I never got around to seeing Scarface until this weekend just gone.
Given that I only saw The Godfather in 2016, and found it lacking, there just might be a bit of a "it's not you, it's me" going on with my reaction to well received mafia/gangster movies. Because, yeah, I was underwhelmed with this movie too, despite my fondness for a lot of the work of Brian de Palma.
I just thought the story didn't have much dramatic drive. It was too simple, really, and as such, perhaps I can blame Oliver Stone's script. But even the direction was uneven - sometimes some swooping crane shots, sometimes some heavy handed zooms into eyes or faces - signs of de Palma thinking about what to do. But often on the important sequences, it seemed the direction went suddenly static and mundane. I love the entire shoot out at the train station sequence in The Untouchables - there was nothing thrilling like that in this one. The one big public shoot out was nothing special, directorially.
As with The Godfather, I didn't hate it: just didn't really understand why a lot of reviewers thought it was great. But it's true - I rarely think much of any film that dwells on the lives of gangsters. For example, I've seen Goodfellas once (at the cinema, I think) and also found it OK, but nothing to get excited about, and I am disinclined to watch it again. And yet I am enjoying the second season of Fargo. And I love The Untouchables. I think I see the pattern here - I can only really like movies featuring criminal families and gangsters if the Good Guys also have a prominent role in the story. Simplifies my viewing choices, that does...
No comments:
Post a Comment