Recent research suggests ocean heat has risen dramatically over the past decade, leading to the potential for warming water in the Indian Ocean to affect the Indian monsoon, one of the most important climate patterns in the world.The article goes onto note that the dipole has been causing flood problems in East Africa - something getting scant attention in the rest of the world, it seems:
“There has been research suggesting that Indian Ocean dipole events have become more common with the warming in the last 50 years, with climate models suggesting a tendency for such events to become more frequent and becoming stronger,” Ummenhofer said.
She said warming appeared to be “supercharging” mechanisms already existing in the background. “The Indian Ocean is particularly sensitive to a warming world. It is the canary in the coalmine seeing big changes before others come to other tropical ocean areas.”
Australian climatologists have pointed to this year’s dipole as at least one of the contributing factors in the bushfires. Jonathan Pollock, of Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology, said this dipole was “up there as one of the strongest” on record.
Gemma Connell, of the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, raised concern over the impact of stronger and more regular Indian Ocean dipole events on Africa.What's that? Increased global warming leading to both big droughts and big floods? Stoopid people like Andrew Bolt have not been able to get their tribal brains around that prediction for decades.
“What we are seeing from the current record events is large-scale flooding across the region. Entire swathes are under water, affecting 2.5 million people,” she said.
“And putting it in the broader picture of the climate crisis, this flooding is coming on the back of two droughts. What we are seeing, and what we are going to see more of, is more frequent climatic shocks coming. And all that is on top of the violence and conflict that has already displaced many of the people involved.
Mind you, as always, prediction of the exact effects on average local rainfall under climate change is much harder than predicting average global temperature rises:
Another concern for Connell and other humanitarian officials is that although climate scientists are racing to try to develop predictive modelling, there is disagreement over whether stronger Indian Ocean dipole events will lead to a wetter climate for Africa or a drier one.And if some reader comes here and says "so that means anything will "confirm" global warming?" - don't be an idiot: global warming/climate change is settled science on one level, but they've always been open that changes to rainfall patterns on a regional level are hard to predict.
4 comments:
You expect deniers to read about the subject and then comprehend it??
Interesting that bolt's brother has NEVER co,e out in support of his assertions. He does know about global warming
Well of course the climate is changing. Its just not changing on the basis of CO2. Weather is mostly all about electrical effects. The sun hasn't been behaving in typical fashion. So whats the problem here?
"Recent research suggests ocean heat has risen dramatically over the past decade, leading to the potential for warming water in the Indian Ocean to affect the Indian monsoon, one of the most important climate patterns in the world."
No thats just all lies. Would be good if it were true, then we'd have more rain.
Soil loss due to monocultural crop-growing leads to more floods and droughts. Caroline seems to be an okay young scientist so far. But Graham Readfern is a bullshitartist from way back, and the Guardian is just a propaganda rag for the oligarchy. So these lies could have come in at any part of the process. Its not like I've been watching measurements in the Indian Ocean these last ten years. But I don't think you are going to find any serious measurements to the effect Readfern is claiming. When you get a liar like this fellow its best not to bring the young scientist into it.
Post a Comment