Wednesday, July 03, 2019

A typical pattern

I have been pretty busy today, so not much time to get to deleting Bird poop currently afflicting my comments.

Those familiar with Graeme Bird's history as a serial pest in the Australian blogosphere have had a few days' reminder of what he was like, and why he ends up getting banned sooner or later.

[In fact, sorry to tell you Bird, but your ideas seem pretty much stuck where they were a decade ago.  Your primarily anti-Semitic conspiracies, cosmology and "reverse engineered" physics is very stale.]

As I mentioned before, he's been going through old posts of mine and making comments which I notice because copies are automatically emailed to me.  Hence, I found this at the end of one of his comments last night, to one of my posts about Helen Dale, which is typical of the Bird of old - eventually getting angry or weird enough to throw in a line that sounds like it's from a dangerous psychopath:
In my view the problem was with Australia and not with Helen. She can reinvent her own act every second year, set up any number of protective barriers, to protect the girl and the artist, as much as she wants ...... and its really no-one elses business but her own.

Last time I met her, and last time I talked to her, was before I turned anti-Judaic. Jason can verify this, so don't try and condemn her by association, or I'll come around and slit your puppies throat.
(I presume he has noticed the occasional pic of my pup which gets posted here.)

I think that makes it worthwhile just deleting all future comments from you, Bird:  you're very strange, and  the amusement of interacting with you always wears off fast.

UPDATE:   in response to comments -

*  how have you all missed my dog's photos, such as this one from only a month ago?  (She has appeared a few times before, too.)  Zero marks for observation, everyone. 

*  no, I don't worry that Bird really is a psychopathic wannabe killer - you will note I actually responded to him in comments here in mocking tone, which I would not do if I feared he was actually was a danger to me (or my dog).   But it's still off putting to be dealing with anyone who references, just about daily, an imagined violent fate for his imagined enemies.   I think Jason only found a reference to killing a dog funny because he knows Bird's over the top rhetorical history - but no one near normal makes jokes like that, and he shouldn't be rewarded by normalisation via his repetition of conspiracy think that is ridiculously targeted against Jews, and the violent imagery he often spouts along with it.

*  he has "retracted" the comment, which is nice - but he'll lose his temper again soon enough, or make some bad taste or offensive comment of some kind.  

Hence, I'm just deleting him from now on, but if I am busy - like today - they may linger for a while before they go.





12 comments:

GMB said...

No I didn't see any puppy photos. Its just a figure of speech. People are always looking for reasons to damage Helen, even when she's in another country.

GMB said...

"In fact, sorry to tell you Bird, but your ideas seem pretty much stuck where they were a decade ago. Your primarily anti-Semitic conspiracies, cosmology and "reverse engineered" physics is very stale."

Real science is never stale. Its always exciting. Oligarchically mandated physics is boring. They make it a little bit exciting for small children. You know worm holes, black holes, space bending, shortening of mass in the direction of fast motion, time stretching, all manner of Jew voodoo. All manner of dictatorial lies. But anyone over about 12 gets bored to tears with these shams.

So we get a lot of people dropping out of science and going in for business degrees and things. Which is a real shame. Plus they are actively destroying all our chances with alternative energy. The oligarchy got rid of the street cars. They got rid of the trompes and pulled the library books to do with trompes out of the library never to be returned. They destroyed the dirigibles industry with terrorist attack on the Hindenburg. The fellow who organised the terrorist attack was a professional baseball catcher. A Jew. No doubt the oligarchy is behind the failure to put canals everywhere and the long-run diminishment of rail. But thats harder to track.

Overunity devices are actually quite prosaic. They aren't pristine energy production like in the suns corona or in the orbits of major bodies. This isn't new energy production. But it does take advantage of the earths electrical field in order to produce more output than input. They are quite easy to make but they require precision engineering, the creation of vacuums, exquisite timing and so forth. So a fellow might spend 5 years putting together a prototype and then the men in black will show up and threaten his family, destroy his work and that sort of thing. So the oligarchy makes sure the premium price stays on the hydrocarbons.

Steve said...

A figure of speech! Would love to hear your explanations to the Magistrate if you've ever been forced into a court appearance over some foolish thing you've said to someone.

And speaking of pups, it's like something went wrong with your socialisation with humans.

As I said, your shtick is pretty stale now anyway, including the old weird turns into violent imagery (people deserving to be hung etc).

It's easier just to delete you always.

GMB said...

I retract the statement. I was only joking. But you should apologise for your veiled threat vis a vis Mossad. One of the most heartless organisations the world has yet seen.

Jason Soon said...

Steve
I actually believe Bird in this instance. I've been following your blog forever and I didn't realise you had a puppy (perhaps being more of a cat person myself). I doubt he did either. I read that line and laughed at it as an obvious case of hyperbole

And Bird, steve is a mild mannered Catholic family man, not a Mossad agent. He used to vote for John Howard then he got freaked out by all the climate change stuff and has since done a total U turn because of that. that's where a lot of his stupid views come from

GMB said...

You must admit that Steve comes across pretty sinister though. Coming down on an athlete like that being persecuted by corporate bullies. Disrespecting a Vietnamese journalist whose doing socially responsible work. Its pretty anti-Australian and upsetting stuff. Plus he started insulting me from the getgo. I don't know Jason. How well do you really know this fellow? Netanyahu's international internet policy is very clear. He's got roomfulls of guys targeting us. I suppose I will believe you if you think you know this stuff. But he ought not be so disrespectful of Vietnamese, White Guys, Islanders and then turn around and toady to one group only. Thats not exactly even-handed.

Sinclair Davidson said...

I had forgotten you had a puppy - so I'm inclined to go with Jason here.

But banning Bird is the only thing that can be done. He cannot be reasoned with, he cannot be shamed, he cannot be distracted. I don't think for one moment that he is physically dangerous. He is just off his rocker. This is sad - there was a time when he could be very funny and very insightful.

You need to keep deleting his comments and identifying them as spam. At some point, in theory (ha!), blogger will begin to automatically block him.

Anonymous said...

Stepford

I always took you for cat lady. Stop being a whimp. Bird is not going to murder your dog.

He’s done worse to me. Out of the blue, Bird once called my wife on the landline to complain about me being abusive to him. My wife actually took his side because she argued that I really must have done wrong by him if he was motivated enough to call and complain about me. I let it go because there’s no way of explaining Bird to someone who doesn’t know about him or read his comments.

John said...

Real science is never stale. Its always exciting

Then try reading some Graeme because not all physicists believe in space being bent by gravity or the conservation laws being absolute. There is a lot of debate in the physics community but you seem to think it is this one huge monolithic all controlling oligarchy. It certainly can come across like that but if you dig deeper it is not uncommon to find many dissenting opinions. So sometimes I think you're attacking straw men because more often than not you are criticizing the popular presentation of science rather than the activity of science.

Steve said...

Jason: you're account of the evolution of my political views misses much nuance and detail, such as -

* my dislike and disdain for Kevin Rudd from the start

* the way the American Right has clearly turned into a self-gaslighting, evidence free party on economics as well as climate change (the Laffer revival, for example, despite the clear examples of it failing completely in Kansas and other States)

* the transfer of stupidity from the Republicans to some of the Coalition in Australia

* the sheer, shallow opportunism of Tony Abbott on climate change, showing that the man had no principles and is as politically shallow as they come

* the embarrassing job he made of being PM

* the barely hidden racism behind much of the wingnut Right's reaction to anything Obama did (and recalling that I was initially sceptical that he was a man of any substance before he was first elected)

* the acquiescence of Republicans to the appallingly wannabe authoritarian behaviour of Trump - and the normalisation via repetition of his childish, name calling and ugly rallies

* the Murdoch cynical establishment of the pure propaganda media outfit to support Republicans that is Fox News, and the disinformation it spreads to poison moderate political discourse.


In short, there is every reason in the world (even apart from climate change) why a person who thought John Howard did a reasonable job as PM should now find the American Right utterly awful and dangerous, and consider the Coalition here also tainted by current Right wing ideas and undeserving of government.

GMB said...

“Then try reading some Graeme because not all physicists believe in space being bent by gravity or the conservation laws being absolute. There is a lot of debate in the physics community but you seem to think it is this one huge monolithic all controlling oligarchy.”

Its all in the context of dictatorial science fraud though. They haven’t embraced the aether or thrown Einstein out on his tawdry butt. What they did is find a cripple and then put words in his mouth. When he died they just wheeled him out and wheeled in another cripple. Crippled oracles, wormholes, dark matter, dark energy, hologram universe and string theory. Just all a lot of idiocy.

They had to concede that energy isn’t necessarily stable because of their dark energy nonsense, in the context of an expanding universe. So if you have told two lies sometimes you have to choose.

GMB said...

Either this Jew starts getting interested in real science or his rabbit "gets it."