So, some dude from the University of Waterloo (where? Ontario I see) has
an article on The Conversation seemingly advocating that the next year is a good time for the US to carry out a "surgical" nuclear strike on North Korea:
Properly used, nuclear munitions can result in a minimum of radioactive
or long-term contamination, or mass destruction —far lesser
consequences than if North Korea actually detonated one of their crude
nuclear weapons.
Do us a favour, Rupert, and don't get him on Fox News morning show and have Steve Doocebag nod approvingly.
1 comment:
he needs a korea change?
Post a Comment