late 17th century. This is thought to have started
in the upper classes in Northern Europe and filtered down to the rest of
Western society over the next 200 years.
Interestingly, the appearance of sleep maintenance insomnia in the literature
in the late 19th century coincides with the period where accounts of
split sleep start to disappear. Thus, modern society may place
unnecessary pressure on individuals that they must obtain a night of
continuous consolidated sleep every night, adding to the anxiety about
sleep and perpetuating the problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment