I'm being a bit mean - there's not much doubt that Bill Gates is one of the better billionaires in terms of charity work; but I didn't like his hedging on Warren vs Trump last week.
Some people think he was talking in code: that of course "the most professional" candidate would not be Trump. And it's true, he may have concerns about the vindictive vanity of Trump would mean a complete freeze out from Federal government co-operation with Gate's plans. (It has already stopped work on experimental nuclear in China.)
But really - if a basically decent billionaire can't say something like "if it was a choice between Trump and some weirdo genocide supporting communist Pol Pot, sure I would vote Trump. Otherwise, as if I would vote for that idiot", then what's the point of being a billionaire?
Gates probably does suffer from over-confidence in his own judgement (I guess it comes with the billionaire territory), and I'm not sure that he has got that many runs on the board for innovation in areas that now interest him. The research into better condoms, for example - where has that gone? I'm not sure that his nuclear dreams are all that well founded, either.
And I'll end by noting this Onion article, which amused me:
No comments:
Post a Comment