Graham Readfearn does a rather excellent job at detailing how Andrew Bolt's editorial piece on Peter Ridd (which was likely only viewed by his small echo chamber of viewers anyway) was wrong in all key aspects.
(Incidentally, haven't had the chance to use the verb "to Fisk" for a long time. Whatever happened to Fisk anyway. I see he still does some reporting, but he is much more ignored than he ever used to be...)
1 comment:
great minds.
I wrote about this as well.
Post a Comment